Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

Why i can't get steady fps with gtx 770?

Tags:
  • Gtx
  • Graphics
  • FPS
  • Skyrim
Last response: in Graphics & Displays
Share
June 10, 2014 11:03:04 AM

So i throw around 400$ for a piece of shit that can't max out skyrim? In skyrim on 1440x900 ultra fxaa am getting from 55-70 fps wtf i though i will max out the game 100000000fps..well not that amount but 60 fps and more no dips in ac4 i get 45-60 wow on high... wtf. ok ac4 is poorly optimizated but still why i can't get atleast 50-60fps on ultra cmon am playing on 1440x900 in watch dogs high shader medium water ultra msaa i get 40-70 fps in town 41-46 why? other places 50-60 why do i get so low fps? :(  rest of my system gtx 770 msi twin frozr i5 3350p 8 ram 1600mhz

More about : steady fps gtx 770

June 10, 2014 11:09:28 AM

You're looking at AC:4 and Watch Dogs for performance stability? lol both are horribly optimized.

As for Skyrim, it has VSync always on, so you can't get more than 60 FPS.

Everything you listed is about right for 770 performance. On another note, why did you get the 4GB 770?
m
0
l
June 10, 2014 11:12:11 AM

BleedingEdgeTek said:
You're looking at AC:4 and Watch Dogs for performance stability? lol both are horribly optimized.

As for Skyrim, it has VSync always on, so you can't get more than 60 FPS.

Everything you listed is about right for 770 performance. On another note, why did you get the 4GB 770?


No am with the 2gb
m
0
l
Related resources
June 10, 2014 11:33:07 AM

I run both AC4 (Ultra) at average of 55 FPS, and Watch Dogs (High/Ultra) at average of 52 FPS on my GTX 770 at 1080p.
Though I got 4770k CPU and 2133mhz RAM, and my 770 is OC'ed to 1.3 GHZ in-game.
Those games are poorly optimized tough, and cards are behind the times though.
Since nVidia didn't had to hurry much, since AMD just recently catch up.
m
0
l
June 10, 2014 11:52:13 AM

KryssNova said:
I run both AC4 (Ultra) at average of 55 FPS, and Watch Dogs (High/Ultra) at average of 52 FPS on my GTX 770 at 1080p.
Though I got 4770k CPU and 2133mhz RAM, and my 770 is OC'ed to 1.3 GHZ in-game.
Those games are poorly optimized tough, and cards are behind the times though.
Since nVidia didn't had to hurry much, since AMD just recently catch up.


Wtf how? mine cpu is perfect for ac4 for wd no but why i can't get same fps as you in ac4
m
0
l
June 10, 2014 11:59:27 AM

simply, because your cpu is a long way behind his, skyrim is a cpu heavy game, although i find it kind of bad that my gtx670 with an i5 3570k was knocking out 60fps in ultra with mods on skyrim 1080p, what HDD or SSD are you using? also, try turning down the draw distance in skyrims settings, that should do your system a world of good.
m
0
l
June 10, 2014 12:01:09 PM

As I said earlier, Skyrim uses VSync no matter what, and cannot go above 60 FPS....
m
0
l
June 10, 2014 12:04:39 PM

tomsmithy666 said:
simply, because your cpu is a long way behind his, skyrim is a cpu heavy game, although i find it kind of bad that my gtx670 with an i5 3570k was knocking out 60fps in ultra with mods on skyrim 1080p, what HDD or SSD are you using? also, try turning down the draw distance in skyrims settings, that should do your system a world of good.


As i know mine i5 3350p is almost same as yours ofc if you din't oc it also i did some changes now i run it on ultra 70 fps but still i get dips dunno why i don't have mods though also can rly ssd or hdd affect the fps? i have wd blue 1tb 7200 rpm or whaterver it is
m
0
l
June 10, 2014 12:08:23 PM

that hdd should run it fine, skyrim is a bit of a bitch when you are in an area with multiple characters on screen, thats when you will experience frame drops, it also happens when the draw distance is set too high when youre in the open world, keeping it low is essential. also i had my i5 running at 4.5ghz, so it was well beyond yours which helped a lot admittedly. and yes, a hdd can make a big difference, a great example is that my ssd can load a bf4 multiplayer game in under 20 seconds, my 500gb sata II HDD struggled to do it in under 2 minutes.
m
0
l
June 10, 2014 12:12:20 PM

tomsmithy666 said:
that hdd should run it fine, skyrim is a bit of a bitch when you are in an area with multiple characters on screen, thats when you will experience frame drops, it also happens when the draw distance is set too high when youre in the open world, keeping it low is essential. also i had my i5 running at 4.5ghz, so it was well beyond yours which helped a lot admittedly. and yes, a hdd can make a big difference, a great example is that my ssd can load a bf4 multiplayer game in under 20 seconds, my 500gb sata II HDD struggled to do it in under 2 minutes.


