Suggest me a security suite! (urgently needed)
Tags:
- Windows Defender
- Malware
- Internet Security
- Trojan
- Antivirus
- malwarebytes
- Firewalls
- Security
Last response: in Antivirus / Security / Privacy
Rangan Das
July 19, 2014 8:32:17 AM
So, the 2015 versions of the security suites are being released and I am badly in need of one for my desktop. I have tons of projects, college work and documents that I just cannot afford to lose.
I was using Malwarebytes Anti-Malware that I purchased long back. I upgraded, but it was not worth it. Even, Windows Defender on my Windows 8.1 Enterprise Ed detected a malware that Malwarebytes completely skipped. I had to get rid of it using Bitdefender's 60 second scanner. Windows is also kept updated.
My activities include a lot of work involving Adobe Photoshop, Lightroom and Illustrator. Then, there is Visual Studio, JDK, Hyper-V and more. Most of them take up a lot of resources (I mostly run Visual Studio and Illustrator in parallel). So, I need an Anti-Virus, or maybe a security solution (yes, I do most of my shopping online).
Until now, I have never needed an AV as Windows Defender and Malwarebytes used to do a good job. However, my system got attacked by a FakeChrome Trojan (I do not even use Chrome, mostly Firefox and IE11) and now, I feel the need to get a good AV that will not slow down my system.
So, I need a suggestion. In terms of budget, I can spend upto 5,000INR or maybe, I can go a bit more. But, I must be sure that my system is totally protected. I can also spend a bit more given that it gives me peace of mind!
P.S. I have used Bitdefender Windows 8 security for a while (180 days) that I got free of cost when I purchased the Windows 8 Enterprise Edition from the store. It has expired now. Should I/Can I renew that?
Also, I play games, the newest titles, but not an avid gamer.
Config:
Windows 8.1 Enterprise Ed. (up-to-date with Update 1)
AMD FX-8320 8-core @ 4.0 GHz with CM Hyper TX-3 Cooler
AMD Radeon HD 7850 2GB DDR5
2x Kingston 4GB DDR3 RAM
HDD: 256GB + 2TB + 1TB ext.
I was using Malwarebytes Anti-Malware that I purchased long back. I upgraded, but it was not worth it. Even, Windows Defender on my Windows 8.1 Enterprise Ed detected a malware that Malwarebytes completely skipped. I had to get rid of it using Bitdefender's 60 second scanner. Windows is also kept updated.
My activities include a lot of work involving Adobe Photoshop, Lightroom and Illustrator. Then, there is Visual Studio, JDK, Hyper-V and more. Most of them take up a lot of resources (I mostly run Visual Studio and Illustrator in parallel). So, I need an Anti-Virus, or maybe a security solution (yes, I do most of my shopping online).
Until now, I have never needed an AV as Windows Defender and Malwarebytes used to do a good job. However, my system got attacked by a FakeChrome Trojan (I do not even use Chrome, mostly Firefox and IE11) and now, I feel the need to get a good AV that will not slow down my system.
So, I need a suggestion. In terms of budget, I can spend upto 5,000INR or maybe, I can go a bit more. But, I must be sure that my system is totally protected. I can also spend a bit more given that it gives me peace of mind!
P.S. I have used Bitdefender Windows 8 security for a while (180 days) that I got free of cost when I purchased the Windows 8 Enterprise Edition from the store. It has expired now. Should I/Can I renew that?
Also, I play games, the newest titles, but not an avid gamer.
Config:
Windows 8.1 Enterprise Ed. (up-to-date with Update 1)
AMD FX-8320 8-core @ 4.0 GHz with CM Hyper TX-3 Cooler
AMD Radeon HD 7850 2GB DDR5
2x Kingston 4GB DDR3 RAM
HDD: 256GB + 2TB + 1TB ext.
More about : suggest security suite urgently needed
-
Reply to Rangan Das
sgtmasterD
August 4, 2014 7:30:30 AM
MeteorsRaining
August 4, 2014 11:24:50 AM
QuickHeal total security without doubt, I'm a VFX under graduate and use similar programs for VFX and video rendering with a lot of gaming, online shopping, browsing and stuff. I've used it for a year now and I came across no issues thus far. Its really cheap @INR 1299. My experience with Avast, Mcafee and AVG were not that pleasant though. My pick: QuickHeal Total Security 1 year single user edition. FYI I got many viruses using Avast and AVG, so they're a big no-no from me. Mcafee's internet firewall is weak. Quick Heal is very good in both terms, go for it!
-
Reply to MeteorsRaining
m
0
l
Related resources
- Urgent need of Your Help to suggest me For buying a new Laptop.. plz!!! - Forum
- Need to create a Secured dedicated server ? suggest me with requirements ? - Forum
- Suggest me some games which suites my PC - Forum
- HELP me urgently... i need to upgrade - Forum
- I need a security suite for my new build. - Forum
MeteorsRaining
August 4, 2014 11:26:41 AM
Bitdefender Internet Security is a fantastic suite.
Please use the following link to directly access this chart with the selected data: http://chart.av-comparatives.org/chart1.php?chart=chart...
Please use the following link to directly access this chart with the selected data: http://chart.av-comparatives.org/chart1.php?chart=chart...
-
Reply to SR-71 Blackbird
m
0
l
Tom's Guide did a round-up of the security suites and put Bitdefender as the #1 product.
See here: http://www.tomsguide.com/us/best-anti-virus-software,re...
See here: http://www.tomsguide.com/us/best-anti-virus-software,re...
-
Reply to lourson
m
1
l
Skylyne
September 17, 2014 2:18:50 PM
I've used a fair amount of the antivirus/firewall tools out there... and, for me, nothing has beat Comodo. The real reason I like Comodo is it's the best free security suite I know of; the only thing you would ever have to pay for is their customer service. If you really need customer service, because you don't know how to run an a/v software, then Comodo won't really be too friendly to you. Personally, I don't ever use customer service, since they're usually reading from a script, or they have to remote into your machine (which I don't like, for obvious ironic security reasons), so I stick with their free security suite only. Here's a link to check out both free and paid products- Comodo PC Security
Also, any security suite you get will slow your computer; the only difference between the them is how much you notice it. For me, Comodo doesn't really take up very many resources at "idle" (meaning with a few common applications running, like chrome/IM/etc., but with no browsing traffic being transmitted). In fact, here's how much memory it uses for me. Of course, it varies from computer to computer; however, unlike many antivirus programs I've used in the past, it is a lightweight background process.![]()
Now, I haven't seen it slow down any programs, or games, yet, but it definitely could; just like all other security suites. The upside to Comodo is they include everything for free; auto-sandboxing, live antivirus scanning, fully customisable firewall, HIPS, a rerouted DNS for extra security, their own security enhanced browser, and a few different cloud submission analysis services. For the price of free, it's a great bargain. I'd go with that to start, and see if it works for your uses. It's a bit of a pain to get running smoothly, at the beginning; but I think it's worth it.
Get whatever fits your budget, and makes you feel the most comfortable
Also, any security suite you get will slow your computer; the only difference between the them is how much you notice it. For me, Comodo doesn't really take up very many resources at "idle" (meaning with a few common applications running, like chrome/IM/etc., but with no browsing traffic being transmitted). In fact, here's how much memory it uses for me. Of course, it varies from computer to computer; however, unlike many antivirus programs I've used in the past, it is a lightweight background process.

Now, I haven't seen it slow down any programs, or games, yet, but it definitely could; just like all other security suites. The upside to Comodo is they include everything for free; auto-sandboxing, live antivirus scanning, fully customisable firewall, HIPS, a rerouted DNS for extra security, their own security enhanced browser, and a few different cloud submission analysis services. For the price of free, it's a great bargain. I'd go with that to start, and see if it works for your uses. It's a bit of a pain to get running smoothly, at the beginning; but I think it's worth it.
Get whatever fits your budget, and makes you feel the most comfortable
-
Reply to Skylyne
m
0
l
boryahjasper
September 21, 2014 11:38:39 AM
Bitdefender Internet Security is the best and lightest suite.
http://store.fileforum.com/p30580-bitdefender_internet_...
$19.95
http://chart.av-comparatives.org/chart1.php?chart=chart...
http://store.fileforum.com/p30580-bitdefender_internet_...
$19.95
http://chart.av-comparatives.org/chart1.php?chart=chart...
-
Reply to SR-71 Blackbird
m
0
l
Paul NZ
September 21, 2014 3:42:12 PM
Paul NZ
September 22, 2014 2:51:54 PM
No, I'm not kidding
If youre into torrents or dodgy sites maybe yer you need one. Havent had any of this rubbish on these things for 2-3 + yrs. And never been hit by anything. I just use Win8's default programs.
IMO all of these are just a con to get you to pay money for crap
Even if you buy one , it can still get disabled. So whats the point in getting it, if it doesnt do the job properly?
If youre into torrents or dodgy sites maybe yer you need one. Havent had any of this rubbish on these things for 2-3 + yrs. And never been hit by anything. I just use Win8's default programs.
IMO all of these are just a con to get you to pay money for crap
Even if you buy one , it can still get disabled. So whats the point in getting it, if it doesnt do the job properly?
-
Reply to Paul NZ
m
0
l
boryahjasper
September 22, 2014 4:16:51 PM
I hope you're kidding too.
Even harmless companies like Canadian Tire's Credit Card system are being hacked, what makes you think you can't be?
Some viruses/malwares/worms can be hidden in your computer without you even noticing, and since you don't even have an antivirus, how do you know that your computer is not infected?
I'm not sure what point you're trying to make, but it's not working and is totally incorrect.
Even harmless companies like Canadian Tire's Credit Card system are being hacked, what makes you think you can't be?
Some viruses/malwares/worms can be hidden in your computer without you even noticing, and since you don't even have an antivirus, how do you know that your computer is not infected?
I'm not sure what point you're trying to make, but it's not working and is totally incorrect.
-
Reply to boryahjasper
m
0
l
Paul NZ
September 22, 2014 6:35:08 PM
-
Reply to Paul NZ
m
0
l
Skylyne
September 22, 2014 10:44:23 PM
Paul NZ said:
No, I'm not kiddingIf youre into torrents or dodgy sites maybe yer you need one. Havent had any of this rubbish on these things for 2-3 + yrs. And never been hit by anything. I just use Win8's default programs.
IMO all of these are just a con to get you to pay money for crap
Even if you buy one , it can still get disabled. So whats the point in getting it, if it doesnt do the job properly?
This is fairly accurate... and let me expand upon why, before you guys start thinking that he's a bit nuts.
Realistically, viruses/etc. are deployed to infect users within the first few days of being released; once patches and a/v software can prevent an infection from hitting your computer, there's no point in relying on that virus to do its job. Now, on the user end, if there is a patch released for a virus that is on the loose, and the user has it installed to prevent infection/spreading/etc., why would the user need an anti-virus as well? It's like getting a vaccine against a minor germ that your body already is immune to. Even if it doesn't hurt you, it's pointless. If have data high traffic, or you continuously download files from untrusted sources (yes, friends/family count as untrusted sources), then your only real threat is when someone hands you an infected file that exploits something you didn't patch up to begin with.
Personally, I didn't run an anti-virus software for many years until recently. The reason I started? We had a complaint from our ISP that someone was using our IP address for "unapproved traffic" (ie: abuse of port 25). Well, this came VERY suspiciously soon after I had been tinkering with a friend's computer, which was having virus problems, and I figured that was where the problem stemmed. Sure enough, after running an a/v software (Comodo), I found a couple infections; and yes, after inspecting the files, everything was installed the day I was working on that computer; nothing malicious existed on my system from before that date. After that date, I had Comodo for a short while, but uninstalled it, as it did me nothing useful. That was the first time I ever had a genuine threat to my system, and I visit plenty of places that are known to host malware. I currently run it because of my currently increased amount of data traffic, but nothing has really happened. In reality, all it's done is restrict my I2P networking, and block various homebrew/freeware software from installing. It's a pain and a half.
The reality behind a/v software is this: if you don't keep your machine up-to-date, or if you aren't in tune with your computer very well, then it's a good thing to have. Software firewalls prevent you from certain threats that are not already taken care of in your OS, usually via a patch. While an a/v software can scan for active processes, the accuracy rate isn't as reliable as many people believe. There are countless back doors that are exploited by various software companies due to the NSA, or a legal obligation, and those back doors can't always be shut with an a/v software. In fact, it should be worth noting that a/v software only notices certain types of bugs; it mainly picks up on the processes that are viewable by the user, if you know what you're doing. The problem with this is there are plenty of malicious files/etc. that work silently, in the background, and do not have any real trace of what they are doing. These are the vulnerabilities that are mostly used by government agencies, like the NSA, but are also used by the much more advanced hackers that care to look for whatever vulnerabilities they can find. If the exploit isn't brought to public attention, is being used by the government, or the exploit is via a bug in the hardware/software barrier, then covering up exploits are something that's up in the air in many different ways.
A/v software is kind of a bitter-sweet thing; it's somewhat like the TSA, only they do have a substantial success rate. If you learn how to browse the web safely, how to criticise your files right, and you use the correct security measures when downloading/sharing, you're going to be ahead/on par with most a/v software. For my purposes, my a/v is there for checking files I want a second opinion on, and to act as a firewall; Ever since installing it, I've noticed more problems with speed/etc. than when I ran no security software. When I get my new rig built, I'll probably go back to no a/v software for this reason.
Also, boryahjasper, using examples of corporations that get hacked is a poor example. When those systems get hacked, it's usually something that has been overlooked by everyone, and exploited for a short time.
As I've said before, but maybe not on here, computer security is kind of an oxymoron in the grand scheme of things.
-
Reply to Skylyne
m
0
l
mdd1963
September 23, 2014 7:36:44 PM
boryahjasper
September 23, 2014 8:25:56 PM
Skylyne
September 24, 2014 11:48:10 AM
Mac is just as vulnerable, especially with uneducated users, and Linux is much less secure for the new Unix user. Unix systems in general are more secure, but they aren't as secure as most people think; even with proper security measures in place. In reality, a "safe" computer doesn't exist. All we can do is keep our computer clean of the known crap, and keep an eye out for fishy stuff happening on our systems. What many tend to forget is that the computer isn't always the weakest link in a chain. Receiving emails, a poorly "secured" network router, or using a flash drive on an infected computer will do more harm than most know. I'm wiling to bet there are more inventive ways to get an infected computer than to make a cocktail. Also, as a quick side note, SD cards can be hacked via their microcontroller; so stay away from the cheap/potentially fake SD cards. Just thought I'd throw that in there, since many people use them.
The reason why Mac isn't so different from Windows any more is because of their increasing popularity. Programmers/hackers focus on the most abundant systems; and since the Mac computers have been rapidly increasing in numbers over the past decade, or so, they have been focusing on writing viruses for the Mac OS. It's simple supply/demand theory, accept in the hacker world. The last time it was substantially safe to have a Mac? Probably within the first few years of the Apple/Mac frenzy; however, they're just as vulnerable now as they were in the original PowerPC days, and are pretty much as vulnerable as the Windows machines today. While there are certain steps taken to prevent infections, there are ways to get around user authentications. With Linux, and the substantial user base in the corporate world (namely servers), there are definitely weaknesses and vulnerabilities out there that can cause harm.
Pick the OS that serves you best, and just try to minimise risk with what you do. You can't avoid computer viruses entirely; even if nothing shows up on every a/v scanner. That's the reality. A/v software is just a comfort thing, unless it's being used on a computer that is not kept up to date 100%; including all drivers.
The reason why Mac isn't so different from Windows any more is because of their increasing popularity. Programmers/hackers focus on the most abundant systems; and since the Mac computers have been rapidly increasing in numbers over the past decade, or so, they have been focusing on writing viruses for the Mac OS. It's simple supply/demand theory, accept in the hacker world. The last time it was substantially safe to have a Mac? Probably within the first few years of the Apple/Mac frenzy; however, they're just as vulnerable now as they were in the original PowerPC days, and are pretty much as vulnerable as the Windows machines today. While there are certain steps taken to prevent infections, there are ways to get around user authentications. With Linux, and the substantial user base in the corporate world (namely servers), there are definitely weaknesses and vulnerabilities out there that can cause harm.
Pick the OS that serves you best, and just try to minimise risk with what you do. You can't avoid computer viruses entirely; even if nothing shows up on every a/v scanner. That's the reality. A/v software is just a comfort thing, unless it's being used on a computer that is not kept up to date 100%; including all drivers.
-
Reply to Skylyne
m
0
l
Brunostako
September 24, 2014 12:21:49 PM
I must agree with Paul NZ. It has been long since i used an antivirus suite and never have a problem, and if i ever have, it's easy to find a solution.
Those antivirus just sit there and do nothing but use resources.
I'm just careful with the e-mails i open, attachments downloads, web pages, etc. sounds like a tedious task, but i'm so used to it that i don't care.
Even with an antivirus you must be careful, the best antivirus can be overpassed, so it's about the same.
Those antivirus just sit there and do nothing but use resources.
I'm just careful with the e-mails i open, attachments downloads, web pages, etc. sounds like a tedious task, but i'm so used to it that i don't care.
Even with an antivirus you must be careful, the best antivirus can be overpassed, so it's about the same.
-
Reply to Brunostako
m
0
l
Skylyne
September 24, 2014 2:30:26 PM
^ To add to that, I'll also mention something interesting to many users: in all the years of running an a/v on my system, I've never had it actually stop a genuine threat. That doesn't mean that it won't work; it does mean that I don't subject myself to vulnerabilities in a way that I would need an a/v.
If you use specialised web browsers, utilise a lightweight firewall (Windows Firewall works fine for the most basic stuff), and you tune your browsing habits to be much more wary of what you click on, you shouldn't have a problem. When it comes to email attachments, I don't ever recommend opening them, unless you know the person is up-to-date with computer security. Personally, I don't use email beyond website registration, and the occasional file exchange (pictures or documents, mostly). I do not engage in casual emails, nor do I give out my email address freely; this results in less risk/exposure to emails from infected emails. Also, avoiding an email client can help with that.
There are plenty of ways to stay relatively safe without an a/v; they just take more initial effort, and require you to dedicate some time to keeping up on security measures. If you can't be bothered to do any of that, your pick of a/v software won't make too much of a difference, outside of how much it impacts your overall speed/etc..
If you use specialised web browsers, utilise a lightweight firewall (Windows Firewall works fine for the most basic stuff), and you tune your browsing habits to be much more wary of what you click on, you shouldn't have a problem. When it comes to email attachments, I don't ever recommend opening them, unless you know the person is up-to-date with computer security. Personally, I don't use email beyond website registration, and the occasional file exchange (pictures or documents, mostly). I do not engage in casual emails, nor do I give out my email address freely; this results in less risk/exposure to emails from infected emails. Also, avoiding an email client can help with that.
There are plenty of ways to stay relatively safe without an a/v; they just take more initial effort, and require you to dedicate some time to keeping up on security measures. If you can't be bothered to do any of that, your pick of a/v software won't make too much of a difference, outside of how much it impacts your overall speed/etc..
-
Reply to Skylyne
m
0
l
Have previously polled the moderators on this and historically, it tends to be a matter of personal preference.
On my end, I use Avast - though I'm pretty sure for me it comes down to brand loyalty since the usability features have decayed considerably in recent years. Of note, even if you don't mess with torrenting or the darker areas of the web, you still do very much need some kind of protection on your machine. Better to be safe than sorry.
-JP
On my end, I use Avast - though I'm pretty sure for me it comes down to brand loyalty since the usability features have decayed considerably in recent years. Of note, even if you don't mess with torrenting or the darker areas of the web, you still do very much need some kind of protection on your machine. Better to be safe than sorry.
-JP
-
Reply to jpishgar
m
0
l
Brunostako
September 25, 2014 9:31:04 AM
Personally, my brand loyalty is to Panda Antivirus.
That's the only antivirus I've really seen to work properly. I know is not one of the best in ranking, but this one is my choice. When i found something weird happening in my computer that i can't solve, i installed it, delete the virus or whatever it found, and uninstalled it. This have worked for me.
Actually, thanks to this post, i'm trying the Panda Cloud Antivirus Free. It certainly doesn't consume any resources and already passed some of my virus tests (some virus/trojan files i have).
That's the only antivirus I've really seen to work properly. I know is not one of the best in ranking, but this one is my choice. When i found something weird happening in my computer that i can't solve, i installed it, delete the virus or whatever it found, and uninstalled it. This have worked for me.
Actually, thanks to this post, i'm trying the Panda Cloud Antivirus Free. It certainly doesn't consume any resources and already passed some of my virus tests (some virus/trojan files i have).
-
Reply to Brunostako
m
0
l
Panda is top notch in the LAST COUPLE OF MONTHS.
http://chart.av-comparatives.org/chart1.php?chart=chart...
http://chart.av-comparatives.org/chart1.php?chart=chart...
