Sam Jackson :
Egitel :
Honestly it's up to you. A lot of gamers wouldn't go for anything more than 2ms, but to each his own. If you like the monitors otherwise, than go with what you like.
why don't most gamers like to go over 2ms? Does it take away the viewing experience or does ghosting happen or something?
There's a rumor it does, though I suspect it's a myth.
The human eye in military tests can detect at most 600 fps (or so I hear), but most people stop seeing a difference at 60-90 fps. Some unlucky souls see a difference up to 120 fps. I don't envy them; think of how much more they have to spend on video cards. XD
You couldn't see a difference from 2ms to 6ms, as it'd be physically impossible to see a difference at 144 fps, which is the max any current monitors can display. The framerate would need to be at least 167 fps before 6ms became lower than the framerate.
If people claim to see a difference, it's either a placebo effect, or the company that made the monitor lied and manipulated the response time when it was really 16ms or something. (which is very common among low quality TVs and monitors)