Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

Ubisoft and again with their ''Next gen ac'' again..

Tags:
  • Video Games
  • Western Digital
  • Next Generation
  • Low Res
Last response: in Video Games
Share
June 13, 2014 2:44:06 PM

So am getting very pissed that i get 40-64 fps on 1440x900 notice what low res am playing at with msaa 4x envoirment quality normal(which is almost low..) shadows very high reflection high vsync off all things off lol and i got gtx 770 msi oc edition wtf is wrong with them??????? do i need to change whole pc every year for their ''next gen games'' which have graphics like gta 4(watch dogs) and shittiest psychics again wd even sleeping dogs got better than wd also they stole their name lol nvm so i love the ac series they are great history,missions everything but the optimization man.... so the new ac unity looks pretty good it have co-op and i would really like to play it but should i get it? If i throw 60$ at the air for medium settings on 1440x900 with 30fps forget it! do some of you guys know something bout good optimization at it or something? Also this one ac graphics looks great for first time they look good for their year! So i saw req at game debate gtx 470 for ultra at it so my 770 is overkill but still in ac4 it needed gtx 460 for ultra and i barely get 60 fps on 1440x900 with the 770. Thanks for the replies sorry for the whining but am mad i screw myself again. And now am hoping for optimizations at the games.

More about : ubisoft gen

June 13, 2014 3:21:24 PM

Ubisoft has a history of doing rather shoddy and poorly optimized PC ports, they consider the consoles to be their primary platform, while the PC version is an afterthought that they will release several months late because they believe 99% of the PC players will pirate the game. They also have gone on record saying they don't have to optimize their games on PC because they can just tell the customer to buy better hardware.

Bottom line is never expect 60 FPS solid on an Ubisoft title, no matter what hardware you have, their games are just that poorly coded. If you have a console, it may be better to buy their games there rather than on PC. If you must get them on PC, I would wait for a very steep discount and not pay full price.
m
0
l
June 13, 2014 3:27:53 PM

Denis Stoikovski said:
So am getting very pissed that i get 40-64 fps on 1440x900 notice what low res am playing at with msaa 4x envoirment quality normal(which is almost low..) shadows very high reflection high vsync off all things off lol and i got gtx 770 msi oc edition wtf is wrong with them??????? do i need to change whole pc every year for their ''next gen games'' which have graphics like gta 4(watch dogs) and shittiest psychics again wd even sleeping dogs got better than wd also they stole their name lol nvm so i love the ac series they are great history,missions everything but the optimization man.... so the new ac unity looks pretty good it have co-op and i would really like to play it but should i get it? If i throw 60$ at the air for medium settings on 1440x900 with 30fps forget it! do some of you guys know something bout good optimization at it or something? Also this one ac graphics looks great for first time they look good for their year! So i saw req at game debate gtx 470 for ultra at it so my 770 is overkill but still in ac4 it needed gtx 460 for ultra and i barely get 60 fps on 1440x900 with the 770. Thanks for the replies sorry for the whining but am mad i screw myself again. And now am hoping for optimizations at the games.


What's your CPU? All of Ubisoft's games are notoriously CPU heavy. They're also badly optimized, but at least half the problems listed about the AC games come down to weak CPUs.

Also, never trust game debate. When they run the official specs they're okay, but their "adjusted" specs are just random crap.
m
0
l
Related resources
June 14, 2014 12:42:15 AM

Supernova1138 said:
Ubisoft has a history of doing rather shoddy and poorly optimized PC ports, they consider the consoles to be their primary platform, while the PC version is an afterthought that they will release several months late because they believe 99% of the PC players will pirate the game. They also have gone on record saying they don't have to optimize their games on PC because they can just tell the customer to buy better hardware.

Bottom line is never expect 60 FPS solid on an Ubisoft title, no matter what hardware you have, their games are just that poorly coded. If you have a console, it may be better to buy their games there rather than on PC. If you must get them on PC, I would wait for a very steep discount and not pay full price.


Better hardware? Rly those pricks said that? Wtf what do they want 2x titans with i7 4th gen and 16 ram for their shitty graphics games with shitty physics i admit the games are awesome but the graphs and other things from the game play sucks! So what i need do buy the game to run it better or get a 5k pc?
m
0
l
June 14, 2014 12:45:41 AM

Rationale said:
Denis Stoikovski said:
So am getting very pissed that i get 40-64 fps on 1440x900 notice what low res am playing at with msaa 4x envoirment quality normal(which is almost low..) shadows very high reflection high vsync off all things off lol and i got gtx 770 msi oc edition wtf is wrong with them??????? do i need to change whole pc every year for their ''next gen games'' which have graphics like gta 4(watch dogs) and shittiest psychics again wd even sleeping dogs got better than wd also they stole their name lol nvm so i love the ac series they are great history,missions everything but the optimization man.... so the new ac unity looks pretty good it have co-op and i would really like to play it but should i get it? If i throw 60$ at the air for medium settings on 1440x900 with 30fps forget it! do some of you guys know something bout good optimization at it or something? Also this one ac graphics looks great for first time they look good for their year! So i saw req at game debate gtx 470 for ultra at it so my 770 is overkill but still in ac4 it needed gtx 460 for ultra and i barely get 60 fps on 1440x900 with the 770. Thanks for the replies sorry for the whining but am mad i screw myself again. And now am hoping for optimizations at the games.


What's your CPU? All of Ubisoft's games are notoriously CPU heavy. They're also badly optimized, but at least half the problems listed about the AC games come down to weak CPUs.

Also, never trust game debate. When they run the official specs they're okay, but their "adjusted" specs are just random crap.


I5 3350p yeah i don't like gd but their ultra predicted are actaly true sometimes like in wd they said gtx 780 and i7 4th gen and i was like wut? are they drunk or something 3 months later saw a dude with same cpu they want 16 ram and gtx 780 ti and he got like 30-80 fps avg 56 wtf on 1080p nothing special am really starting to hate those guys at least why don';t they make the games with good graphics for those req if you're asking me wd looks like a game that needs for ultra an i5 3570k and a gtx 560ti and 6 ram for ultra.
m
0
l
!