Dual core processor for gaming?

Milanello

Honorable
Dec 11, 2013
12
0
10,510
Ok, so I remember back in the day when quad cores just started hitting the market, and I shamefully bought one right away just to discover that when I played with my new expensive rig on new games as well as old they could barely use more than 1 or 2 cores.

Older games like Rome Total War is pointless for many cores, which let me down when I got a new expensive rig years ago, and I dont want to make that mistake again, thinking more is better, as I dont need my computer to do a 100 different things at once when I play games, and most games arent optimized for many cores etc last time I checked.

I havent played computer games for a while as my rig isnt up to partying anymore, but my question is this: would a strong dual core setup still be good for most future games?

Example setup:

Corsair CS 750M, 750W PSU
ASUS MAXIMUS VII RANGER
Intel Core i3-4350 Socket-LGA1150, Dual Core, 3.6GHz
Noctua NH-L9i CPU cooler
Kingston DDR3 HyperX 1866MHz 16GB
EVGA GeForce GTX 780 3GB PhysX CUDA

Would this work for games at max settings even though I have an old dual core CPU in there?

I would want to play games like the new Rome 2 (with mods ofc) and the old Rome, which is bad for multi cores, on maxed settings.

Help, tips are much appreciated :)


 
Solution
That CPU will bottleneck that GPU like no tomorrow. Go with this CPU and motherboard combo instead. Games are starting to take advantage of more cores. BF4, Crysis 3, and Watch Dogs for example. This will give you i7 4770 performance for less cost than if you bought the i7.

PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant

CPU: Intel Xeon E3-1230 V3 3.3GHz Quad-Core Processor ($249.98 @ SuperBiiz)
Motherboard: ASRock H87 Pro4 ATX LGA1150 Motherboard ($90.98 @ SuperBiiz)
Total: $340.96
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
Generated by PCPartPicker 2014-06-12 20:31 EDT-0400

logainofhades

Titan
Moderator
That CPU will bottleneck that GPU like no tomorrow. Go with this CPU and motherboard combo instead. Games are starting to take advantage of more cores. BF4, Crysis 3, and Watch Dogs for example. This will give you i7 4770 performance for less cost than if you bought the i7.

PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant

CPU: Intel Xeon E3-1230 V3 3.3GHz Quad-Core Processor ($249.98 @ SuperBiiz)
Motherboard: ASRock H87 Pro4 ATX LGA1150 Motherboard ($90.98 @ SuperBiiz)
Total: $340.96
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
Generated by PCPartPicker 2014-06-12 20:31 EDT-0400
 
Solution
Newer games are starting to use more cores, so in new titles that i3 might lag behind, especially on multiplayer games.
It would be really strong in most games, and it would be able to handle some nice GPUs.
Still, it's always better to have a very good 4 core intel cpu, or a high end AMD cpu. Most people here recommend the i5-4670k (if you plan to overclock) or the i5-4570, as this CPU would be able to handle basically any game with any gpu, on max settings.

Therefore, that i3 would be a really good CPU for many situations, but not enough to fully take advantage of such a strong GPU as the 780. It would be a lot better to get the i5.

EDIT: That Xeon is the BEST one if you dont want to overclock. It's not expensive and the performance is great all around. Forgot about that one...
 
On a budget, you can't have everything.
But, here is another BF4 benchmark for an overclocked G3258:
http://www.digitalstormonline.com/unlocked/intel-pentium-g3258-gaming-benchmarks-idnum299/
Amazing chip. Other such benchmarks are validating the assertion that most games are happy with few fast cores

But... that is for single player. Multiplayer probably really needs a good quad.