Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question
Solved

I suspect my GPU is a freak(in a good way), is it?

Tags:
  • GPUs
  • MSI
  • Graphics
Last response: in Graphics & Displays
Share
April 23, 2014 11:06:41 PM

So I don't ever really check the MSI afterburner stats on my GTX 660 because it never gets above 52C and it runs everything I throw at it on ultra settings with ease. But I checked it just for fun tonight after about 2 hours of gaming on ultra settings with AA cranked all the way up.

What surprised me was the core Mhz max level read out at 1,137. This surprised me because MSI rates this card as having a core Mhz of 1,033 with a boost Mhz of 1,098. Is the extra 39 Mhz just a bonus for being lucky and getting a really good chip?

More about : suspect gpu freak good

April 23, 2014 11:13:57 PM

You must be having the Gigabyte Windforce card - it has clocks that you described.
m
0
l
Related resources
April 23, 2014 11:56:22 PM

Cons29 said:
my 670 ichill stays at 49-50 mostly. up to 55 when it's hot. very nice cooler, this herculez

you got a nice card there


Since we don't know his ambient room temperature, or case cooling details it's impossible to say whether this is "great" or not. However, I think it's extremely unlikely that a particular GPU would somehow run several degrees cooler than other GPU's of the same type under the exact same conditions.

Yes, there's a small variation in overclocking potential between cards, but I don't think there's much variation in temperature between identical GPU makes at the same frequency/cooling conditions.
m
1
l
April 24, 2014 12:24:27 AM

photonboy said:
I think it's extremely unlikely that a particular GPU would somehow run several degrees cooler than other GPU's of the same type under the exact same conditions.


True, unless he has a good cooler and custom fan profile.
m
0
l
April 23, 2014 11:30:44 PM

my 670 ichill stays at 49-50 mostly. up to 55 when it's hot. very nice cooler, this herculez

you got a nice card there
m
0
l

Best solution

April 24, 2014 12:55:24 AM

RCguitarist said:
What surprised me was the core Mhz max level read out at 1,137. This surprised me because MSI rates this card as having a core Mhz of 1,033 with a boost Mhz of 1,098. Is the extra 39 Mhz just a bonus for being lucky and getting a really good chip?

No, that's perfectly normal. It's just a feature of the GPU Boost. It's designed to let the clocks run higher depending on the load, temperature, and power usage. You have your base frequency and boost frequency, as set by the manufacturer (in this case 1,033 and 1,098 respectively); these will be the same for anyone with that particular model of card. What you also have is the frequency it normally runs at under load. Now, this can vary a little, depending on the particular load being put on the GPU, but is almost always higher than the manufacturer's specified boost clock (in your case, 39 Mhz higher).

You can probably imagine that this variability makes things a little tricky when it comes to benchmarking these GPU Boost cards, which is why a lot of sites (such as [H]ard OCP) report the actual observed GPU core frequency during the tests, in addition to the card's base and boost specifications.

To give another example: I run a GTX 670 FTW. It's base clock is 1,006 Mhz, and its boost clock is 1,084 Mhz. The actual frequency it runs at however, and has done since the moment I installed it almost 2 years ago, is 1,241 Mhz (I think I got lucky :D ).

So in summary, don't worry, it's perfectly normal :) 
Share
April 24, 2014 7:09:55 AM

Thanks for the replies. I didn't realize that the ratings of core Mhz of 1,033 with a boost Mhz of 1,098 that are listed on newegg's page for the graphics card I have were just the reference speeds. I thought that those were supposed to be the factory overclock cards actual speeds. My card is an MSI 660 OC with a twin frozr 3 cooler. And my living room is usually in the low to mid 70's (Fahrenheit) temperature-wise.
m
0
l
April 24, 2014 7:15:56 AM

cst1992 said:
photonboy said:
I think it's extremely unlikely that a particular GPU would somehow run several degrees cooler than other GPU's of the same type under the exact same conditions.


True, unless he has a good cooler and custom fan profile.


My fan profile is 40% fan power until it hits 50C, then it jumps to 59% fan power and stays there until it hits 65C, then it jumps to 80% fan speed and steadily increases from there to hit 100% fan speed at 75C.
m
0
l
April 24, 2014 8:03:51 AM

I think Damn_Rookie deserves best answer for this one :) 
m
0
l
April 24, 2014 9:36:48 AM

RCguitarist said:
Thanks for the replies. I didn't realize that the ratings of core Mhz of 1,033 with a boost Mhz of 1,098 that are listed on newegg's page for the graphics card I have were just the reference speeds. I thought that those were supposed to be the factory overclock cards actual speeds. My card is an MSI 660 OC with a twin frozr 3 cooler. And my living room is usually in the low to mid 70's (Fahrenheit) temperature-wise.


GPU Boost does make things more complicated, that's for sure! Be careful with the use of the word 'reference' though, as it normally has a fixed meaning when talking about graphic cards (reference referring to reference designed cards, and the specifications of those).

The 1,033 and 1,098 Mhz speeds listed for your particular model of GTX 660 are factory overclocked values (the reference design is set at 980 base clock and 1,033 boost clock). Unfortunately they can't list on Newegg how fast your particular example will actually run when you're using it, as GPU Boost is a dynamic system, and thus the clocks can vary depending on load, as well as the nature and efficiency of the specific GPU chip in the graphics card (which can vary a lot - it's the silicon lottery!). The best they can do is list the base and boost clocks, which give you a good idea how much faster, on average, the card will be compared to the reference design, and other factory overclocked designs.

Like I said, GPU Boost makes things complicated!

Oh, and nice temperatures by the way; I wish mine were that low! :lol: 
m
1
l
!