Gents:
Considering upgrade from U_12.04 to U_14.04 when sys-manager presents the option. So I'm sensitive about opportunity costs vis installing a non-systemd OS_version.
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2014-May/019657.html
In this post Poettering baldly states his new-init-replacement (for everything) **systemd** will require new kernels. Tail wags dog as we used to say. Anyrate does this imply an non-systemd U_14.04 is made non-updateable even before it is released to UBUNTU U_12.04 sys-lusrs ? Am I wasting my time with a dead-end OS_varient ? Yes or no ??
Serious issue ... are the (RH) GNOME gnomes trying to write Linux out of *nix and so destroy/outdate all, but their own cancerous init-code? Not Linux no more may be the meme I'm smelling, but honoring its writer do name-change to POETTERY cause it breaks-so-fast!
http://
Considering upgrade from U_12.04 to U_14.04 when sys-manager presents the option. So I'm sensitive about opportunity costs vis installing a non-systemd OS_version.
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2014-May/019657.html
In this post Poettering baldly states his new-init-replacement (for everything) **systemd** will require new kernels. Tail wags dog as we used to say. Anyrate does this imply an non-systemd U_14.04 is made non-updateable even before it is released to UBUNTU U_12.04 sys-lusrs ? Am I wasting my time with a dead-end OS_varient ? Yes or no ??
Serious issue ... are the (RH) GNOME gnomes trying to write Linux out of *nix and so destroy/outdate all, but their own cancerous init-code? Not Linux no more may be the meme I'm smelling, but honoring its writer do name-change to POETTERY cause it breaks-so-fast!
http://
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram