Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

i5 4670k vs FX-8350/8320 video

Tags:
  • Graphics Cards
  • CPUs
Last response: in CPUs
Share
a b à CPUs
April 15, 2014 11:17:55 AM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=26UKz42uQ1Y

Trying to generate some discussion with this review. A lot of people that recommend the FX-8xxx series reference the review done by Tek Syndicate and posted on Youtube around a year ago. So here's one that results in a strong recommendation for the 4670k.

To summarize his tests/conclusion, the quad core Intel solution wins in every single test he runs. Singleplayer games, multiplayer games, rendering, streaming, general usage, etc...The Intel beats the AMD by a mile in some, and by a little in others. But it straight out wins every time.

I found it particularly interesting that the reviewer concludes that the 4670k, which has only 4 cores as we know, beats the 8-core FX-8350 in streaming. Streaming and rendering are very often reasons stated by people recommending AMD FX CPU's, because of the higher physical core count. Apparently that's not the case.

Now of course, everyone has to decide what is right for their budget, and the AMD solution is probably going to be a decent amount less expensive. That argument has never been lost on me. This is specifically about what is better though. Even in applications that are heavily multi-threaded the quad core Intel is, according to his tests, better.

More about : 4670k 8350 8320 video

a b U Graphics card
a b à CPUs
April 15, 2014 11:46:12 AM

this guy is a total r*****d and from my experience i would never trust anything this guy says...he bought the FX box on ebay and plugged in the numbers he wanted you to see..he is the worst intel fanboy ever...see how he dosnt even show the rig used for testing or anything? he is surrounded by boxes of stuff, that's it...you can see that i posted videos of my own rig running battlefield 4 on his channel to confront him just look at BF4 multiplayer he says the AMD rig gave him 39fps as a minimum while my exact same rig with FX-8320 and GTX 780oc never gets anything bellow 60fps at 1080p ultra preset...and of course for streaming and stuff the FX 8 core is vastly superior...also just look at the UNIGINE VALLEY results, this is a GPU only test it uses like 10 ro 15 % maximum in ressources from your cpu and shif all the load on the GPU this is why its a GPU benchmark but even then he post much better results from his intel rig...then again i posted my valley benchmarks results and he said they where false...this guy can't deal with the fact that AMD cpu's can perform just as well as intel's cpu in many situation..
m
0
l
a b U Graphics card
a c 473 à CPUs
April 15, 2014 12:36:39 PM

paitjsu sadff said:
this guy is a total retard and from my experience i would never trust anything this guy says...he bought the FX box on ebay and plugged in the numbers he wanted you to see..he is the worst intel fanboy ever...see how he dosnt even show the rig used for testing or anything? he is surrounded by boxes of stuff, that's it...you can see that i posted videos of my own rig running battlefield 4 on his channel to confront him just look at BF4 multiplayer he says the AMD rig gave him 39fps as a minimum while my exact same rig with FX-8320 and GTX 780oc never gets anything bellow 60fps at 1080p ultra preset...and of course for streaming and stuff the FX 8 core is vastly superior...also just look at the UNIGINE VALLEY results, this is a GPU only test it uses like 10 ro 15 % maximum in ressources from your cpu and shif all the load on the GPU this is why its a GPU benchmark but even then he post much better results from his intel rig...then again i posted my valley benchmarks results and he said they where false...this guy can't deal with the fact that AMD cpu's can perform just as well as intel's cpu in many situation..


Funny that. Logan from Tek Syndicate was the only one to get his results, different from everything else on the web. But he's not a r****d (I don't care for that word)? As soon as he's supporting FX, what you own, he's suddenly correct. It's odd how consumer biases affect viewpoints.

Can you show me where he said your results were false?
m
0
l
a b U Graphics card
a b à CPUs
April 15, 2014 12:45:56 PM

JOOK-D said:


Funny that. Logan from Tek Syndicate was the only one to get his results, different from everything else on the web. But he's not a r****d (I don't care for that word)? As soon as he's supporting FX, what you own, he's suddenly correct. It's odd how consumer biases affect viewpoints.

Can you show me where he said your results were false?


Yes just check in the comments i posted a lot in this very video i posted videos wich he said was done wrong i did 4 different videos doing exactly what he told me to do and it still was not good enough for him to run more tests he refused to admit that maybe something was wrong with his test bench and then i posted my unigine valley results wich he said was photoshoped.

i've seen some good reviews on the internet, and in those reviews the intel i5 was winning in anything that used 4 cores or less, it was also consumming less power..there are facts that can't be denied the intel i5 is an amazing CPU...but test showing the FX 8 core performing worst then the intel i5 in gaming while streaming scenario or in GPU benchmarks discredite this guy totaly and i'm sure you agree with me on that.

m
0
l
a b U Graphics card
a c 473 à CPUs
April 15, 2014 12:49:28 PM

paitjsu sadff said:
JOOK-D said:


Funny that. Logan from Tek Syndicate was the only one to get his results, different from everything else on the web. But he's not a r****d (I don't care for that word)? As soon as he's supporting FX, what you own, he's suddenly correct. It's odd how consumer biases affect viewpoints.

Can you show me where he said your results were false?


Yes just check in the comments i posted a lot in this very video i posted videos wich he said was done wrong i did 4 different videos doing exactly what he told me to do and it still was not good enough for him to run more tests he refused to admit that maybe something was wrong with his test bench and then i posted my unigine valley results wich he said was photoshoped.

i've seen some good reviews on the internet, and in those reviews the intel i5 was winning in anything that used 4 cores or less, it was also consumming less power..there are facts that can't be denied the intel i5 is an amazing CPU...but test showing the FX 8 core performing worst then the intel i5 in gaming while streaming scenario or in GPU benchmarks discredite this guy totaly and i'm sure you agree with me on that.



Is your account Tech Wiz Master?
m
0
l
a b U Graphics card
a b à CPUs
April 15, 2014 12:51:08 PM

JOOK-D said:



Is your account Tech Wiz Master?[/quotemsg]

yes it is, i'm sorry

m
0
l
a b U Graphics card
a c 473 à CPUs
April 15, 2014 12:55:24 PM

Well I think I just found out what you're like. You didn't really represent yourself very well here...

[Foul language. Removed.]

Or here:

[More of the same. Removed.]

You claim that the percentage figure is the Fan Speed. Show one with GPU utilisation.
m
0
l
a b U Graphics card
a b à CPUs
April 15, 2014 12:57:55 PM

JOOK-D said:


You claim that the percentage figure is the Fan Speed. Show one with GPU utilisation.

i will gladly do that for you and post it tonight i'm working ATM, i'm sry but everything pushed me out of my sox and i went overboard on the comments at some point in this thread but this guy was really pushing me...this was after i made 3 different videos for him and one was very conclusive but he kept arguing and wanted more videos wich i produced it took me over 3 hours to put all that togheter...

BTW i think you should not post that in here, youtube tolerate heavy language but toms is different it's a family oriented area..

m
0
l
a b U Graphics card
a c 473 à CPUs
April 15, 2014 1:03:53 PM

paitjsu sadff said:
JOOK-D said:


You claim that the percentage figure is the Fan Speed. Show one with GPU utilisation.

i will gladly do that for you and post it tonight i'm working ATM, i'm sry but everything pushed me out of my sox and i went overboard on the comments at some point in this thread but this guy was really pushing me...this was after i made 3 different videos for him and one was very conclusive but he kept arguing and wanted more videos wich i produced it took me over 3 hours to put all that togheter...

BTW i think you should not post that in here, youtube tolerate heavy language but toms is different it's a family oriented area..



Well you've already used one of those words earlier in this very thread. I'll censor it though.
m
0
l
a b U Graphics card
a b à CPUs
April 15, 2014 1:13:41 PM

JOOK-D said:


Well you've already used one of those words earlier in this very thread. I'll censor it though.


I'm sorry english is not my first language and i wasn't aware that this word that starts with an ''R'' and end up with a ''d'' while being impolite was not okay to say in here, i corrected myself and i'm sorry for it.
m
0
l
!