For the CX:
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Corsair/CX600M/5.html
For the XFX:
http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/XFX-PRO-750-W-Power-Supply-Review/1182
what i meant by slowly suffocating and reducing life-spans is ripple suppression and voltage regulation, the more stable the power delivery is the more efficient it can be utilised and so the longer the parts live with better oc potential. CX is low tier 3, the XFX is high tier 2, that just says it all
...I'm not implying that the CX line is bad, but its just not good enough to power a high-end system safely and efficiently. It's in the hard facts found out by testing by professionals . I just wouldn't trust the CX line with a high-end system that especially utilises sli...as for the money, some people say, the CX line is very good. That is indeed true, but that does not necessarily make the CX a good choice
EDIT: another slightly more detailed review of an XFX pro psu
http://www.legitreviews.com/xfx-pro-series-850w-black-edition-psu-review_2239/6 the voltage fluctuation on this is 1.5% while on the CX its 2.4% on the 12v line, that is a massive difference