Extremely slow rendering with Adobe Premiere Pro

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
Peter William

Peter William

Honorable
Oct 8, 2013
13
0
10,510
I just recently purchased a new graphics card (2047MB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650) because my old card kept crashing every time I opened photoshop or after effects. Unfortunately, now that this new card is installed, rendering videos in Adobe Premiere Pro is extremely slow (2-3 hours for a 4 minute video).

Specs:
Operating System
Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit SP1
CPU
Intel Core i5 3570K @ 3.40GHz 32 °C
Ivy Bridge 22nm Technology
RAM
8.00GB Dual-Channel DDR3 @ 666MHz (9-9-9-24)
Motherboard
ASRock Z77 Extreme4 (CPUSocket) 33 °C
Graphics
ASUS VS228 (1920x1080@60Hz)
Intel HD Graphics 4000 (ASRock)
2047MB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 (PNY) 30 °C


Do you guys have any suggestions to fix this issue?

I'm all ears...

~ Peter

 
Solution
C
...maybe you need to get a Nvidia Quadro K600 video card, wich is the one for autocad, 3d modeling etc. ...instead the any gforce wich is a consumer card.

The Quadro cards are specially for that kind of work but they are very very expensive!!!

...the Quadro K600 is and entry level and not that expensive.

....Nvidia Quadro and Nvidia Gforce are two different lines of cards with almost the same hardware specs but different applications. Quadro are a Pro cards and Gforce are consumer cards.
Sort by date Sort by votes
MrAlaweey98

MrAlaweey98

Reputable
May 4, 2014
109
0
4,690
It has to be the RAM if it is at 666Mhz I would upgrade it to 1600Mhz and the graphics card I would upgrade to the GTX 780!

Or if the 780 is not your budget then 760...... is still not 660 that is the lowest you can probably go as if you go below the 660 you will not have much of performance!

 
Upvote 0 Downvote
S

swifty_morgan

Illustrious
Feb 10, 2006
13,566
1
42,960


that's 1333. ..... 666x2 ( ddr ).

 
Upvote 0 Downvote
MrAlaweey98

MrAlaweey98

Reputable
May 4, 2014
109
0
4,690


 
Upvote 0 Downvote
D

Dblkk

Honorable
Oct 30, 2013
1,445
0
11,660
the 750 is a decent low/mid range gaming card. But for rendering it offers slower and less memeory which is the most important thing for gpu acceleration in photo/video editing. I believe the 750 has 1gb gddr5. Vs the 780 (which is a great gaming/workstation card) has I believe 4gb gddr5 with almost double the speed of the 1gb on the 750.

On another note, since you've swapped cards out, have you gone into setting in photoshop and make sure the new card is added and selected for cuda/gpu acceleration.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Peter William

Peter William

Honorable
Oct 8, 2013
13
0
10,510
Ok what do you guys think about the 2GB Geforce GTX 760 made by Nvidia? Will that be sufficient, or do I need to go with something more powerful? I bought that one from Best Buy yesterday but I can always return it.

I was also looking at the 2GB 770: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814130921

I'd like to keep the price close to $300, so if you guys have any suggestions in that price range, I'd appreciate it.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
C

capd72

Reputable
May 19, 2014
17
0
4,520
...maybe you need to get a Nvidia Quadro K600 video card, wich is the one for autocad, 3d modeling etc. ...instead the any gforce wich is a consumer card.

The Quadro cards are specially for that kind of work but they are very very expensive!!!

...the Quadro K600 is and entry level and not that expensive.

....Nvidia Quadro and Nvidia Gforce are two different lines of cards with almost the same hardware specs but different applications. Quadro are a Pro cards and Gforce are consumer cards.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Solution
D

Dblkk

Honorable
Oct 30, 2013
1,445
0
11,660
If you went up to a 760 that would be a noticeable difference over what you have now. And I return stuff to best buy, so often last time I had to sign a thing saying that they can disallow my next return if they want lol.

I also see the need for a gtx vs workstation card as you probably want to game as well. But the 760 should help out. I use the 770 (I have sli 770's but for rendering it doesn't see multiple cards) and it works normally at a 16x acceleration rate. The 780 would pump that up to 45x, which I found out after the fact, but it was out of budget at my time of purchase anyways. I don't know what the rate of the 760 is, but best guess would be around 10x. For videos this means that (depending on total number of effects) that the total time of movie would then be accelerated to 16x or 16x the frames per second. Normally cpu acceleration almost brakes even minuet for minuet of a movie (40fps). When I use my 770 it gets me almost 5-10 seconds per minuet of movie.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts

Moderators online

Share this page

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom