Best Gaming PC Build $1400

Charj

Reputable
May 5, 2014
37
0
4,530
So i want to know what the best possible computer i could build for $1400 would be. I want to play games like Battlefield 4 and Titalfall on ultra settings with like 60fps if that is possible with this price range. I also would like a 6-core processor so i dont have to upgrade it in a while. Thanks
 
Solution
You can do something like this: (4670K beats the only 6 core in this price range the FX-6300/ also beats the 8 core FX 8350 at gaming)

PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant / Benchmarks

CPU: Intel Core i5-4670K 3.4GHz Quad-Core Processor ($234.97 @ OutletPC)
CPU Cooler: Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO 82.9 CFM Sleeve Bearing CPU Cooler ($29.94 @ OutletPC)
Motherboard: MSI Z87-G45 Gaming ATX LGA1150 Motherboard ($126.98 @ SuperBiiz)
Memory: A-Data XPG V1.0 8GB (2 x 4GB) DDR3-1600 Memory ($64.99 @ NCIX US)
Storage: Samsung 840 Series 250GB 2.5" Solid State Disk ($179.99 @ NCIX US)
Storage: Western Digital...
You can do something like this: (4670K beats the only 6 core in this price range the FX-6300/ also beats the 8 core FX 8350 at gaming)

PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant / Benchmarks

CPU: Intel Core i5-4670K 3.4GHz Quad-Core Processor ($234.97 @ OutletPC)
CPU Cooler: Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO 82.9 CFM Sleeve Bearing CPU Cooler ($29.94 @ OutletPC)
Motherboard: MSI Z87-G45 Gaming ATX LGA1150 Motherboard ($126.98 @ SuperBiiz)
Memory: A-Data XPG V1.0 8GB (2 x 4GB) DDR3-1600 Memory ($64.99 @ NCIX US)
Storage: Samsung 840 Series 250GB 2.5" Solid State Disk ($179.99 @ NCIX US)
Storage: Western Digital Caviar Blue 1TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive ($56.98 @ OutletPC)
Video Card: MSI GeForce GTX 780 3GB TWIN FROZR Video Card ($499.98 @ SuperBiiz)
Case: Corsair Carbide Series 300R Windowed ATX Mid Tower Case ($89.99 @ Amazon)
Power Supply: XFX 550W 80+ Bronze Certified ATX Power Supply ($59.99 @ NCIX US)
Operating System: Microsoft Windows 8.1 (OEM) (64-bit) ($89.98 @ OutletPC)
Total: $1433.79
(Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available.)
(Generated by PCPartPicker 2014-05-05 09:41 EDT-0400)
 
Solution

Transmaniacon

Distinguished
A couple modifications to the above build, smaller SSD, spend less on a case, and upgrade to the i7. BF4 can take advantage of more than 4 threads, and the i7 will increase longevity.

PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant / Benchmarks

CPU: Intel Core i7-4770K 3.5GHz Quad-Core Processor ($334.97 @ OutletPC)
CPU Cooler: Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO 82.9 CFM Sleeve Bearing CPU Cooler ($29.94 @ OutletPC)
Motherboard: MSI Z87-G45 Gaming ATX LGA1150 Motherboard ($126.98 @ SuperBiiz)
Memory: A-Data XPG V1.0 8GB (2 x 4GB) DDR3-1600 Memory ($64.99 @ NCIX US)
Storage: Samsung 840 EVO 120GB 2.5" Solid State Disk ($84.99 @ Newegg)
Storage: Western Digital Caviar Blue 1TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive ($56.98 @ OutletPC)
Video Card: MSI GeForce GTX 780 3GB TWIN FROZR Video Card ($499.98 @ SuperBiiz)
Case: Corsair 200R ATX Mid Tower Case ($59.99 @ Newegg)
Power Supply: XFX 550W 80+ Bronze Certified ATX Power Supply ($59.99 @ NCIX US)
Operating System: Microsoft Windows 8.1 (OEM) (64-bit) ($89.98 @ OutletPC)
Total: $1408.79
(Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available.)
(Generated by PCPartPicker 2014-05-05 09:46 EDT-0400)
 

Nick M 2014

Reputable
May 5, 2014
26
0
4,530
PCPartPicker part list: http://pcpartpicker.com/p/3EjjL
Price breakdown by merchant: http://pcpartpicker.com/p/3EjjL/by_merchant/
Benchmarks: http://pcpartpicker.com/p/3EjjL/benchmarks/

CPU: Intel Core i5-4670K 3.4GHz Quad-Core Processor ($234.97 @ OutletPC)
CPU Cooler: Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO 82.9 CFM Sleeve Bearing CPU Cooler ($29.94 @ OutletPC)
Motherboard: MSI Z87-G45 Gaming ATX LGA1150 Motherboard ($126.98 @ SuperBiiz)
Memory: G.Skill Ripjaws X Series 8GB (1 x 8GB) DDR3-1866 Memory ($79.98 @ OutletPC)
Storage: Samsung 840 Series 250GB 2.5" Solid State Disk ($179.99 @ NCIX US)
Storage: Western Digital Caviar Blue 1TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive ($56.98 @ OutletPC)
Video Card: Asus GeForce GTX 780 3GB DirectCU II Video Card ($499.99 @ NCIX US)
Case: Corsair Carbide Series 300R Windowed ATX Mid Tower Case ($89.99 @ TigerDirect)
Power Supply: EVGA SuperNOVA 750W 80+ Gold Certified Fully-Modular ATX Power Supply ($102.18 @ Amazon)
Optical Drive: Lite-On iHAS124-04 DVD/CD Writer ($19.98 @ OutletPC)
Operating System: Microsoft Windows 8.1 (OEM) (64-bit) ($89.98 @ OutletPC)
Wireless Network Adapter: TP-Link TL-WN881ND 802.11b/g/n PCI-Express x1 Wi-Fi Adapter ($18.93 @ B&H)
Total: $1529.89
(Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available.)
(Generated by PCPartPicker 2014-05-05 09:46 EDT-0400)

This is one I build a couple hours ago 130 dollars extra on your budget.
 

zAustin

Honorable
Oct 18, 2013
169
0
10,760
Titanfall and Battlefield 4 on Ultra/Highest Settings is not very hard to achieve, my 760 will play both on the highest settings 1920x1080 @ 60FPS very easily. Titanfall does however, require at least 3GB of VRAM to display the textures at those settings. If you have leftover money, throw it towards your GPU, no doubt. The rest of the specs that are in this forum are pretty well put together.
 

zAustin

Honorable
Oct 18, 2013
169
0
10,760
I own a 760, and I get those frames for those games because I own those games as well. I didn't tell him to buy a 760, I just put in my 2 cents because I own those games with a lower-end card and can still get 60+FPS on those titles.
 

zAustin

Honorable
Oct 18, 2013
169
0
10,760


How are you going to tell me how my card performs? I display FPS on Battlefield 4 every single time I play it, and the absolute lowest frame I've seen is 48 under heavy explosions or graphically intense scenes. My 760 is overclocked so high, I cannot even modify the settings any further without system lockups. Think what you want, but I own a 760 that will play Titanfall and BF4 above 60FPS with max settings 1920x1080 and it looks at those titles and just rolls it's eyes. I wouldn't throw in my two cents if I didn't own the card, or if my card didn't perform as I am saying. Battlefield requires a mid-high range card to get those frames, and Titanfall just requires a mid-range card to play on those settings. If it were Crysis 3 or something, whole different ballpark, I have to turn my settings down to High to even get 50+FPS. My 760 is far from a reference card, it's practically a stock 770
 

Charj

Reputable
May 5, 2014
37
0
4,530


You said that BF4 can take advantage of more than 4 cores. But you have a quad core CPU in this build. Sorry im just confused im new to this stuff. Also you have all suggested Intel over AMD. Is it better than AMD for gaming??
 

