amd fx-8350 vs i5 4690k with a gtx 780 3gb
Tags:
- Gtx
-
AMD
- Intel i5
-
CPUs
Last response: in CPUs
Arsenalfan
July 29, 2014 5:40:39 AM
Definitely the i5-4690K is better. You will have the chance of overclocking it and the graphics card is great. By any chance, could you upgrade to a Ti? It will perform better.
http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-4690K-vs-AMD-FX-8350
http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-4690K-vs-AMD-FX-8350
-
Reply to Joeteoh99
m
0
l
Arsenalfan
July 29, 2014 5:50:13 AM
Joeteoh99 said:
Definitely the i5-4690K is better. You will have the chance of overclocking it and the graphics card is great. By any chance, could you upgrade to a Ti? It will perform better. http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-4690K-vs-AMD-FX-8350
What's the difference between the two?
-
Reply to Arsenalfan
m
0
l
Related resources
- I5 4690k vs AMD FX8350 - Forum
- AMD FX-8350 vs AMD A10 7850k vs i5 4690k - Forum
- i5 4690k gtx770 vs i7 4790 gtx780? - Forum
- i7 4770k + GTX 770 4GB vs i5 4670k + GTX 780 3GB - Forum
- i5 4460 gtx 780 or i5 4690k gtx 770 for gaming - Forum
Arsenalfan said:
Joeteoh99 said:
Definitely the i5-4690K is better. You will have the chance of overclocking it and the graphics card is great. By any chance, could you upgrade to a Ti? It will perform better. http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-4690K-vs-AMD-FX-8350
What's the difference between the two?
Intel are generally better and more reliable, but it is more expensive than an AMD. Both are still able to overclock. However, the AMD has a base frequency of 4GHz which doesn't need to be overclocked because no games will need that much anyway.
-
Reply to Joeteoh99
m
0
l
Arsenalfan said:
Joeteoh99 said:
Definitely the i5-4690K is better. You will have the chance of overclocking it and the graphics card is great. By any chance, could you upgrade to a Ti? It will perform better. http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-4690K-vs-AMD-FX-8350
What's the difference between the two?
The 4690k will be much more consistent where the 8350 performs well in a few games and poorly in many games. The difference in performance is about what you would expect from their difference in price in most cases though.
-
Reply to Traciatim
m
0
l
Traciatim said:
Arsenalfan said:
Joeteoh99 said:
Definitely the i5-4690K is better. You will have the chance of overclocking it and the graphics card is great. By any chance, could you upgrade to a Ti? It will perform better. http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-4690K-vs-AMD-FX-8350
What's the difference between the two?
The 4690k will be much more consistent where the 8350 performs well in a few games and poorly in many games. The difference in performance is about what you would expect from their difference in price in most cases though.
Yes, you are absolutely right. The i5 processors are praise for its excellency in gaming. So all the best to pick your processor.
I hope I have helped you out.
-
Reply to Joeteoh99
m
0
l
Yuna
July 29, 2014 5:58:45 AM
I would have to choose the i5 4690k, AMD build good cpu (if they are bad low quality they shouldn't work at all use some common sence cramming and making sure billions of transistor working in a petit die and if they slack off they entire wafer is toast. They just have a weaker architecture) Intel still win in terms of performance and efficiency, if you game on one gpu you will not be able to tell the difference between the two. But if you plan on pairing two GTX 780, Intel's cpu would be NOTICEABLY quicker. And since Intel fixed the i5 4690k with soldered TIM you could not achieve 5ghz on air but your temps would be lower. Yes both could overclock but Intel runs cooler and efficiently. Great future build though.
-
Reply to Yuna
m
0
l
Best solution
I'd pick the i5 any day.
Don't be fooled by the AMD's eight cores; they're actually pretty weak on an individual basis and very little software will utilise them all. The AM3+ socket has been around for a long time and I wouldn't expect any more processors to be developed for it. AMD seem to be concentrating more on their APU line, which uses the FM2 socket.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not a fanboy, but AMD haven't released anything new for nearly a year and they simply can't match Intel for raw performance. They can compete at the lower end of the processor scale, but once you get into i5 territory, there's little reason to consider AMD quite honestly.
Don't be fooled by the AMD's eight cores; they're actually pretty weak on an individual basis and very little software will utilise them all. The AM3+ socket has been around for a long time and I wouldn't expect any more processors to be developed for it. AMD seem to be concentrating more on their APU line, which uses the FM2 socket.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not a fanboy, but AMD haven't released anything new for nearly a year and they simply can't match Intel for raw performance. They can compete at the lower end of the processor scale, but once you get into i5 territory, there's little reason to consider AMD quite honestly.
-
Reply to bicycle_repair_man
Share
Arsenalfan
July 29, 2014 6:02:50 AM
Joeteoh99 said:
Arsenalfan said:
Joeteoh99 said:
Definitely the i5-4690K is better. You will have the chance of overclocking it and the graphics card is great. By any chance, could you upgrade to a Ti? It will perform better. http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-4690K-vs-AMD-FX-8350
What's the difference between the two?
Intel are generally better and more reliable, but it is more expensive than an AMD. Both are still able to overclock. However, the AMD has a base frequency of 4GHz which doesn't need to be overclocked because no games will need that much anyway.
Traciatim said:
Arsenalfan said:
Joeteoh99 said:
Definitely the i5-4690K is better. You will have the chance of overclocking it and the graphics card is great. By any chance, could you upgrade to a Ti? It will perform better. http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-4690K-vs-AMD-FX-8350
What's the difference between the two?
The 4690k will be much more consistent where the 8350 performs well in a few games and poorly in many games. The difference in performance is about what you would expect from their difference in price in most cases though.
Joeteoh99 said:
Traciatim said:
Arsenalfan said:
Joeteoh99 said:
Definitely the i5-4690K is better. You will have the chance of overclocking it and the graphics card is great. By any chance, could you upgrade to a Ti? It will perform better. http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-4690K-vs-AMD-FX-8350
What's the difference between the two?
The 4690k will be much more consistent where the 8350 performs well in a few games and poorly in many games. The difference in performance is about what you would expect from their difference in price in most cases though.
Yes, you are absolutely right. The i5 processors are praise for its excellency in gaming. So all the best to pick your processor.
I hope I have helped you out.
Yuna said:
I would have to choose the i5 4690k, AMD build good cpu (if they are bad low quality they shouldn't work at all use some common sence cramming and making sure billions of transistor working in a petit die and if they slack off they entire wafer is toast. They just have a weaker architecture) Intel still win in terms of performance and efficiency, if you game on one gpu you will not be able to tell the difference between the two. But if you plan on pairing two GTX 780, Intel's cpu would be NOTICEABLY quicker. And since Intel fixed the i5 4690k with soldered TIM you could not achieve 5ghz on air but your temps would be lower. Yes both could overclock but Intel runs cooler and efficiently. Great future build though.
The i5 4690k sounds good, is it the best i5 to match with a gtx 780?
-
Reply to Arsenalfan
m
0
l
Arsenalfan
July 29, 2014 6:04:30 AM
Joeteoh99 said:
Traciatim said:
Arsenalfan said:
Joeteoh99 said:
Definitely the i5-4690K is better. You will have the chance of overclocking it and the graphics card is great. By any chance, could you upgrade to a Ti? It will perform better. http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-4690K-vs-AMD-FX-8350
What's the difference between the two?
The 4690k will be much more consistent where the 8350 performs well in a few games and poorly in many games. The difference in performance is about what you would expect from their difference in price in most cases though.
Yes, you are absolutely right. The i5 processors are praise for its excellency in gaming. So all the best to pick your processor.
I hope I have helped you out.
You have thanks for the reply
-
Reply to Arsenalfan
m
0
l
Arsenalfan said:
Joeteoh99 said:
Arsenalfan said:
Joeteoh99 said:
Definitely the i5-4690K is better. You will have the chance of overclocking it and the graphics card is great. By any chance, could you upgrade to a Ti? It will perform better. http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-4690K-vs-AMD-FX-8350
What's the difference between the two?
Intel are generally better and more reliable, but it is more expensive than an AMD. Both are still able to overclock. However, the AMD has a base frequency of 4GHz which doesn't need to be overclocked because no games will need that much anyway.
Traciatim said:
Arsenalfan said:
Joeteoh99 said:
Definitely the i5-4690K is better. You will have the chance of overclocking it and the graphics card is great. By any chance, could you upgrade to a Ti? It will perform better. http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-4690K-vs-AMD-FX-8350
What's the difference between the two?
The 4690k will be much more consistent where the 8350 performs well in a few games and poorly in many games. The difference in performance is about what you would expect from their difference in price in most cases though.
Joeteoh99 said:
Traciatim said:
Arsenalfan said:
Joeteoh99 said:
Definitely the i5-4690K is better. You will have the chance of overclocking it and the graphics card is great. By any chance, could you upgrade to a Ti? It will perform better. http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-4690K-vs-AMD-FX-8350
What's the difference between the two?
The 4690k will be much more consistent where the 8350 performs well in a few games and poorly in many games. The difference in performance is about what you would expect from their difference in price in most cases though.
Yes, you are absolutely right. The i5 processors are praise for its excellency in gaming. So all the best to pick your processor.
I hope I have helped you out.
Yuna said:
I would have to choose the i5 4690k, AMD build good cpu (if they are bad low quality they shouldn't work at all use some common sence cramming and making sure billions of transistor working in a petit die and if they slack off they entire wafer is toast. They just have a weaker architecture) Intel still win in terms of performance and efficiency, if you game on one gpu you will not be able to tell the difference between the two. But if you plan on pairing two GTX 780, Intel's cpu would be NOTICEABLY quicker. And since Intel fixed the i5 4690k with soldered TIM you could not achieve 5ghz on air but your temps would be lower. Yes both could overclock but Intel runs cooler and efficiently. Great future build though.
The i5 4690k sounds good, is it the best i5 to match with a gtx 780?
It is definitely a wise and sensible choice. If this answer has solve your question, don't mind clicking on "Pick Solution" so others who experienced having trouble choosing a processor may be benefited.
Cheers mate
-
Reply to Joeteoh99
m
0
l
Arsenalfan
July 29, 2014 6:12:23 AM
Joeteoh99 said:
Arsenalfan said:
Joeteoh99 said:
Arsenalfan said:
Joeteoh99 said:
Definitely the i5-4690K is better. You will have the chance of overclocking it and the graphics card is great. By any chance, could you upgrade to a Ti? It will perform better. http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-4690K-vs-AMD-FX-8350
What's the difference between the two?
Intel are generally better and more reliable, but it is more expensive than an AMD. Both are still able to overclock. However, the AMD has a base frequency of 4GHz which doesn't need to be overclocked because no games will need that much anyway.
Traciatim said:
Arsenalfan said:
Joeteoh99 said:
Definitely the i5-4690K is better. You will have the chance of overclocking it and the graphics card is great. By any chance, could you upgrade to a Ti? It will perform better. http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-4690K-vs-AMD-FX-8350
What's the difference between the two?
The 4690k will be much more consistent where the 8350 performs well in a few games and poorly in many games. The difference in performance is about what you would expect from their difference in price in most cases though.
Joeteoh99 said:
Traciatim said:
Arsenalfan said:
Joeteoh99 said:
Definitely the i5-4690K is better. You will have the chance of overclocking it and the graphics card is great. By any chance, could you upgrade to a Ti? It will perform better. http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-4690K-vs-AMD-FX-8350
What's the difference between the two?
The 4690k will be much more consistent where the 8350 performs well in a few games and poorly in many games. The difference in performance is about what you would expect from their difference in price in most cases though.
Yes, you are absolutely right. The i5 processors are praise for its excellency in gaming. So all the best to pick your processor.
I hope I have helped you out.
Yuna said:
I would have to choose the i5 4690k, AMD build good cpu (if they are bad low quality they shouldn't work at all use some common sence cramming and making sure billions of transistor working in a petit die and if they slack off they entire wafer is toast. They just have a weaker architecture) Intel still win in terms of performance and efficiency, if you game on one gpu you will not be able to tell the difference between the two. But if you plan on pairing two GTX 780, Intel's cpu would be NOTICEABLY quicker. And since Intel fixed the i5 4690k with soldered TIM you could not achieve 5ghz on air but your temps would be lower. Yes both could overclock but Intel runs cooler and efficiently. Great future build though.
The i5 4690k sounds good, is it the best i5 to match with a gtx 780?
It is definitely a wise and sensible choice. If this answer has solve your question, don't mind clicking on "Pick Solution" so others who experienced having trouble choosing a processor may be benefited.
Cheers mate
Oops sorry about that would a gtx 780 3gb be considered over kill if I could a 770 4gb?
-
Reply to Arsenalfan
m
0
l
Related resources
- SolvedGTX 770 + I7 4790k or GTX 780 I5 4690k Forum
- Solvedi5 4690k and gtx 780 Forum
- SolvedGtx 780 3GB OC Gigabyte Vs AMD R9 290X 4GB Forum
- Solvedamd 8350 vs intel i5 4690k Forum
- will a i5 4690k @ 4.2 bottleneck a gtx 780? Forum
- can a zotac gtx 780ti amp! and i5 4690k run crysis 3 max 1080p w/ >25 fps? Forum
- SolvedAmd fx 8350 vs Intel i5 4690k for 3d rendering. Forum
- Fx 6350 and GTX 780 or i5 4690k and GTX 770 Forum
- SolvedAMD FX-8350 + R7 260X vs Intel i5 4670k + GTX 660 Forum
- Need PSU help for my first build! GTX 780 ti with i5 4690k Oculus Rift build. Please help. Forum
- i5 4690k vs i7 4790k/ gtx 770 poseidon vs striker 760 Forum
- Amd FX 8350 vs i5 4690k (Poll) (Can Decide) Forum
- SolvedGIGABYTE GV-N680OC-2GD GeForce GTX 680 2GB vs. EVGA GeForce GTX780 SuperClocked w/EVGA ACX Cooler 3GB Forum
- SolvedMSI RADEON R9 290X GAMING 4G vs EVGA GEFORCE GTX780 ACX DUAL CLASSIFIED 3GB Forum
- SolvedEVGA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 3GB Superclocked ACX 2 Wat-SLI vs EVGA GeForce GTX 770 2GB Superclocked ACX 3 Way SLI? What woud be be Forum
- More resources
!