Solved

i7 4770K VS. FX-9590

To elaborate on the title, I am building a new rig and i have started to edit and render videos. So i was wondering which would give me better rendering times in Sony Vegas? I am rendering at 1080p @ 60 fps.

This is just a simple question that i can't seem to get an answer to because most other posts are about gaming and not rendering where these cpu's thrive.

Or would a FX-8350 do just fine?
10 answers Last reply Best Answer
More about 4770k 9590
  1. the i7 4770k is much better than the 9590.

    the 9590 isnt as powerful, and it uses MUCH more power, and requires ATLEAST water cooling.
  2. 1. A 9590 is only a overclocked 8350 that is barely any better.
    2. For any sort of memory intense task, INtel wins.

    That being said, the I7 4770K is better in every single way. However if you are looking to save some money, the 8350 AMD will serve you well.
  3. I would go with a Xeon 1230v3. You will get near i7 4770 performance for less, and it will out perform the FX 9590. You can use less expensive motherboard then as well, putting some more money into graphics. Sony Vegas works with GPU as well.

  4. DON'T BUY THE 9000 SERIES CPU's they are thermal garbage , 4770k or 8350 are more that enough with 16 gigs of ram for the software you want to run.

    My pick: 4770k.
  5. logainofhades said:
    I would go with a Xeon 1230v3. You will get near i7 4770 performance for less, and it will out perform the FX 9590. You can use less expensive motherboard then as well, putting some more money into graphics. Sony Vegas works with GPU as well.



    Just curious what speeds i would get with the evga 780Ti Classy i am getting? And so jusst to make sure, the FX-8350 is the good for my needs and i will be overclocking both.
  6. You should expect to hit around the same as titan. (Give or take).
  7. vmN said:
    You should expect to hit around the same as titan. (Give or take).


    Out of curiousity, how come only around the titan range, it really doesn't matter. Jus that the 780 does better than the titan.
  8. "Lower is better".

    The titan and 780 ti, is almost the same GPU. The 780ti is the full "unlocked", it feature more cores, faster memory and so on.

    However the titan have some few workstation features that might help.
  9. Best answer
    Josh Jacobs said:
    logainofhades said:
    I would go with a Xeon 1230v3. You will get near i7 4770 performance for less, and it will out perform the FX 9590. You can use less expensive motherboard then as well, putting some more money into graphics. Sony Vegas works with GPU as well.



    Just curious what speeds i would get with the evga 780Ti Classy i am getting? And so jusst to make sure, the FX-8350 is the good for my needs and i will be overclocking both.



    I would not get the 780ti if you want to use it for Sony Vegas. A 290x would serve you better, going by the benchmark listed.
  10. logainofhades said:
    Josh Jacobs said:
    logainofhades said:
    I would go with a Xeon 1230v3. You will get near i7 4770 performance for less, and it will out perform the FX 9590. You can use less expensive motherboard then as well, putting some more money into graphics. Sony Vegas works with GPU as well.



    Just curious what speeds i would get with the evga 780Ti Classy i am getting? And so jusst to make sure, the FX-8350 is the good for my needs and i will be overclocking both.



    I would not get the 780ti if you want to use it for Sony Vegas. A 290x would serve you better, going by the benchmark listed.


    Thank you all for the responses. It has helped a lot. I am gonna do some more research but I have a feeling i will go with a r9 290
Ask a new question

Read More

Rendering Intel i7 AMD CPUs