Cheapest Intel CPU that could fully utilize a GeForce GTX 780?

Mac55

Reputable
May 3, 2014
4
0
4,510
So this a future-proofing type question. I currently have an AMD Phenom II X2 @ 3.1Ghz and it's bottle-necking my GTX 750 so I would really like to upgrade my CPU soon. I'm a gamer about to head into college and do plan on saving up for upgrades to my GPU and monitor (maybe even 4k if the price really comes down). However, given my current and predicted income for the next few years in college, I need the cheapest thing I can get for my CPU that will also be very "future-proof," even with upgrades to my GPU, at least until I'm through college.

Some basic questions that I have to go with this sort of lie along the lines of: "I know CPU's can limit game performance, but up to what point? Would an i3-4130 (what I'm currently looking at now) be enough, or do I need i5-level performance? What other factors do I need to consider in terms of limiting my GPU?"

I've spent the last 6 months researching computer components and concepts but have very little actual hands-on experience as I only just assembled my first PC with mostly used components, so anything anyone could offer in response to this question or anything else I should know would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks for your time! :)

Also, I mentioned Intel in the title and the i3/5 but currently have an AMD CPU and FM2 Motherboard. The reason for considering a full brand swap is I really want a Mini-ITX system for portability at college. Intel is just sort of where my preference lies based on research, but I'm open to AMD as well. I do know they tend to be a bit cheaper, though I haven't looked at any motherboards for AMD. Oh, and the 780 is almost completely theoretical, I could barely afford my GTX 750, but I may as well be ready should I ever win one of those giveaways I entered. :p

Edit: This topic seems to be covering some similar ideas: http:// So maybe a better question might be along the lines of what might be the highest card I could get before diminishing return hit fully and the performance gain wasn't worth the cost of the next card up if I went with the i3-4130? Or more simply, what's the best performance I can reasonably get with an i3?
 

Poprin

Honorable
Dec 13, 2012
720
0
11,360
If you are building a totally new rig and miniITX then Intel is the better option. ASUS do a H81 chipset board that is very reasonably priced, if you pair that with an i3-4130 you can't go wrong it's a very strong processor and although it's only a dual core because of hyperthreading it gives the OS 4x execution cores giving it similar performance.

 

Poprin

Honorable
Dec 13, 2012
720
0
11,360


It's not the best bang for buck, it's THE best (without spending silly money)

I think your interpretation if the question is very different from mine.
 

Mac55

Reputable
May 3, 2014
4
0
4,510


If I had the money I'd have already purchased the 4670K, but it's good to hear support for the 4130. The hyperthreading was definitely a strong point, along with seeing it used in a budget build by Austin Evans. And an H81 is already in the Amazon wishlist, so that's great to hear as well.
 
It's not the best bang for buck, it's THE best (without spending silly money)

I think your interpretation if the question is very different from mine.
If you are considering a $500 (or even $300) GPU, then it doesn't make sense to go cheap on the CPU. A savings of $50 is insignificant when considering the total price of a new gaming system. And potentially bottle necking an expensive GPU would be an expensive experiment.
 

CTurbo

Pizza Monster
Moderator
If you are considering a $500 (or even $300) GPU, then it doesn't make sense to go cheap on the CPU. A savings of $50 is insignificant when considering the total price of a new gaming system. And potentially bottle necking an expensive GPU would be an expensive experiment.


So.............. what are you saying? Because the 4570 will not bottleneck ANY TWO video cards on the market.
 

Mac55

Reputable
May 3, 2014
4
0
4,510


$300 is a more likely range for me, and bottle necking is the primary concern, but bang for the buck is also critical as saving for the i5 would likely put me back a month or so in purchasing. It'd easily be worth it though if anything cheaper were to create a bottle neck after I saved up for and purchased an expensive card, which is why I ask now if I should wait and double my CPU cost. Will it still be relevant with the next series of games and cards coming out in the following four years? Another thing I'm considering is when I can afford to, after college, purchasing a completely new, high performance system and sticking the one I'm working on now beside a tv, as a media station. In that case maybe an i3 would have been enough and I could have saved $100 now to put towards a hull HD monitor or step up my current GPU. As money is a going to be a concern it's something I'm trying to look at all aspects of, and I'm in no hurry to make a purchasing mistake and regret it later. So maybe an i5 is the way to go if I really want to ramp up graphics and not have to buy a whole new CPU, or an i3 could be enough. It'd be nice to have someone who actually had an i3 and a 770 or 780, but those two are hardly seen together, which is why I have to ask.
 

Mac55

Reputable
May 3, 2014
4
0
4,510




Well there we go :) I guess that question makes a little more sense to be asking. And overall performance, price, and performance/price of the 760 is probably the most I'll need and be able to afford for some time, so an i3 4130 is probably the way to go. While I'm at it though, thoughts on limits on an i5, something like a 4670k?

Thanks for the help everyone!