(btw, best not to quote my entire post. ;D)
Guliver1977 writes:
> Well this is an amazing post helped actually a lot. ...
It's been my standard MO for dealing with SGI upgrade advice for
almost 20 years, but now I enjoy doing the same thing with PC issues. 8)
> transferred from external hard drive,so when i removed 2 bricks it
> works well.(But i will come to this issue at later point)
Oh I see!
> Regarding my cooler it is Zalman 9900 :
Hmm, that's a pretty low-end cooler really. Thus, if you did switch
to something like an H100i (plenty of space in your case), it should
give you some extra headroom to boost the CPU clock if you did want
some extra CPU speed. I've built two HAF 932 systems with H100i
units & four fans, so it should fit ok in a HAF X (much the same
case inside?).
> Another thing i have not mention would be my monitor it is Samsung
> Sync master XL2370 :
Ok, so 1920x1080.
> Yet another question is...should i change my monitor with graphic
> card as well? This is my thoughts:
Up to you I guess. I can certainly confirm that 2560x1440 looks
pretty damn good.
That's my work monitor though; my gaming
monitor is 1920x1200. Because I like to play games with all details
utterly maxed out (16x AA, etc., custom LOD distance, all that sort
of thing), I decided not to switch to a higher resolution for gaming
until I can really improve the gfx performance, akin to at least
780Ti SLI.
> 1.I get 1080i monitor with higher frequency (100Hz or more) And here
I assume you mean 1080p.
> is why , if I had good graphic card which is capable of running more
> than 60 frames i would get smoother performance with more frames.
Or of course if your system is fast enough, have a higher quality IPS
display and simply run with frame sync turned on, so no tearing at
all and very smooth. This is the route I chose, though one exception
is Crysis - even with 580 SLI (remember, that's faster than a 780
or even a 780Ti sometimes), I have the detail & settings customised
so high that I get about 45fps, but it does look awesome:
http://www.sgidepot.co.uk/misc/crysispics.zip
(those pics are slightly out of date, I captured them before customising
the draw distances for characters, objects, far trees, etc., so it
looks even better in reality; I wanted to be able to see tiny things
from far away, and not see any detail level changes as I approached
scenery)
I know many gamers are happy with intermediate levels of detail,
but I'm a fussy git.
I'm playing slightly older games, so I
tend to use two former top-end GPUs obtained 2nd-hand (580s in this
case) so I can run such games at uber insane detail and high frame
rate. To explain what I mean, Crysis is the worst case example,
whereas Crysis2 is over 60, Stalker/Oblivion even more, and Far Cry 2
runs well over 100fps. 8)
> 2.or get higher resolution monitor with 60 hertz (i have not
> researched this)
My big gripe with high-refresh TN panels is their really awful
narrow viewing angle. Indeed, larger screens show colour shift
even from the angle difference between the sides and centre when
one is sitting directly in front of the screen.
My monitor is a 24" 1920x1200 IPS (I like the extra vertical height,
really makes a difference for web browsing, etc.) If I'm showing
something to someone standing next to me, they see the same image
I do (170 degree viewing angle with little image change).
If I was buying a new monitor today, I'd get a 2560x1440 IPS, and
make sure once more that my GPU setup was fast enough to drive
it nicely (eg. 780Ti SLI).
Oh, don't bother with 4K gaming. Single GPUs aren't yet powerful
enough to handle 4K at acceptable detail levels, and the connection
technology standards haven't yet matured. Plus we really need to see
midrange cards moving solidly beyond 3GB RAM in order for VRAM to not
be an issue at high detail levels. AMD is slightly ahead of the game
in this respect, but personally I prefer NVIDIA for their more
reliable drivers. As I say I recently obtained a 7970, alas it came as
no surprise that I started seeing driver oddities that I just don't get
with NVIDIA cards, eg. peculiar DX error when starting Unigine (failed
to change resolution to full screen mode).
Performance-wise though, AMD cards certainly have the speed, eg.
290X CF, and I think there's a version with 8GB RAM.
Btw, that is perhaps another reason why you could just get another
580 in the meantime and then replace them entirely with a couple
of Maxwell cards when they come out, ie. on the assumption that a
midrange Maxwell will have 6GB RAM or whatever.
People had been expecting NVIDIA to release a 6GB 780Ti, but it seems
NVIDIA changed their mind for fear of harming Titan sales (dumb IMO).
Anyway, I would say if you added another 580 as an interim measure,
or replaced it with a 780Ti and kept the 580 for extra PhysX/CUDA,
then your existing monitor would be fine, but if you upgraded to a
2560x1440 then - depending on the degree of detail you prefer in
games - you might find a single 780Ti isn't enough, hard to say (varies
greatly between games of course though).
> also(i tested the speakers) so I was wandering if maybe my
> motherboard is acting up.
Yikes, that does sound like a possibility.
> In either case I was wandering if push comes to shove could I be free
> enough to contact you in regard of purchasing one of gtx580 from you,
> or if needed motherboard too? ...
Sure, no problem! I don't have a relevant mbd at the moment, but I
can help you find one. The same Asrock I have would be ideal I guess,
or one of the top ASUS boards, but it's been a while since I've hunted
for X58 boards (recently I've focused on X79 - obtained four in recent
weeks).
> ... Because if you say i would get nice upgrade with sli for far
> less money i would invest in it and save money for maxwell.
Overall I reckon that's probably the best path, assuming you stuck
with your 1080 monitor for the time being. You could always combine
a Maxwell SLI upgrade with a 1440 monitor purchase.
Ok, so now I'm getting envious!
> And thank you for commenting on my build i was researching it for 2
> months prior to ordering parts. And one big thank you for your effort.
> Really means a lot.
Most welcome! As it happens, the researching I've been doing for
other reasons has covered similar ground (6-core systems, I/O issues,
resolution, etc.) and was heavily focused on 580s because of their
CUDA power.
I do have two spare 580s atm, but they cost a bit too much (about 150 each);
probably better to source a fresh one for a better price.
Anyway, no rush!
Btw, I was going to say you might find that obtaining a replacement
X58 board could be expensive. It depends on the model though, reason
being that Gigabyte was one of the few suppliers to provide full
support for XEON CPUs on its X58 boards (I've seen UD3Rs go for really
crazy amounts), the other relevant supplier being Asrock (eg. atm I'm
benching a XEON X5570 with my Extreme6). Hence, if you did want to
replace your mbd, it'd be cheaper to get an ASUS I reckon. Checking...
There's not a lot on eBay UK just, except for this:
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=171366923747
I guess it varies from day to day. Not sure why there are so few
X58 boards listed just now.
I bought my recent X79 boards from here:
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=271472703165
but alas that seller doesn't have any X58 boards atm. Their boards don't
come with I/O shields, so I got those from a place in Germany.
Strangely, there is a really mega X79 board listed atm (normally costs
450+ new):
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=251564405963
but of course one would need a relevant CPU to use it (costly,
about 250 UKP for a used 3930K). Lesser X79s go for much smaller
amounts though, eg. my Gigabyte UD3 was only about 65 (very entry
level; supports 4-way SLI/CF, but it has no POST debug LED or onboard
Start/reset buttons). Asrock X79 Extreme4s are around 100. For gaming,
a Rampage IV Extreme would be ideal, but even those are 100 to 150
(parts-4pcs has one listed atm for 155, item 290969283551, but again it
has no I/O shield; only other good listing is item 251567373877 - actually
I might bid on that anyway.
)
Perhaps better to sort the GPU first, leave the mbd issue for later? In
the interm a more relevant X58 might turn up, so then you wouldn't
have to switch CPUs. Indeed, if you could find another X58 UD5 then you
wouldn't have to reinstall either.
Ian.
PS. I did some digging, Vegas Pro does support GPU acceleration, but it
seems to be OpenCL only. Though NVIDIA isn't the best for OpenCL, it
would certainly work ok. I've been trying to find a way of directly comparing
OpenCL to CUDA on the same NVIDIA GPU for the same task, looks like
CUDA is about 20% faster or more, but it may vary. Apps seem to pick one
or the other, but sometimes both which is crazy, eg. Photoshop is mostly
OpenCL or OpenGL, but one of the plugins is all CUDA. Why can't they
support both... *sigh*