Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question
Solved

Is this PC capable of running BF4 1080P 60+FPS?

Tags:
  • Peripherals
  • Build
  • Systems
Last response: in Systems
Share
June 8, 2014 12:49:36 PM

http://uk.pcpartpicker.com/p/62gJmG

That is my current build. I have a limited budget of £500 which I am frustratingly exceeding. Please keep in mind I have peripherals and operating system.

More about : capable running bf4 1080p fps

June 8, 2014 12:56:28 PM

I have a fairly similar build and I run bf4 @1080p max settings at 80+fps, dont worry you'll run it fine.
m
0
l
June 8, 2014 1:00:59 PM

Not a solid constant 60, no, but probably pretty close to it. Probably between 40-50 FPS most of the time with dips both below and upwards according to benchmarks. However, newer updates have come out since then so you may see better, but on the counterargument they also used very expensive CPUs for their benchmarking so I don't know. for one I will say with my overclocked 6350 at 4.4 GHz and GTX 770, I see average ultra framerates depending on the map and action of between 50-80 FPS... it varies like crazy.
m
0
l
Related resources

Best solution

June 8, 2014 1:14:25 PM

Should run the game just fine(but probably not 60+ on ultra). If you havent bought the PSU yet I would suggest swapping it out for a better unit(CX series uses cheap secondary capacitors that have longevity and heat issues). You can get a much better 550w XFX around the same price. http://uk.pcpartpicker.com/part/xfx-power-supply-p1550s... . If the budget is a big concern drop the SSD until you can get a 120Gb(or larger) drive to run the OS on. The 760g chipset kinda sucks. It have few vrms so little to no overclocking. I made a few changes to your build and it's now under 500 and has a better motherboard, PSU, and cpu cooler.
PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant / Benchmarks

CPU: AMD FX-6300 3.5GHz 6-Core Processor (£71.99 @ Aria PC)
CPU Cooler: Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO 82.9 CFM Sleeve Bearing CPU Cooler (£25.24 @ CCL Computers)
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3P ATX AM3+ Motherboard (£64.77 @ Amazon UK)
Memory: G.Skill Ripjaws X Series 8GB (2 x 4GB) DDR3-1866 Memory (£59.91 @ Ebuyer)
Storage: Western Digital Caviar Blue 1TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive (£39.50 @ Amazon UK)
Video Card: Sapphire Radeon R9 270X 2GB Dual-X Video Card (£129.00 @ Amazon UK)
Case: NZXT Source 210 Elite (Black) ATX Mid Tower Case (£38.65 @ Scan.co.uk)
Power Supply: XFX 550W 80+ Bronze Certified ATX Power Supply (£46.98 @ Aria PC)
Optical Drive: Samsung SH-224DB/RSBS DVD/CD Writer (£12.76 @ CCL Computers)
Total: £488.80
(Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available.)
(Generated by PCPartPicker 2014-06-08 21:11 BST+0100)
Share
June 8, 2014 9:38:09 PM

apcs13 said:
Not a solid constant 60, no, but probably pretty close to it. Probably between 40-50 FPS most of the time with dips both below and upwards according to benchmarks. However, newer updates have come out since then so you may see better, but on the counterargument they also used very expensive CPUs for their benchmarking so I don't know. for one I will say with my overclocked 6350 at 4.4 GHz and GTX 770, I see average ultra framerates depending on the map and action of between 50-80 FPS... it varies like crazy.


It also depends if you are playing 64 player games are not.
m
0
l
June 9, 2014 7:20:02 AM

sora said:
apcs13 said:
Not a solid constant 60, no, but probably pretty close to it. Probably between 40-50 FPS most of the time with dips both below and upwards according to benchmarks. However, newer updates have come out since then so you may see better, but on the counterargument they also used very expensive CPUs for their benchmarking so I don't know. for one I will say with my overclocked 6350 at 4.4 GHz and GTX 770, I see average ultra framerates depending on the map and action of between 50-80 FPS... it varies like crazy.


It also depends if you are playing 64 player games are not.


It's Battlefield on PC, why would you not play 64 players?
m
0
l
!