Hello hello,
A while ago i bought the amd fx-8350 8-core processor, and 2 sapphire R9 270x-overclock edition.
Ofcourse, since i first had a radeon 4650, i was very sattisfied (grammar?) with the 2r9's, and my amd.
Though, i found out that it would've been better if i bought an intel, instead of this amd, since it "bottlenecks".
for examle, these cards have 2gb GDDR5 memory, and a core-clock of 1085, each.
yet, i still play battlefield hardline on medium with ~30 fps, and i feel i should have a lot more.
my actualy question is: Is this because of my amd? and if so: if i get myself an i5, how much more fps should i have?
Thanks in advance.
A while ago i bought the amd fx-8350 8-core processor, and 2 sapphire R9 270x-overclock edition.
Ofcourse, since i first had a radeon 4650, i was very sattisfied (grammar?) with the 2r9's, and my amd.
Though, i found out that it would've been better if i bought an intel, instead of this amd, since it "bottlenecks".
for examle, these cards have 2gb GDDR5 memory, and a core-clock of 1085, each.
yet, i still play battlefield hardline on medium with ~30 fps, and i feel i should have a lot more.
my actualy question is: Is this because of my amd? and if so: if i get myself an i5, how much more fps should i have?
Thanks in advance.
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram