- Jun 29, 2014
- 48
- 0
- 4,530
Should i get the GTX 770 or R9 290?
- Thread starter dreadlyknife
- Start date
prit87
Splendid
- Jun 16, 2014
- 6,457
- 0
- 22,960
r9 290
Significantly more memory 4,096 MB vs 2,048 MB
Significantly higher pixel rate 60.6 GPixel/s vs 33.5 GPixel/s
Higher memory bandwidth 320 GB/s vs 224 GB/s
Better floating-point performance 4,800 GFLOPS vs 3,213 GFLOPS
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 14,570 vs 11,310
Significantly more energy-efficient idle power consumption 87W vs 109W
Significantly more render output processors 64 vs 32
Slightly better 3DMark06 score 32,300 vs 29,690
More shading units 2,560 vs 1,536
Significantly wider memory bus 512 bit vs 256 bit
Higher texture rate 152 GTexel/s vs 134 GTexel/s
More texture mapping units 160 vs 128 32
gtx 770
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 7,012 MHz vs 5,000 MHz
Higher clock speed 1,046 MHz vs 947 MHz
Significantly more energy-efficient load power consumption 246W vs 381W
Much quieter load noise level 46.7 dB vs 57.2 dB l
Significantly higher turbo clock speed 1,085 MHz vs 947 MHz
Much higher memory clock speed 1,753 MHz vs 1,125 MHz
Quieter idle noise level 38.2 dB vs 39.5 dB
Lower TDP 230W vs 300W Around 25% lower TDP
Significantly more memory 4,096 MB vs 2,048 MB
Significantly higher pixel rate 60.6 GPixel/s vs 33.5 GPixel/s
Higher memory bandwidth 320 GB/s vs 224 GB/s
Better floating-point performance 4,800 GFLOPS vs 3,213 GFLOPS
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 14,570 vs 11,310
Significantly more energy-efficient idle power consumption 87W vs 109W
Significantly more render output processors 64 vs 32
Slightly better 3DMark06 score 32,300 vs 29,690
More shading units 2,560 vs 1,536
Significantly wider memory bus 512 bit vs 256 bit
Higher texture rate 152 GTexel/s vs 134 GTexel/s
More texture mapping units 160 vs 128 32
gtx 770
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 7,012 MHz vs 5,000 MHz
Higher clock speed 1,046 MHz vs 947 MHz
Significantly more energy-efficient load power consumption 246W vs 381W
Much quieter load noise level 46.7 dB vs 57.2 dB l
Significantly higher turbo clock speed 1,085 MHz vs 947 MHz
Much higher memory clock speed 1,753 MHz vs 1,125 MHz
Quieter idle noise level 38.2 dB vs 39.5 dB
Lower TDP 230W vs 300W Around 25% lower TDP
- Jun 29, 2014
- 48
- 0
- 4,530
- Jun 29, 2014
- 48
- 0
- 4,530
- Jun 29, 2014
- 48
- 0
- 4,530
shadow32
Honorable
- Aug 8, 2013
- 881
- 0
- 11,160
Yes and no. Yes, running the card hotter than what it is rated for, will shorten it's lifespan.
However, the 290 is rated for a higher temperature than most cards.
What model of the 290 are you looking at? If it is a non-reference design, than hands down, get the 290.
TRENDING THREADS
-
-
-
Question Help in troubleshooting possible graphics card issue?
- Started by nort99
- Replies: 3
-
Question RX 6600 visual glitches right after upgrading to it- Started by Wamek
- Replies: 4
-
News US sanctions transform China into legacy chip production juggernaut — production jumped 40% in Q1 2024- Started by Admin
- Replies: 35
-
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram