Ferrariassassin :
TigerTechnician :
Ferrariassassin :
TigerTechnician :
Ferrariassassin :
Hmm well my i3 on my laptop has intel hd 4000 igpu and it runs Battlefield 3 and 4 on low settings no problem at a great frame rate. But thanks man.
No problem. I'd keep that laptop around if you ever decide to try installing XP on it.
I use the i5-2500K and i5-3570K and they both run XP games on it no problem. I just wish Intel had programmed the HDCP into the XP driver so I could use my Blu-ray player instead of using Vista to do it.
Well i have never played a game that is so old that it needs XP. I play modern games such as BF3, Dead Spacee, and so on. Any games that are older than 6 years i just play on my PS2 or so on lol I really do not think i will downgrade to Windows XP from my Windows 8.1 though.
Yeah, I wouldn't necessarily call XP a downgrade. In some ways it feels like an upgrade. It runs super fast even on 1GB of RAM and with 4GB even better. Any excess memory you can use it as a large ramdrive. You could setup a dual OS boot if you wanted to have XP and Window 8.1 running on the same system. XP would perform smoother and quicker too using less resources. An installation of XP SP3 uses only 1.6GB when fully installed. Windows 8.1 uses about 20GB. I tested XP SP3 vs Vista SP2 and XP seemed way more responsive using Crysis 1 as the test subject. The fact that it is a clean OS installation free of bloatware and smaller footprint would make it run amazingly fast.
Although I can't see using an Intel HD 4000 on Windows 8.1 being that great for games. I would think most of the newer games made for Windows 8.1 are more graphic intensive and would slow to a crawl on anything higher than low settings.
If you check out www.gog.com or some old steam games there are plenty that run under XP just fine.
But honestly the games you've listed are way to too new for it because they were released during the time of Vista and Windows 7. I'd use a discrete graphics card to play those games on. The games that would run fine on the Intel HD 4000 would probably be in early 2001-2004 and that's stretching it a bit. The closest equivalent to a discrete graphics card performance would be a HD 6450. It maybe just a little more powerful. I know the HD 3000 was just about equal to it and sometimes it felt a little more sluggish when playing Blu-ray movies.
As for the PS2 ouch.
I thought you said PS3 but I read it wrong.
I still got my PS2 still sealed in the box. I plan to open it one day to play half a dozen PS2 games that are still sealed. I bought it because my PS3 FAT boy missed the PS2 backward compatibility cut off model.
Hha ye ai still have my PS3 FAT, it got the yellow light of death after 6 years but it did great. Now i have a PS3 Slim. The new PS3 models are crap i mean they are so ugly, and the quality is horrible. I mean it has a tray you need to push down than you snap the CD in it lol. And i know all Igpu are crappy all i was asking is what are some other game sit can handle, that was all i was asking, just the names of some games i could play until my PC build is done. But thanks man, appreciate it.
My PS3 FAT never suffered any YLOD or RLOD. It did suffer a laser light of death. One day playing a Blu-ray it started stuttering and the picture jammed. I reset it and it couldn't read any discs. I thought it was a goner but I gave it a shot and bought a replacement laser on eBay for under $20 and fixed it myself and it works just like it did brand new. I never really played any PS3 games on it mainly Blu-ray.
But during that time period I had figured how to play my Blu-rays on XP and used only about 35 Watts total.
The PS3 FAT used like 115 Watts and it got pretty hot too. The only cool thing about the PS3 was you could play movies in double speed with the audio.
I never updated the Rom above v3.15 because if you did you lost the option to install "OTHER OS".
The other reason I resorted to the PC to play Blu-ray was because newer Blu-ray movies needed you to update the AACS keys and the only way you could do that on a PS3 was to update the Firmware. No way was I updating it above v3.15.
Also, I remember when I first got it brand new, if you left a PS3 game or Blu-ray in the drive and turned it on it would auto play it. One revision I updated to possibly after v2.70 altered that and it stopped auto playing the disc I left in the PS3. That was a major beef with the firmware updates since you couldn't revert back.
What's the point of waiting for the PS3 to boot up and then clicking the play button?
Anyhow, last Black Friday I bought 3 of those so called PS3 slims. And yes I agree the sliding door and the quality seems cheap. I think they did a better job with the PS2 slims. The only good thing about the PS3 slims are they use less wattage and are a cooler running the PS3 FATs.
I think they were $200 each so I might end up selling them or just using them for multiplayer since PS3 online play is FREE!
As for the Intel HD 4000, some great games I did manage to play was Crysis 1 on low settings.
Another old shooter based on the Quake 3 engine was an underrated game called Star Trek Voyager: Elite Force. You can still download the demo online. Battlefield 2 should work. Fallout 1, Starcraft 1, Half-Life 2, Fear, Battlefield 1942, and Unreal Tournament.
For games that might run on Windows 8.1? Hard to say. I think maybe Crysis 1 64 bit, Fallout 3, World of Warcraft, Starcraft 2, and Grand Theft Auto IV. I think most of these aren't too intensive and can get by on low settings. Most of these Vista games should work on Windows 8.1 with some compatibility tweaking.
Not all of the newer games are great. Sure they might have some extra flash eye candy like Transformers 4. But some really good games have a great story and replayability. I know there are some www.gog.com games that support Windows 7 which Windows 8.1 should be backward compatible and they are starting to release new games soon and their own online gaming network GOG Galaxy in the future.
If you are looking for a great graphics card that can do XP, Vista, 7, and 8 and haven't bought anything yet the best bang for the buck performance low wattage pick for a rear single slot GTX 750 is the Asus GTX750-PHOC-1GD5. This is first graphics card from nVidia that caught my eye. I loved the Sapphire Ultimates from AMD but the GTX 750 is the best performance to wattage efficient card I've seen in a long while. The last card I almost went for was the HD 7750 but it was missing the video connectors I wanted and the GTX 750 is double the performance and equal wattage so now I have no reason to get it. This should perform even better than two HD 7750 using CrossfireX.
http://www.asus.com/Graphics_Cards/GTX750PHOC1GD5/
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1034240-REG/asus_gtx750_phoc_1gd5_geforce_gtx750_oc_1gd5.html
$125 Tax Free and Free Shipping from New York
The Asus GTX750-PHOC-1GD5 is the only video card I could locate that has the old legacy VGA, DVI-D, and HDMI all on a single rear slot bracket unlike most other brands that use up two rear brackets. This makes this a prime card to try and turn into a passive card.
The only other better performer is the EVGA GeForce GTX 750 Ti Superclocked
http://www.evga.com/Products/Product.aspx?pn=02G-P4-3753-KR
Sells for $150 usually but I found this site marking it down to $130 if you buy right away.
http://www.ncixus.com/products/?sku=94331&promoid=1286&gclid=CJ-pgOHJ2L8CFUcV7AodcSYAFQ
This is also a great card but my only beef is I hate adapters that stick out the back and the DVI-D to VGA adapter is just something I'd rather not have jutting out the back when I use VGA. But those who want a taste of G-sync might choose this card.
It uses two rear slots and the vents allow dust, bugs, and pet fur to go in and I can't have that stuff in my passive system.
What is going into your new build?
Do you already have a good discrete graphics card? What are you using now?