270x Toxic or GTX 760

Atreyix

Honorable
Jul 3, 2013
54
0
10,640
I am currently looking at graphics cards and being as I know that the 760 beats the normal 270x in almost every scenario, What about the 270x TOXIC vs a 760? How much difference is there between performance IN GENERAL?
 
Solution
Ugh 2 free games, 1 free game. I like the MSI cooler better, but...I think the Sapphire wins for best value. I hate Sapphire, yet I have owned many Saphhire GPUs for the very reason of aggressive pricing.
Go either really. If you are looking at the toxic i presume you like the aesthetic of it than the MSI twin Frozr cooler, then you can choose that.
The R9 270X toxic will trade blows with the GTX 760, so it will depends on what games favour which gpu.
 


No,
Like:
- Shadowplay
- G-Sync
- PhysX
- TXAA
- hardware streaming (uses same NVENC encoder Shadowplay uses. Useful for local Steam streaming)

Of the above most people care about Shadowplay but G-Sync is a huge deal if you'll be updating your monitor in the lifetime of your video card.
 

Atreyix

Honorable
Jul 3, 2013
54
0
10,640
If I could find a reputable retail site that sells the hawk at a reasonable price "new" I would buy that. BUT, there isn't one that I have found XD. So In end result, I'm thinking I'm going to go with the TOXIC. Only because, My MOBO only supports Crossfire, and games in the future that are featuring AMD have my attention.

Thanks everyone!!
 
Even the fastest factory overclocked 270X is going to lose by a significant margin to even a stock GTX 760. The MSI 270X Hawk comes out of the box at 1140 MHz.

perfrel_1920.gif

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/MSI/R9_270X_HAWK/26.html