zAustin

Honorable
Oct 18, 2013
169
0
10,760
BF4 does take advantage of hyper-threading, but for the most part, sticking with an i5 instead of an i7 is a better option for gaming. I do find that a bit odd that he asked for a hexa-core CPU and nobody spec'd one, but I don't argue why they didn't include a hexa-core CPU in a gaming PC. Intel does make better, more durable CPU's and most people will agree (example: there's an Intel CPU in every spec created on this thread). But very little games and applications are even supported by hyper-threading technology, 90%+ being audio/video editing software programs. The only games I can think of off the top of my head that support hyper-threading is BF4 and Crysis 3. An overclocked quad-core will perform just as well in my opinion.
 

schau314

Honorable
Feb 10, 2014
943
0
11,160
You could also go this route if not overclocking.
PCPartPicker part list: http://pcpartpicker.com/p/3EF41
Price breakdown by merchant: http://pcpartpicker.com/p/3EF41/by_merchant/
Benchmarks: http://pcpartpicker.com/p/3EF41/benchmarks/

CPU: Intel Xeon E3-1230 V3 3.3GHz Quad-Core Processor ($244.99 @ Amazon)
Motherboard: ASRock Fatal1ty H87 Performance ATX LGA1150 Motherboard ($107.86 @ Newegg)
Memory: G.Skill Ares Series 8GB (2 x 4GB) DDR3-1600 Memory ($69.99 @ Newegg)
Storage: Samsung 840 EVO 250GB 2.5" Solid State Disk ($139.99 @ Micro Center)
Storage: Western Digital Caviar Blue 1TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive ($56.98 @ OutletPC)
Video Card: MSI GeForce GTX 770 2GB TWIN FROZR Video Card ($319.99 @ Amazon)
Case: Corsair 200R ATX Mid Tower Case ($57.99 @ Micro Center)
Power Supply: XFX 550W 80+ Bronze Certified ATX Power Supply ($59.99 @ NCIX US)
Optical Drive: Asus DRW-24B1ST/BLK/B/AS DVD/CD Writer ($16.99 @ Newegg)
Operating System: Microsoft Windows 8.1 (OEM) (64-bit) ($89.98 @ OutletPC)
Total: $1164.75
(Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available.)
(Generated by PCPartPicker 2014-05-05 20:54 EDT-0400)
 

Charj

Reputable
May 5, 2014
37
0
4,530


Would overclocking this be harmful or something?? Or would it be pretty much the same
 

schau314

Honorable
Feb 10, 2014
943
0
11,160
Well the xeon will perform like an i7 but is 100 dollars cheaper. Overclocking is worth it in a way, especially for getting an extra frame, but it is not cost effective. This build can;t overclock, but it will be just fine for any use. I think it has appropriate parts, what's your opinion.
 

Transmaniacon

Distinguished


Because reputable places that have done benchmarks suggest otherwise... Take a look at this benchmark: http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/geforce-gtx-780-ti-review-benchmarks,3663-5.html You can see the GTX 770 averages 53 FPS. This is also with an overclocked i7-4930K, so best case scenario. I am not saying the GTX 760 is bad card, but it physically won't do 60+ FPS with everything turned up.



If you have the budget for Intel, it is faster. Also that i7 has hyper-threading, meaning it has 8 threads instead of 4 with the i5. BF4 is one of the few games that can take advantage of hyper threading.
 