-
Reply to SR-71 Blackbird
m
0
l
MeteorsRaining
September 25, 2014 10:29:10 AM
Agree with jpishgar, I use QuickHeal and never faced an issue, but on the other hand I had several viruses while using Avast and AVG. It's all about preference and what you do on your PC. Some Antiviruses tend to be better at blocking say Malware and some say Trojans or Rootkits. I'm aware of benefits of other antiviruses, but I'd still keep my opinion by suggestion QuickHeal.
-
Reply to MeteorsRaining
m
0
l
Brunostako
September 25, 2014 10:32:40 AM
boryahjasper
September 25, 2014 2:07:18 PM
-
Reply to boryahjasper
m
0
l
Brunostako
September 25, 2014 4:44:00 PM
boryahjasper
September 25, 2014 8:04:04 PM
Skylyne
September 25, 2014 9:44:55 PM
Well, you guys know my vote: Comodo. I have used Avast! in the past (and my folks currently run it), and I was far from impressed with it's "protection." Hey, to each their own; but I don't want to run my a/v scanner to find a virus that is months old, that it should have stopped from being installed on my computer to begin with. Avast! seemed to be more of a passive a/v software, with my experience, so (personally) I don't advocate the use of it. Panda has given me little/no problems in the short time frame I ran it (years ago). I would recommend it currently, as they have been holding their own in the a/v community ever since my introduction to them. Norton and McAfee have been on my radar over the years, and neither of them have impressed me. Hey, some people like those, and that's fine with me; I think they're crap. That's also personal opinion, though. With all the other software I've thoroughly investigated over the years, I've mostly seen purchase-required software to obtain the best features; and, in all honesty, these software companies are mostly trying to sell you their customer service (which I have no use for). Then again, I am a more advance user with this kind of thing.
On a personal level (and I hate to reiterate myself again), I still think a/v software is fairly pointless. I've been running my own computer, with an internet connection, for about 8 years, and I've been working with computers since I was a child (seriously, I grew up with a freaking Apple IIe), and I've only seen a/v software help users who fail to take the proper security measures on their own. I've not once seen it help a person who genuinely paid attention to their computer with astute detail; or a person who had a genuine understanding of their computer on a level that is commonly overlooked/misunderstood. Personally, I've had more problems with running a/v software than I've had without running one. I've not had any security suite actually stop a real threat, unless I failed to check the program myself before running it; and, even then, all of them were false positives. The list of problems I've had with security software is quite lengthy.
-JP
I will agree to disagree with this statement. I'm not trying to combat this, or twist your words, just going to give my two cents on what I took from this.
I've been torrenting for over a decade, and I've yet to have a genuine problem with any of my downloads; I've been using pseudo-TLD (top level domain) services off and on for a few years; and I also frequently use websites that have a history of using advertisers that host malware/etc., and have not once had a problem. For example, I once scanned my PC after two years of heavy torrenting, using numerous .onion and eepsite services/websites, and browsing some well known "risky" websites in general; after the full virus scan was complete on all used hard disks, I had nothing but two false positives (with about half a terabyte of information). How did I know they were false positives? Well, first I searched Google, and then I uploaded a copy to multiple on-line cloud-based virus scanners; the results pointed to false positives. Now, while my anecdotal evidence is definitely subject to criticism, I hope it is looked at from a neutral perspective. Why? I use plenty of other security measure that are not a/v software: I use security minded browsers (Aviator and Iron are great examples); I use AdGuard, as I've found it better than any AdBlock extension available; I regularly clean my computer's temp folder/registry/cookies/etc.; I do not let any web browsers save session information, unless I trust the website; I routinely clean up Windows services; I regularly check my RAM/CPU usage for anything out of place; I only download from file sharers/websites I trust; I check anything I find suspicious with an a/v service (usually cloud services)... the list goes on. This is also bred into my daily routine, so I don't really have to think about it. It has gotten to the point where any a/v software I install has to be pruned back on its duties to the point that it's barely allowed to do anything; so it sits there consuming resources, and barely does its job.
If you are security minded from the get-go, you do not need security software. If you have plenty of resources to spare, it's worth having; but if you don't, or it slows down your daily use significantly, and you're highly security minded to begin with, it's going to get in the way more than help you. Also, for those advanced enough to understand their way around a/v software, and know how to tweak their OS for extra security and performance, a/v software becomes a hassle, due to its constant permission requests, and auto-blocking. I've had plenty of legitimate software unable to install because auto-sandboxing preventing essential files from being installed... and no, I'm not talking about shady software.
I'm sure I've said more than enough on this, but I just can't help thinking that a/v software is given too good of a reputation on here without substantial reasons supporting it. The whole "better safe than sorry" argument doesn't really hold up when you start diving much deeper into security measures, and you start getting more involved. It reminds me of when I was trying to get a suitable GPU, and everyone kept using the old myth of "more is better." Well, just like purchasing hardware, picking a security software seems to be something that is based on benchmarks for only a certain niche of users; and that kind of bothers me. Meh... I guess this is just me ranting haha. Carry on fellas!
On a personal level (and I hate to reiterate myself again), I still think a/v software is fairly pointless. I've been running my own computer, with an internet connection, for about 8 years, and I've been working with computers since I was a child (seriously, I grew up with a freaking Apple IIe), and I've only seen a/v software help users who fail to take the proper security measures on their own. I've not once seen it help a person who genuinely paid attention to their computer with astute detail; or a person who had a genuine understanding of their computer on a level that is commonly overlooked/misunderstood. Personally, I've had more problems with running a/v software than I've had without running one. I've not had any security suite actually stop a real threat, unless I failed to check the program myself before running it; and, even then, all of them were false positives. The list of problems I've had with security software is quite lengthy.
jpishgar said:
Of note, even if you don't mess with torrenting or the darker areas of the web, you still do very much need some kind of protection on your machine. Better to be safe than sorry.-JP
I will agree to disagree with this statement. I'm not trying to combat this, or twist your words, just going to give my two cents on what I took from this.
I've been torrenting for over a decade, and I've yet to have a genuine problem with any of my downloads; I've been using pseudo-TLD (top level domain) services off and on for a few years; and I also frequently use websites that have a history of using advertisers that host malware/etc., and have not once had a problem. For example, I once scanned my PC after two years of heavy torrenting, using numerous .onion and eepsite services/websites, and browsing some well known "risky" websites in general; after the full virus scan was complete on all used hard disks, I had nothing but two false positives (with about half a terabyte of information). How did I know they were false positives? Well, first I searched Google, and then I uploaded a copy to multiple on-line cloud-based virus scanners; the results pointed to false positives. Now, while my anecdotal evidence is definitely subject to criticism, I hope it is looked at from a neutral perspective. Why? I use plenty of other security measure that are not a/v software: I use security minded browsers (Aviator and Iron are great examples); I use AdGuard, as I've found it better than any AdBlock extension available; I regularly clean my computer's temp folder/registry/cookies/etc.; I do not let any web browsers save session information, unless I trust the website; I routinely clean up Windows services; I regularly check my RAM/CPU usage for anything out of place; I only download from file sharers/websites I trust; I check anything I find suspicious with an a/v service (usually cloud services)... the list goes on. This is also bred into my daily routine, so I don't really have to think about it. It has gotten to the point where any a/v software I install has to be pruned back on its duties to the point that it's barely allowed to do anything; so it sits there consuming resources, and barely does its job.
If you are security minded from the get-go, you do not need security software. If you have plenty of resources to spare, it's worth having; but if you don't, or it slows down your daily use significantly, and you're highly security minded to begin with, it's going to get in the way more than help you. Also, for those advanced enough to understand their way around a/v software, and know how to tweak their OS for extra security and performance, a/v software becomes a hassle, due to its constant permission requests, and auto-blocking. I've had plenty of legitimate software unable to install because auto-sandboxing preventing essential files from being installed... and no, I'm not talking about shady software.
I'm sure I've said more than enough on this, but I just can't help thinking that a/v software is given too good of a reputation on here without substantial reasons supporting it. The whole "better safe than sorry" argument doesn't really hold up when you start diving much deeper into security measures, and you start getting more involved. It reminds me of when I was trying to get a suitable GPU, and everyone kept using the old myth of "more is better." Well, just like purchasing hardware, picking a security software seems to be something that is based on benchmarks for only a certain niche of users; and that kind of bothers me. Meh... I guess this is just me ranting haha. Carry on fellas!
