Low FPS in WoW

imperiects

Honorable
Jan 5, 2014
18
0
10,510
I am trying to figure out why my FPS is so bad wen playing WoW. Every other game I play (BF3/4, Titanall, Dark Souls 2) perform flawlessly. I friend of mine just built a similar PC and he pull 70-130 fps in populated areas. I can only get that if I'm staring at a wall.

AMD FX8120
ASRock Fatal1ty 990FX Killer
GTX 770
2x8Gb DDR 3 1600 corsair Vengeance
SDD/HDD Hybrid 1Tb

I have tried reducing the cores from 8 down to 2 (2 at a time) and it didn't help performance. I have all settings set to high performance.
 
Solution


It has a very poor per core performance(the previous generation of Phenom IIs had better per core performance) and games like wow that only use 2 threads will suffer from this. In passmark benchmarks(which uses all cores) the 8120 scores 6599, the 6350 scores 7041, so even with 2 more cores the 8120 is slower. The cores of the 6350 are~20% faster than the 8120.

bignastyid

Titan
Moderator
What cpu is your friend running? My bet would be the 8120, as it is based on bulldozer(also known as faildozer). It has a very poor per core performance(the previous generation of Phenom IIs had better per core performance) and games like wow that only use 2 threads will suffer from this. Overclocking will help but the only cure is a new cpu(8320 or 8350, even a 6300 would be faster in wow). The other games can use more cores or aren't as cpu dependent so the problem is not as noticeable.
 

imperiects

Honorable
Jan 5, 2014
18
0
10,510
My friend has the FX 6300.. Next Gen for AMD 6 core. I didn't think that it would be that much of a difference. He has 4Gb Ram, GTX 670 and FX 6300 on the same motherboard.

I was looking at swapping to an FX 6350. I figured the problem was the 8120. I am just not sure why.

Would I better off just getting the 8350 black edition or the 6350?
 

bignastyid

Titan
Moderator


It has a very poor per core performance(the previous generation of Phenom IIs had better per core performance) and games like wow that only use 2 threads will suffer from this. In passmark benchmarks(which uses all cores) the 8120 scores 6599, the 6350 scores 7041, so even with 2 more cores the 8120 is slower. The cores of the 6350 are~20% faster than the 8120.
 
Solution