Hi Tom's People,
Here is the filter of drives I've narrowed my choices down to (click for link to PC Part Picker list).
I have a build almost where I want it, and now I am wrapping up some details to get my storage solution where it should be. My primary use is photography, but I definitely enjoy games. That's not relevant here, though. Losing my photo library would completely suck, and I want to setup a RAID1 to give good fault tolerance. I also back up off site, but I don't want to completely rely on that either, hence the RAID1.
Currently, I use a 2TB Barracuda for media storage. It's been great, but it's not RAID1. If you could please help me decide between which pair of 4TB drives to get, I would appreciate it. Refer to the link above for the drives.
Keep in mind that I've looked through the specs on each of the drives, so what will really help is highlighting why certain specs are more well suited for my particular use, rather than just saying that drive A has feature x whereas drive B has feature y.
I'm not brand loyal when it comes to HDD, but I've also had every WD drive I've ever owned fail on me in a relatively short time. I've also never had a Segate drive fail on me, and I have owned a lot of drives. As for Hitachi and Toshiba, I've never owned either.
Some questions I have are whether getting a non-desktop drive is worth is (e.g. NAS or Enterprise)? The main difference seems to be the amount of cache (64 mb vs 128), but I am not sure exactly how that effects media storage in RAID1 if at all.
Thank in advance!
-Eggz
Here is the filter of drives I've narrowed my choices down to (click for link to PC Part Picker list).
I have a build almost where I want it, and now I am wrapping up some details to get my storage solution where it should be. My primary use is photography, but I definitely enjoy games. That's not relevant here, though. Losing my photo library would completely suck, and I want to setup a RAID1 to give good fault tolerance. I also back up off site, but I don't want to completely rely on that either, hence the RAID1.
Currently, I use a 2TB Barracuda for media storage. It's been great, but it's not RAID1. If you could please help me decide between which pair of 4TB drives to get, I would appreciate it. Refer to the link above for the drives.
Keep in mind that I've looked through the specs on each of the drives, so what will really help is highlighting why certain specs are more well suited for my particular use, rather than just saying that drive A has feature x whereas drive B has feature y.
I'm not brand loyal when it comes to HDD, but I've also had every WD drive I've ever owned fail on me in a relatively short time. I've also never had a Segate drive fail on me, and I have owned a lot of drives. As for Hitachi and Toshiba, I've never owned either.
Some questions I have are whether getting a non-desktop drive is worth is (e.g. NAS or Enterprise)? The main difference seems to be the amount of cache (64 mb vs 128), but I am not sure exactly how that effects media storage in RAID1 if at all.
Thank in advance!
-Eggz