zAustin

Honorable
Oct 18, 2013
169
0
10,760
Benchmarks are for reference. To see what other people achieve with the setup(s) that they have put together. My card happens to get 65-70FPS on BF4 Ultra settings, I wouldn't keep praising my card if it didn't. When people make benchmarks, they typically use reference cards, different brands make different adjustments to the overall card itself, mine happens to be the superclocked version, paired with an overclocked 3570k, and it works wonders. But don't tell me how my card performs based on someone else's benchmark, new drivers enhance the card's performance depending on what game the driver was coded for. NVIDIA releases drivers practically release day of a new game for the best experience, and occasional fixes and improvements later on. So, because a reference 770 got 53FPS on Battlefield 4, which sounds more like 2500x1440 frames, several months ago, doesn't mean that's how they perform now. If you don't own one, don't act like you do because of something you saw on the internet.
 

zAustin

Honorable
Oct 18, 2013
169
0
10,760
I wasn't suggesting a 760. I was just putting in my input since I own those games, and I happen to get those frames that he is trying to get. If I had more money at the time, I'd have went with a 780 or higher. I'd rather have my 3 27" monitors and a really nice card.
 

Transmaniacon

Distinguished


Look, I don't know how else to put this, benchmarks are called that because they are a test that can be replicated and is accurate. These tests all use very high end hardware to eliminate any bottlenecks. Numerous benchmarks show the 760 gets about 50FPS on average at 1080P, with no MSAA, adding that drops the average down. I am well aware that is a stock card, and that overclocking will add some FPS, but not to the tune of 15-20 FPS. Maybe you are seeing these numbers on occasion, but they don't reflect the average. I have a HD7950 which is a faster card and I don't get 60FPS on average in BF4, so yes I have some basis to make that statement.
 

zAustin

Honorable
Oct 18, 2013
169
0
10,760
Lol, this is my last comment, I'm honestly done arguing with you thinking you know my system performs on BF4, you can believe a benchmark all you want, but because they used "a" 760, does not mean they used "my" 760. There are tons of different 760's made by different manufacturers that do their own adjustments to the 760 itself, and because the benchmark used "a" 760, doesn't speak for the rest of the entire 760 class, different 760's perform better than others, if you don't believe that at the very least, you shouldn't keep commenting pretending to know about Video Cards. I display frames every single time I play Battlefield 4, and if it stayed at 50FPS, I'd drop the settings. I wouldn't keep praising my card if it didn't perform as I am saying. If I remember correctly, without the overclock on my CPU, it ran about that low, but I got 5-10 frames just off the CPU OC and an additional 5-10 off the GPU OC. The only frames I see on occasion, are the frames that you are saying my card should barely get. And for the last time, my card is not a reference 760 if it performs at a similar performance of a stock 770, which is why EVGA named it "Superclocked". BF4 is a moderate-high GPU intensive and high CPU intensive game, it benefits highly from increases to both components, and is also Hyper-threaded supported (even though my CPU does not support HT, BF4 will still gain a performance increase from the OC). When I get my H90, I plan on bumping it back up to 4.6GHz for an even better performance increase.

Keep believing an outdated/invalid benchmark against someone's word who owns a 760 and plays Battlefield 4 almost everyday at 65-70+ FPS with ease. I've read plenty of recent benchmarks that say the 760 gets high 50's, low-mid 60's on BF4 max settings, so I have no idea, nor desire to know where or when you read the benchmark you speak of.

Edit: The Tom's Hardware benchmark of the 760 on BF4 was from November 2013, and the game came out in late October, if I remember correctly. It's May 2014. Drivers are updated over the months to increase performance.
 

RazerZ

Judicious
Ambassador




It's believable with the new drivers and windows 8.1 it can be played on ultra settings with 4xMsaa

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xxJGZ8VwoJA

My guess would be the frame drops on more open maps.
 

zAustin

Honorable
Oct 18, 2013
169
0
10,760


Thank you, someone with common sense. I play more Domination than anything in BF4, so the maps are quite small, but the frames do tend to drop to low 50's, just dipping into the 40's for a split second if there are tons of explosions going off and lots of people running around shooting. Running around casually, or just getting in a gunfight with a single person, frames usually stay at 65-70+ FPS throughout the game. So I can't really complain being in the card only $320.

I actually run Windows 7 Professional and it seems to run just fine.