Sorry about your low W.E.I. score. Have you monitored yo0ur temps and watched your CPU throttle?
I was AMD for over a decade, and now i'm jumping ship to intel, after watching what a 4770k clocked to 4.6 ghz do to an FX-8350 at 4.875 ghz to 5.0ghz , i'm completely convinced that AMD is no longer the alternative if I want to save $30.00 build.. Nobody ever tells you it will take $200.00 to $400.00 in water cooling to clock a FX-8350 up 5.0 ghz, and also that you have to have a $220.00 990FX mobo to get there, when the 4770k can perform BETTER then the FX on a $130.00 Mobo.. I watched it happen, and I watched my friend's face with the FX-8350 just start to contort, and make all kinds of excuses.. AMD isn't the budget way to go when you MUST factor in cooling cost and big PSU.
I watched a 4770k just kick the snot out an FX-8350 in benchmarks and several RTS titles, also Skyrim benches, as a matter of fact on the RTS titles with tons of units on the board, the 4770k was setting at 80% load while the FX-8350 took a nosedive loaded to 100%.. The FX-8350 was clocked to 4.7GHZ and the 4770k was at 3.9GHZ to 4.0GHZ on AIR, The FX-8350 was under water. Clock for clock 4.0GHZ (same clocks for both CPUs) the intel performed better, with similar GPUs used, RAM was OC'd for the FX-8350 to 2133mhz and change, and 4770k 2400mhz and change. The FX-8350 couldn't get the memory performance of the 4770k, and the 4770k had room to go further, the 4770k can use much higher mhz RAM.
I have completely ignored both Bulldozer and Piledriver (Zambezi & Vishera), because the oh so very slight increase in a few small areas of perfomance over my current Phenom II x6 1100t clocked at 4.278GHZ was never even close to being worth buying either a Bulldozer or Piledriver, ATM so I'm jumping ship to intel after over a decade of AMD.
Also the memory controller on the 4770k is far superior to that of the FX-8350, I watched the 4770k run memory speeds that the FX-8350 cannot hope to match on an ASRock Z87M Extreme4 micro atx Mobo that cost $120.00, while the FX-8350 was on a Crosshair V 990FX formula mobo that cost $224.99 plus another $300.00 and change in water cooling.
Everyone likes to scream and yell about AMD being cheaper, but they always FAIL to mention the additional costs that you WILL have to pay to get GOOD overclocking. Also at full load the 4770k uses around 74 to 81 watts less then the FX-8350 (8350 at 4.8ghz versus 4770k at 4.7ghz) both on water, but there really isn't any real reason to clock the 4770k that high to pull off extremely good numbers.
(gaming) On some titles you will likely not see a huge difference from either chip, on other titles you WILL, depending on the GPU you run.
Intel 4770k with Mobo = $459.00 End cost OR $70.00 to $200.00 for cooling.
FX-8350 with mobo = $424.00 (then add for water cooling or high end Air), lets say $70.00 to $200.00
End cost FX-8350 = $494.00 to $624.00 end cost
FYI, you cannot decently OC an FX-8350 on a $50.00 Mobo, cheapest I saw a good friend get away with is the Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 at $139.00, but he hit a wall.
So you have to conclude that for about the same price you can have either one or the other intel or AMD.
intel = $459.00 - $529.00 - $659.00 from stock air to water cooling.
AMD = $424.00 - $494.00 - $624.00 from stock (tiny OC), aftermarket air to water cooling.
If anyone is going to argue over what amounts to a $30.00 price difference as being a deal breaker, then they are just arguing semantics.. I don't even know why people bother arguing the intel versus AMD issue, it's already been decided.
If you plan to build $30.00 is nothing...