Intel XEON x3323 6mb cach VS HP XEON x3323 16mb cach

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
S

shafe88

Distinguished
Jul 6, 2010
854
1
19,015
Whats the difference between a regular XEON x3323 and an HP XEON x3323. I saw an HP XEON x3323 on amazon for $10, and thought that it meant it came from an HP system, till I noticed in the description that it has 16mb of cach. I have an optiplex 755, and saw that you can use a XEON x3323 provided you use a lga771 to lga775 adapter.
http://www.amazon.com/469657-001-Processors-Intel-Quad-core-2-5ghz/dp/B004OZT88W/ref=sr_1_2?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1405881116&sr=1-2&keywords=xeon+x3323&dpPl=1
 
Solution
zeyuanfu

The one with 16 MB cache is significantly better.
Sort by date Sort by votes
zeyuanfu

zeyuanfu

Splendid
Jun 19, 2014
4,919
0
24,960

The one with 16 MB cache is significantly better.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Solution
S

shafe88

Distinguished
Jul 6, 2010
854
1
19,015

I'm not too worried about the cach, i'm worried about it not being the same as a regular X3323 and not working in my 755.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
C

Caramac

Distinguished
Oct 10, 2011
27
0
18,540
Mega Micro Devices Inc. sells this, but no way does this have 16MB of L2 Cache; that must be a misprint on Amazon.
A simple solution is the 12MB L2 Cache LGA775 Xeon X3350 for $30 or so.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts

Moderators online

Share this page

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom