I am currently looking at graphics cards and being as I know that the 760 beats the normal 270x in almost every scenario, What about the 270x TOXIC vs a 760? How much difference is there between performance IN GENERAL?
Ugh 2 free games, 1 free game. I like the MSI cooler better, but...I think the Sapphire wins for best value. I hate Sapphire, yet I have owned many Saphhire GPUs for the very reason of aggressive pricing.
Well your making the game unfair already, a non-reference 270x vs a reference 760? well ofc the 270x toxic is going to win. If you find a non-reference 760 like EVGA, MSI or Gigabyte then the 760 takes the crown
Sorry, I was should of added, I was looking at a MSI 760, and the Sapphire 270x. Herpa derp. So your saying, the 760 still would be better? By what margin?
Go either really. If you are looking at the toxic i presume you like the aesthetic of it than the MSI twin Frozr cooler, then you can choose that.
The R9 270X toxic will trade blows with the GTX 760, so it will depends on what games favour which gpu.
Ugh 2 free games, 1 free game. I like the MSI cooler better, but...I think the Sapphire wins for best value. I hate Sapphire, yet I have owned many Saphhire GPUs for the very reason of aggressive pricing.
If I could find a reputable retail site that sells the hawk at a reasonable price "new" I would buy that. BUT, there isn't one that I have found XD. So In end result, I'm thinking I'm going to go with the TOXIC. Only because, My MOBO only supports Crossfire, and games in the future that are featuring AMD have my attention.
Even the fastest factory overclocked 270X is going to lose by a significant margin to even a stock GTX 760. The MSI 270X Hawk comes out of the box at 1140 MHz.