-
Reply to Skylyne
m
0
l
Brunostako
September 26, 2014 11:53:35 AM
Skylyne
September 26, 2014 5:17:08 PM
Minor note to those interested: after removing my last security software (Comodo), I have seen substantial improvements in performance. Because of the way it was sandboxing a lot of applications, the large amount of active network monitoring, and so on, it was causing my CPU to bottleneck in various ways. Now, I am currently on old hardware, but it should be noted that the security suite, on its own, does not consume very much resources at idle (I posted a picture earlier on showing it). I also did not run the live virus scanner at all while, which means my speeds would likely have been much slower with it running. It was, however, running when I took the screenshot posted earlier; just to clear that up.
It's quite surprising how much a lightweight security program can bog your system down when you start putting it under load. I think that gets overlooked all too easily. Hey, that's just my two cents.
It's quite surprising how much a lightweight security program can bog your system down when you start putting it under load. I think that gets overlooked all too easily. Hey, that's just my two cents.
-
Reply to Skylyne
m
0
l
peterracine
October 1, 2014 4:51:30 PM
Rangan Das said:
So, the 2015 versions of the security suites are being released and I am badly in need of one for my desktop. I have tons of projects, college work and documents that I just cannot afford to lose.I was using Malwarebytes Anti-Malware that I purchased long back. I upgraded, but it was not worth it. Even, Windows Defender on my Windows 8.1 Enterprise Ed detected a malware that Malwarebytes completely skipped. I had to get rid of it using Bitdefender's 60 second scanner. Windows is also kept updated.
My activities include a lot of work involving Adobe Photoshop, Lightroom and Illustrator. Then, there is Visual Studio, JDK, Hyper-V and more. Most of them take up a lot of resources (I mostly run Visual Studio and Illustrator in parallel). So, I need an Anti-Virus, or maybe a security solution (yes, I do most of my shopping online).
Until now, I have never needed an AV as Windows Defender and Malwarebytes used to do a good job. However, my system got attacked by a FakeChrome Trojan (I do not even use Chrome, mostly Firefox and IE11) and now, I feel the need to get a good AV that will not slow down my system.
So, I need a suggestion. In terms of budget, I can spend upto 5,000INR or maybe, I can go a bit more. But, I must be sure that my system is totally protected. I can also spend a bit more given that it gives me peace of mind!
P.S. I have used Bitdefender Windows 8 security for a while (180 days) that I got free of cost when I purchased the Windows 8 Enterprise Edition from the store. It has expired now. Should I/Can I renew that?
Also, I play games, the newest titles, but not an avid gamer.
Config:
Windows 8.1 Enterprise Ed. (up-to-date with Update 1)
AMD FX-8320 8-core @ 4.0 GHz with CM Hyper TX-3 Cooler
AMD Radeon HD 7850 2GB DDR5
2x Kingston 4GB DDR3 RAM
HDD: 256GB + 2TB + 1TB ext.
-
Reply to peterracine
m
0
l
peterracine
October 1, 2014 4:56:45 PM
I do not pay for antivirus and I have malwarebytes and superantispyware installed on my machines in case of a bad infection. I would also like to add that if for some reason these great antimalware programs could not help you, I have had a lot of success with difficult malware infections using adwcleaner. It is not well known but, I am surprised at how fast it works and it also finds the difficult malware I cant get rid of manually.
-
Reply to peterracine
m
0
l
Related resources
- Solvedcan any one suggest me a good entry level graphic card...need help Forum
- Solvedplz suggest me if my rig is not good in any part.. am about to order so need help Forum
- SolvedI need to buy a laptop for heavy video editing please suggest me some laptops and even let me know better graphics video cards Forum
- I Need a good 2gb graphics card for intel D945GCNL motherboard...........please suggest me soon? Forum
- SolvedI need a overclocking guide on a MSI Z87 GD65 can any suggest to me? Forum
- How much power supply is needed for this configuration? Also suggest me a PSU Forum
- [Need Help] Suggest Best Laptop for me Forum
- Urgently need suggestions in choosing a lappi for my vlsi firm Forum
- SolvedNeed a Graphic Card which suites me best. Forum
- SolvedI need a gaming pc build that would suit me the best (And is also good for future games) Forum
- SolvedSuggest me an ultimate surround system for all my needs? Forum
- Need help choosing a cpu to suit me Forum
- SolvedNeed Suggestion For Cpu Coolers "Urgent" Forum
- Please help me figure out which one would suit my needs. Forum
- Can you help me pick out a printer that suits my mom's needs? Forum
- More resources
!