New to the community. Thank you in advance for your hospitality and assistance.
First build since 2008. Replacing an AMD FX-9950 Black, OC'd @ 2.9GHz (stock 2.6GHz), been OC'd since 2008. Running Win XP 32-bit (needless to say, it's time)...
Which is the better way to go using a Gigabyte G1-Sniper Z97 and a i7-4790k? ...
Each of the following G-Skill Trident X memory modules falls within my budget and the goal is maximum performance for a variety of applications.
(2x) F3-2400C9D-8GTXD vs. F3-2400C10D-16GTX (16 GB memory total, price no object in this specific case).
I.e., given identical frequencies, is it better to go with: 2 modules, 8 GB each, CAS 10, timings 9-11-11-31 OR 4 modules, 4 GB each, CAS 9, timings 10-12-12-31? (never mind the fans, both are rated @ 1.65v)
For this CPU (i7-4790k) would either make a noticeable difference on the memory controller (MC)?
What about having to access 4GB on a module vs. 8GB on a module?
Other than increasing total memory count, what advantages does having 4 DIMM slots have - especially if you know that you are not going to max out memory (not going to use 32GB) - i.e., does using 4 DIMMs open up 2 other "channels" which help data to "flow" or does it bottleneck at the MC?
Thanks again for any light any of you can shed... Peace.
Last replyBest Answer
More about2400c9d 8gtxd 2400c10d 16gtx
2x8GB - gives you tighter timings and less stress on the MC (memory controller) with only two sticks (ever, ever so slightly also only running the the signals through 2 pipes rather than 4... The Tri 2400/10 sticks are great, have a full 32 GB set in my IB build...and no there is no advantage to 4 sticks over two on a dual channel mobo, unless going 32GB - and having more DRAM
Thanks! Tradesman1, you sir are a true gentleman in ever sense of the word and a well educated scholar. Peace.