Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

Is GeForce GT 755M really better than GT 750M? Plzz help

Tags:
  • Lenovo
  • Graphics Cards
  • Graphics
Last response: in Graphics & Displays
Share
April 13, 2014 1:55:22 AM

I am thinking of buying lenovo Y510. In the international variants it supports GT 755M whereas in my country lenovo is only providing with GT 750M. Is there a great difference in matters of gaming and performance? I searched on net and it says 6.6 rating for 750M and 6.9 for 755M. Does it make alot of difference while playing games like Call of duty, Battlefield, Fifa14, PES, Assasins Creed, Bioshock, Crisis etc. I mainly play football and war stimulated shooting games. So will it make a great difference for me?
One more query the lenovoY510 comes with an ultrabay for additional GPU. So if I buy seperately another GT 750M to what extent will the performance be enhanced? Do I need to buy 1 more 750M (Dual GT 750M) or it will suffice with only the inbuilt 2gb GT 750M?

More about : geforce 755m 750m plzz

a c 248 U Graphics card
April 13, 2014 2:15:02 AM

They are GT's as opposed to GTX GPUs. They have slower memory than GTX's. GT's are very limited in what they can do as compared to a GTX. The best laptop GPU (GTX 880M) is half the power of a desktop GPU (Titan Black).

A GT 750m is benchmarked at 1500 and a GT 755m at 1600 on http://www.videocardbenchmark.net/high_end_gpus.html. So there is roughly 10% between them. 2 x 750m would yield a relative benchmark of about 2500. This is about the same as a GT645 - one of the lowest powered current desktop GPU's. If you look at http://www.futuremark.com/hardware/gpu/NVIDIA+GeForce+G... you get an idea where a GT645 would rank amongst the gamut of desktop GPU's.
You can see on Tom's what a GT 645 can do - http://www.tomshardware.com/answers/id-1828346/nvidia-g...
So don't expect much.

Me - I wouldn't spend my money on that laptop for gaming. Proper gaming laptops are expensive - MSI G series, Asus 750 series. For $2000 you can get a pretty good laptop. For $2000 you can get a cracker of a gaming desktop PC. And the trouble is her at Tom's you're probably speaking to a biased audience.
m
0
l
Related resources
a c 248 U Graphics card
April 13, 2014 2:19:41 AM

I think that's where he got his 6.6 and 6.9
m
0
l
April 13, 2014 11:36:47 AM

i7Baby said:
They are GT's as opposed to GTX GPUs. They have slower memory than GTX's. GT's are very limited in what they can do as compared to a GTX. The best laptop GPU (GTX 880M) is half the power of a desktop GPU (Titan Black).

A GT 750m is benchmarked at 1500 and a GT 755m at 1600 on http://www.videocardbenchmark.net/high_end_gpus.html. So there is roughly 10% between them. 2 x 750m would yield a relative benchmark of about 2500. This is about the same as a GT645 - one of the lowest powered current desktop GPU's. If you look at http://www.futuremark.com/hardware/gpu/NVIDIA+GeForce+G... you get an idea where a GT645 would rank amongst the gamut of desktop GPU's.
You can see on Tom's what a GT 645 can do - http://www.tomshardware.com/answers/id-1828346/nvidia-g...
So don't expect much.

Me - I wouldn't spend my money on that laptop for gaming. Proper gaming laptops are expensive - MSI G series, Asus 750 series. For $2000 you can get a pretty good laptop. For $2000 you can get a cracker of a gaming desktop PC. And the trouble is her at Tom's you're probably speaking to a biased audience.


I know PCs have got higher graphics when compared to laptops. But I am looking for more of a laptop which I can use both for gaming as well as work. And I guess with GT 750M or 755M I could possibly play most of the high end games. Right? Then it's not worth spending $2000 - $2500 on an Alienware or MSI or Razer Blade laptops.
m
0
l
a c 248 U Graphics card
April 13, 2014 2:30:17 PM

My guess is that you could play the games but not at high detail. I'd never recommend an Alienware laptop anyway - they're way overpriced. But Asus G750's and MSI G (gaming) laptops seem to have good specs.
m
1
l
!