Need help upgrading: AMD or Intel

Brendan_14

Distinguished
Aug 14, 2012
106
0
18,710
Calm your inner fan boy, please. I'm not here to argue nuances, I just need a straight answer, because searching tom's and the internet hasn't helped clear the picture too much.

I'm looking to upgrade to a GTX 770 OC, but I currently have a Phenom II X4 975 BE OC @ 3.95 (running on an AsRock 970 extreme3 w/ a Swiftech Polaris 120 Heatsink). I have a feeling that I'm going to bottleneck myself, and I don't want to do that, especially since I want to be able to play Watch Dogs (feel free to correct me if I'm wrong about my assumption).

I need to know, either should I upgrade to a higher AMD, or should I switch my Mobo over to Intel and get a CPU that can run a 770? I'm looking for the best price for performance option here please, not what fan screams the loudest.


Links:

770 (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814125463)
CPU - Current (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819103923)
Mobo (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813157394)
PSU (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817371048)

PS.

I'm looking to upgrade to an AIO liquid cooler since I'm doing CPU only, so I might be able to increase the OC on my current CPU a bit. I got to 4.2, but it wasn't constantly stable (would run for hours, but eventually it'd kick out. I think it needed more voltage).

Cooler (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16835103181)

Any and all help is greatly appreciated
 
Solution
Guys, guys, I have my answer, and I love a good discussion, but let's take the bite out of these posts. We're all friendly here and there's no need to make it personal or try and get a rise out of someone.

Each processor has its pros and cons, and you can change every variable you want on a test bench, in reality, until you make either look better than the other, so I say it's a moot point at this juncture.

I appreciate the info, but there's no need to get at each other's throats.

Just smile, and like, look at my avatar or something.

leeb2013

Honorable
There is no single answer as there are too many variables. Every thread you read about Intel vs AMD will have mixed opinions, you'll never find a thread in which everyone says AMD is best or Intel is best at doing whatever you want to do on your PC.

"Performance" is subjective too. Do you mean "best fps in watchdogs" or best performance in something else, best temps, lowest power consumption?

Typically, AMD has best performance/$, but there are reasons why they have to charge less and reasons why most people (according to the Steam survey) still choose, the generally more expensive Intel.
 

Xtwargodtx

Honorable
Dec 21, 2013
392
0
10,810
Intel i7 4770k is your best bet. U should also consider an aftermarket cpu cooler because it is haswell based ( correct me if I am wrong but I think the i7 4770k is haswell) something like a Corsair H60, Noctua D-14, and if your on a tight budget Cooler master evo 212 are all great choices
 

Brendan_14

Distinguished
Aug 14, 2012
106
0
18,710


I guess, I'm looking for a balance between performance and price honestly. Temps and noise don't bother me as much. I just want my games to be smooth and fast.




And That's what I've got in my computer tool kit haha.
 
well, if you were going with the i5 4670k then you would want a z87 board to overclock. and the i7 4770k is not the best bet, that wont leave much room for the gpu. i would go with i5 4670(K), if you dont get the K version then get a b85 board. if you specifically want high performance in watchdogs, the the xeon E3-1230 v3, because it is an i7 4770 without the graphics, and is much cheaper.
 

Brendan_14

Distinguished
Aug 14, 2012
106
0
18,710


That and I won't have to buy a new mobo/ Windows license.





But I'm curious, what's your reasoning for taking the intel over the fx 8320?
 

CTOAGN

Honorable
Dec 4, 2013
175
0
10,710
@Danbuscus The i5-3570k only outperforms in single core performance but overall the 8320 performs slightly better at a better cost. Also the 8320 has 7 more mb in the l2 cache for later quick access, Higher clock speed, Better overclocking capabilities (if op wants to OC) twice as many cores so he can run more programs, slightly better l3 cache (same benifits as l2), twice as many threads, and has a better passmark and passmark OC scores along with cinebench r11.5
 

Brendan_14

Distinguished
Aug 14, 2012
106
0
18,710
So after much consideration, it looks like the 8320 is a better price for marginal performance drop. I won't be OCing much, but I don't want to have to spend more on intel just to have to buy another mobo anyway. I'll consider another route if AMD doesn't work out next time I look to upgrade. Thank you all so much for the help.
 
ok :p so an fx 8320 and a cooler right? the hyper 212 evo is only $30 and is much quieter and will run cooler to allow more overclocking :p and regarding broadwell, it will be socket 1150, however yes it will be chipset 9 and z97, but haswell-E will run a z87 i believe.