New dual monitor build for work/gaming

AdamSpencer95

Honorable
May 22, 2013
91
0
10,640
Hi Guys,

Looking for a bit of advice on the build I am looking to put together. I have decided on 2x 21.5inch 1080p monitors leaving approximately £450 for the actual tower only (i already have a spare copy of win 7 64 bit)

Current build list:

intel core i5-4440 (haswell)
8gb crucial ballistix ram (1600mhz)
cheap and cheerful mobo: gigabyte h81m-ds2
500gb WD green hard drive
corsair semi-modular 430W psu
msi hd7770 1gb gddr5 graphics card
lite-on dvd rewriter
antec vsk 4000e case

total price is approx £430 mainly ordering from amazon uk.

As the title suggests, it will mostly be used for work based use, multitasking with browsers, videos, converting of files etc with occasional gaming. The games i play are relatively old (ie test drive unlimited 2, gta 4 etc) and hence I THINK the graphics card should be powerful enough, correct me if im wrong. I wont be gaming in 1080p on both monitors, likely 720p on a single monitor; dual is only useful for work.

In addition, is 430w likely to be sufficient for this set up? Initial calculations suggest anything over 300w should be okay but i want to check. Upgrading is unlikely within the near future and hence i dont need to leave any headroom for powering more graphics cards.

In this price range, would it make more sense to go AMD? The games I play will not make full use of 6/8 cores but Intel have a much better performance per core ratio. Alternatively, would an i3 suffice? Or even an ivy bridge processor?

Cheers
Adam
 
Solution
430W is more than sufficient.
You could certainly go AMD, productivity wise their price/performance ratio improves.
What's really missing is an SSD. If you're wanting to sit in front of your machine for many hours a day, opening programs, etc... an SSD just makes the whole system way more responsive. You turn the machine on and can immediately start opening your programs, no more of the waiting 1 minute for the programs to open in the background before you computer is usable.

It depends how important 'converting of files' (I assume you mean video files?) is to you. If it were my work machine, I'd trade down to an i3 and grab an 120GB SSD in a heartbeat. It will dramatically slow down any CPU intensive tasks that can use 4...
430W is more than sufficient.
You could certainly go AMD, productivity wise their price/performance ratio improves.
What's really missing is an SSD. If you're wanting to sit in front of your machine for many hours a day, opening programs, etc... an SSD just makes the whole system way more responsive. You turn the machine on and can immediately start opening your programs, no more of the waiting 1 minute for the programs to open in the background before you computer is usable.

It depends how important 'converting of files' (I assume you mean video files?) is to you. If it were my work machine, I'd trade down to an i3 and grab an 120GB SSD in a heartbeat. It will dramatically slow down any CPU intensive tasks that can use 4 cores (which video encoding/transcoding can). Video might take half as long again to encode. However, it won't make a difference for older games, Office tasks, browsing and the like, and the SSD will give the system a major boost.
 
Solution