770 2GB vs. 4GB for 3 monitors

casualphoenix

Honorable
Oct 3, 2013
7
0
10,510
Hey everyone,

So I currently have a triple monitor setup: 3 x 1680x1050 = 5040x1050 "single display." I also currently have a Radeon HD 5850 video card (1 GB DDR5) running all 3.

I'm looking at probably getting a GTX 770 (think I can afford that, instead of a 760), but I'm wondering about 2GB vs. 4GB. I've heard a lot of talk from a lot of people, and what I can surmise so far is that for a single monitor setup, 2GB will hold you for a while (especially if you're just going to buy another single card somewhere down the road and save money that way, as opposed to doing SLI with a couple).

However, I've heard conflicting information about 2GB vs. 4GB for multi-monitor setups. Some say 2GB is fine if you're not doing SLI (which I'm not planning to), others say that games like BF4 are already reaching/slightly exceeding the 2GB limit and you should future-proof with 4GB, etc.

I'd love to have your feedback on 2GB vs. 4GB 770s specifically for my triple-monitor setup. Thanks in advance!
 

Scampi

Reputable
May 26, 2014
666
0
5,660
Iv'e also read about all these arguments, and can't find anything conclusive either.

Seeing as your on a budget, the 3GB R9 280X would be a good compromise. It performs similarly to the GTX 770, costs the same or less & you get extra Vram included.
 
seriously i would be looking for 290x / 780ti for such set up. 2gb of vram wont suffice and 4gb even if it will, it wont be utilized properly by 770. such setup really requires a lot of horsepower for sutisfactory performance especially on latest games.!i would save money for upcoming 780ti 6gb or grab a 290x 4gb
 

casualphoenix

Honorable
Oct 3, 2013
7
0
10,510


What about the noise issues I've heard about with the R9 290? I've also heard that it depends on reference vs. non-reference versions.