New monitor advice

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
Solution
Rationale
Anything lower than 4-5ms is worthless, btw. It's just a random selling point to ship cheaper panels. The human eye physically cuts off around ~100-150 fps, and 5ms is 250 fps. 1ms would require 1000 fps to utilize it fully. Obviously a 144hz monitor physically can not get near 1000 fps, it locks at 144.

But yes, BenQ generally makes good monitors and that one is one of the better TN panels. I doubt you would be disappointed if you're switching from another TN panel.

27" is cutting it really close for 1080p. You should be fine though, just run good antialiasing.
Sort by date Sort by votes
Rationale

Rationale

Admirable
Mar 21, 2014
3,025
0
7,960
Anything lower than 4-5ms is worthless, btw. It's just a random selling point to ship cheaper panels. The human eye physically cuts off around ~100-150 fps, and 5ms is 250 fps. 1ms would require 1000 fps to utilize it fully. Obviously a 144hz monitor physically can not get near 1000 fps, it locks at 144.

But yes, BenQ generally makes good monitors and that one is one of the better TN panels. I doubt you would be disappointed if you're switching from another TN panel.

27" is cutting it really close for 1080p. You should be fine though, just run good antialiasing.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Solution
I

i7Baby

Titan
BANNED
Jul 25, 2012
44,084
2
106,960
It's expensive. I suppose that's to do with having 144Hz refresh rate. I'm not that into gaming where I'm dissatisfied with my 60Hz monitor. If you sit back from the monitor, then 27 in is probably a good idea. But if not too far away, then 24 in would be my choice.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts

Moderators online

Share this page

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom