Is there any place to get the graphical benchmarks of Intel processor internal graphic part only?

in66732

Distinguished
Sep 4, 2011
49
0
18,530
Hello I've been shopping for use notebook on eBay and my major concern has been the graphical capabilities of these notebooks. I'm looking for one which will let you externally Attach your computer monitor or television and display videos the parameters of which I will post below in all this splendor. There are old laptops available which have Nvidia processor modules for graphics and once which only use internal processor graphics. What I am trying to figure out is if a third-generation I5 internal processor graphic laptop only can be as good as a first-generation I5 laptop with a Nvidia processor module.

I also I'm trying to figure out if either could be as good or better than my present desktop setup which is dual core Intel processor E5200 running at 2500 Hz with the video card NVIDIA GT 520 . I can find benchmarks for my E5200 processor and my NVIDIA GT 520 card, but does far cannot judge how these benchmarks will compare with the benchmarks of the laptops am looking for because I do not have an available source of benchmarks for the graphical portion of processor included graphics.

Two examples of video I am trying to render as good as my present desktop setup are below.


example 1
General
Complete name : E:\RecordedTV library-ms march 2013\Great American Songbook_KRMADT_2013_12_04_20_28_00.wtv
Format : MPEG Video
Format version : Version 2
File size : 8.42 GiB
Overall bit rate mode : Variable
Law rating : TV-G

Video
Format : MPEG Video
Format version : Version 2
Format profile : Main@High
Format settings, BVOP : Yes
Format settings, Matrix : Custom
Format settings, GOP : M=3, N=15
Bit rate mode : Variable
Maximum bit rate : 19.4 Mbps
Width : 1 920 pixels
Height : 1 080 pixels
Display aspect ratio : 16:9
Frame rate : 29.970 fps
Standard : Component
Color space : YUV
Chroma subsampling : 4:2:0
Bit depth : 8 bits
Scan type : Interlaced
Scan order : Top Field First
Compression mode : Lossy
Time code of first frame : 22:09:21;08
Color primaries : BT.709
Transfer characteristics : BT.709
Matrix coefficients : BT.709

Text #1
ID : CC1
Format : EIA-608
Muxing mode : A/53 / DTVCC Transport
Bit rate mode : Constant
Stream size : 0.00 Byte (0%)

Text #2
ID : 1
Format : EIA-708
Muxing mode : A/53 / DTVCC Transport
Bit rate mode : Constant
Stream size : 0.00 Byte (0%)

Text #3
ID : 2
Format : EIA-708
Muxing mode : A/53 / DTVCC Transport
Bit rate mode : Constant
Stream size : 0.00 Byte (0%)






example 2
General
Unique ID : 171638323177649616999949573673292933021 (0x812056AFE16EBCD9BBBB2D1FC5EC279D)
Complete name : C:\Users\marc\Desktop\music overflow & TV raw\BBC Hooray for Hollywood Proms 2011 - Prom 59 [HDTV 720p].mkv
Format : Matroska
Format version : Version 2
File size : 3.23 GiB
Duration : 1h 58mn
Overall bit rate : 3 886 Kbps
Encoded date : UTC 2011-09-04 06:57:29
Writing application : mkvmerge v4.0.0 ('The Stars were mine') built on Jun 6 2010 16:18:42
Writing library : libebml v1.0.0 + libmatroska v1.0.0

Video
ID : 1
Format : AVC
Format/Info : Advanced Video Codec
Format profile : High@L4.1
Format settings, CABAC : Yes
Format settings, ReFrames : 4 frames
Codec ID : V_MPEG4/ISO/AVC
Duration : 1h 58mn
Bit rate : 3 500 Kbps
Width : 1 280 pixels
Height : 720 pixels
Display aspect ratio : 16:9
Frame rate mode : Constant
Frame rate : 25.000 fps
Color space : YUV
Chroma subsampling : 4:2:0
Bit depth : 8 bits
Scan type : Progressive
Bits/(Pixel*Frame) : 0.152
Stream size : 2.84 GiB (88%)
Writing library : x264 core 116 r2019 9cc407d
Encoding settings : cabac=1 / ref=5 / deblock=1:0:0 / analyse=0x3:0x113 / me=umh / subme=8 / psy=1 / psy_rd=1.00:0.00 / mixed_ref=1 / me_range=16 / chroma_me=1 / trellis=1 / 8x8dct=1 / cqm=0 / deadzone=21,11 / fast_pskip=0 / chroma_qp_offset=-2 / threads=6 / sliced_threads=0 / nr=0 / decimate=1 / interlaced=0 / bluray_compat=0 / constrained_intra=0 / bframes=3 / b_pyramid=1 / b_adapt=2 / b_bias=0 / direct=3 / weightb=1 / open_gop=0 / weightp=2 / keyint=250 / keyint_min=25 / scenecut=40 / intra_refresh=0 / rc_lookahead=50 / rc=2pass / mbtree=1 / bitrate=3500 / ratetol=1.0 / qcomp=0.60 / qpmin=0 / qpmax=69 / qpstep=4 / cplxblur=20.0 / qblur=0.5 / vbv_maxrate=40000 / vbv_bufsize=30000 / nal_hrd=none / ip_ratio=1.40 / aq=1:1.00
Language : English
Default : No
Forced : No

Audio
ID : 2
Format : AC-3
Format/Info : Audio Coding 3
Mode extension : CM (complete main)
Format settings, Endianness : Big
Codec ID : A_AC3
Duration : 1h 58mn
Bit rate mode : Constant
Bit rate : 384 Kbps
Channel(s) : 6 channels
Channel positions : Front: L C R, Side: L R, LFE
Sampling rate : 48.0 KHz
Bit depth : 16 bits
Compression mode : Lossy
Delay relative to video : 30ms
Stream size : 327 MiB (10%)
Language : English
Default : Yes
Forced : No

 
There are lots of benchmarks available online like the one linked below. If they don't show a particular aspect that you're looking for, you can probably extrapolate from the data they do show. For how the different IGPs perform based on chip/IGP combination, you'll probably have to look up each chip individually, then you can populate your own comparison chart.

http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/haswells-hd-4600-graphics-tested/#!bp1VjD
 
Solution