FX 6300 vs i3 4150 ( for Adobe Premiere Pro )

Norbert Kusmierczyk · Jun 2, 2014

Hello! Which processor ist better in Adobe Premiere Pro and gaming?
2 my sets:
1. FX 6300 @3,5 Ghz ( Turbo ) + GTX 750 Ti ( Palit Dual )
2. i3 4150 + GTX 750 Ti ( Palit Dual )

Thanks for answers

kittencake · Jun 2, 2014

you'lle better off with the 6300, the i3 is only a dual core that and the clock speed is crap and isnt all that great for overclocking

logainofhades · Jun 2, 2014

AM3+ is a dead end. The i3 cores are far stronger than the FX. You would have to overclock the FX to beat an i3 4150. Go with an i3 4150 and an H97 board, so you have broadwell upgrade path.

kittencake · Jun 2, 2014

logainofhades :

i3's are nothing but a bottle neck the 4150 scored very POORLY vs a amd a10 7850k apu, I highly doubt it would even come close to a fx series and I wouldn't even waste the money considering its priced pretty close to an 8350 , the guy is getting you to waste his money on a intel chip and scored the lowest in cinibench r15

http://www.hardwarezone.com.sg/review-intel-core-i3-4150t-performance-preview

Norbert Kusmierczyk · Jun 3, 2014

And which processor is better for Adobe: FX 6300 vs i3 4150, please tests and results.

GhislainG · Jun 3, 2014

Even though the i3 4150 isn't included (they used the i3 3240), you can certainly draw your own conclusion: http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/fx-8350-8320-6300-4300_7.html

Norbert Kusmierczyk · Jun 3, 2014

o thanks, graphic card for adobe? GTX 750 Ti is good for this program? There are better propositions?

logainofhades · Jun 3, 2014

kittencake :

That is the 4150T, which is a totally different chip. That is a low wattage CPU, and clocked slower. The 4150 is a 3.5ghz chip, vs a 3.0ghz 4150t. Also, that review is using IGP, which AMD's is better with. AMD is using 2133 ram, vs the 1600 ram of the i3. Sorry, but that so called review is junk.

Norbert Kusmierczyk · Jun 3, 2014

eh... http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/fx-8350-8320-6300-4300_7.html
i3 3240 and i3 4150 it is very Similar. Haswell and Ivy Bridge it's very similar ( small difference )

Norbert Kusmierczyk · Jun 3, 2014

And GTX 750 Ti is better for adobe or better choice is R7 265 ? ( and games )
FX 6300 + GTX 750 Ti vs FX 6300 + R7 265

GhislainG · Jun 3, 2014

Norbert Kusmierczyk :

Unless you overclock, the i3 4150 will be faster than FX processors.

logainofhades · Jun 3, 2014

Norbert Kusmierczyk :

You can get an R7 270 for near the price of the either of those right now. I still say i3 is the better choice.

Norbert Kusmierczyk · Jun 4, 2014

But FX is better in rendering video

But in graphic card anvantage is less, Yes?

logainofhades · Jun 4, 2014

Norbert Kusmierczyk :

If you take advantage of Adobe's capability to use GPU, then the CPU doesn't matter as much. In gaming, the i3 is faster, unless you overclock the FX, which costs more money, better spent towards GPU.

Due to the pricing of H97 boards, it isn't a huge price difference, but in the class of cards you are looking at, it could easily be the difference between a GTX 750ti and an R9 270x.

nameer kp · Mar 2, 2015

iam using i3 4150 for 3 months.its amazing and it runs at very low temperature (35C).intel is best for editing videos and gaming if you have a dedicated graphics card

Search

FX 6300 vs i3 4150 ( for Adobe Premiere Pro )

Norbert Kusmierczyk

Reputable

kittencake

kittencake

Reputable

logainofhades

Titan

kittencake

Reputable

Norbert Kusmierczyk

Reputable

GhislainG

Titan

Norbert Kusmierczyk

Reputable

logainofhades

Titan

Norbert Kusmierczyk

Reputable

Norbert Kusmierczyk

Reputable

GhislainG

Titan

logainofhades

Titan

Norbert Kusmierczyk

Reputable

logainofhades

Titan

nameer kp

Reputable

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts

Moderators online

Share this page