If you don't mind losing half your storage, I would agree that RAID 10 is probably the best. Eliminates any parity calculations and will give you excellent read performance. However, you are losing half your storage space, and the write speed will only be twice as fast as a singe drive. (Write speed will be 4x as fast).
RAID 5 would give you 3TB of storage instead of 2, but the parity calculation does introduce some overhead. If you are using a hardware RAID controller the overhead will be very minimal, but if you are doing software RAID, the calculation can reduce performance.
Also, consider what you are using the volume for. If you are putting a SQL server on the volume you will want to stay away from RAID 5 all together.
Assuming you are using a Hardware RAID controller, here would be the difference between 5 and 10:
RAID 5: Size = 3TB, Write Speed = 3x, Read Speed = 3x
RAID 10: Size = 2TB, Write Speed = 2x, Read Speed = 4x