I know that the ssd is better at loading yes but you said something bout fps and i was supprised :D 
m
0
l
June 10, 2014 12:16:41 PM

An SSD will NOT affect the FPS performance of a game at all. Load times, yes, but not frame rate.
m
0
l
June 10, 2014 12:28:12 PM

1 thing I forgot to mention.
I run on Windows 8.1, which I think is pretty darn good platform.
Faster than Win 7 and less buggy to be honest, after all that patching they did since release, it's working flawlessly.
The apps open and react are faster, it also got better support for gaming now-days.
After recent update it got some good points from old version and it is even more intuitive than before, and long shot more than Win7.
m
0
l
June 10, 2014 12:31:40 PM

yes, fps slowdown can occur for the same reason, because it loads slower, but as i said, on your HDD it shouldnt be an issue, but im sure you know that watchdogs runs like a pig on anything, including the consoles, and assassins creed 4 i cant say i had a problem with, but then again a gtx 690 really shouldnt have had a problem with anything at 1080p. but i digress, you should have no problems in skyrim if you reduce the draw distance, other tahn occasional minor stutters because of that games poor pc optimisation
m
0
l
June 10, 2014 12:32:22 PM

KryssNova said:
1 thing I forgot to mention.
I run on Windows 8.1, which I think is pretty darn good platform.
Faster than Win 7 and less buggy to be honest, after all that patching they did since release, it's working flawlessly.
The apps open and react are faster, it also got better support for gaming now-days.
After recent update it got some good points from old version and it is even more intuitive than before, and long shot more than Win7.


Hm i hear only negative thing bout win 8 but if really affect the fps and improves it i'l get it!
m
0
l
June 10, 2014 12:32:50 PM

Denis Stoikovski said:
KryssNova said:
1 thing I forgot to mention.
I run on Windows 8.1, which I think is pretty darn good platform.
Faster than Win 7 and less buggy to be honest, after all that patching they did since release, it's working flawlessly.
The apps open and react are faster, it also got better support for gaming now-days.
After recent update it got some good points from old version and it is even more intuitive than before, and long shot more than Win7.


Hm i hear only negative thing bout win 8 but if really affect the fps and improves it i'l get it!


Here is some other example:
https://forums.geforce.com/default/topic/629089/battlef...

I think it's because the system works more fluid with the Register, etc...
Overall when you open programs, apps, games they feel more fluid.
and with 8.1 recent update, you don't really have to use the Tablet Screen, also after some time of it's usage it feels lot better than Win7.
m
0
l
June 10, 2014 12:35:00 PM

i currently use win 8.1, its really solid, just takes some getting used to
m
1
l
June 10, 2014 12:40:22 PM

tomsmithy666 said:
i currently use win 8.1, its really solid, just takes some getting used to

Exactly.

Also that video you are watching is from Win8.0 and 2012.
The latest version is VERY SOLID.
Also I used Win7 for gaming since it first came out, until 5 months ago when I got Win8.1
Was against getting Win8 hearing so much bad about it, and trying it only for 20 minutes on my friends PC.
It was weird how he actually liked system at that time.
Now I wouldn't go back, and it actually bring performance boost to games and have better optimization recently over Win7.
m
0
l
June 10, 2014 12:49:06 PM

KryssNova said:
tomsmithy666 said:
i currently use win 8.1, its really solid, just takes some getting used to

Exactly.

Also that video you are watching is from Win8.0 and 2012.
The latest version is VERY SOLID.
Also I used Win7 for gaming since it first came out, until 5 months ago when I got Win8.1
Was against getting Win8 hearing so much bad about it, and trying it only for 20 minutes on my friends PC.
It was weird how he actually liked system at that time.
Now I wouldn't go back, and it actually bring performance boost to games and have better optimization recently over Win7.


So the software is the issue but the gpu and cpu are ok?
m
0
l
June 10, 2014 12:52:58 PM

There is no issue.
I thing Win8.1 is better over Win7, performance and intuitiveness wise.
Both in-game and application wise.
m
1
l
!