Hello All,
I am a little confused about something and I was hoping to get some explanation/clarification from someone on the forums.
Up to about a few hours ago I connect to the internet from my PC the following way:
My PC <-> PCI WiFi Adapter (802.11N) <-> Wireless Router <-> Cable Modem
WiFi Adapter: TP-LINK TL-WN881ND / 802.11N / Speeds up to 300Mbps
Wireless Router: Netgear WNDR3700 / 802.11N / WiFi Speed 300+300 - Up To 600 Mbps
Cable Modem: Motorola Sufboard SB6121 / DOCSIS 3.0 / Speeds Up To 160 Mbps
I just got back from Best Buy and Fry's Electronics where I purchased the following new hardware:
WiFi Adapter: Asus PCE-AC68 / 802.11AC / Speeds Up To 1.3 Gps
Wireless Router: Linksys EA6350 AC1200+ / 802.11AC (draft) / Dual Bands N300 Mbps + AC867 Mbps
The first thing I did when I got home was installed the new WiFi adapter (but kept the old Wireless Router).
I then ran a speed test. Here are the results I got:
31.20 Mbs Download / 5.69 Mbs Upload / 16 Ms ping
I then replaced the Wireless Router with the new Linksys 802.11AC and connected to the 5GHz channel and ran the speed test with the following results:
32.64 Mbs Download / 6.74 Mbs Upload / 10 Ms ping
I connected the the 2.4 GHz channel and again ran the speed test:
32.58 Mbs Download / 6.84 Mbs Upload / 10 Ms ping
As you can see, the results using the old 802.11N router and with this new setup are nearly identical.
Could it be my cable modem that is the limiting factor meaning that all this new and better WiFi stuff won't make a difference? Should I consider getting a faster cable modem?
Also, the guy at Best Buy was telling me that Cox (my cable internet provider) averages around 50 Mbs for the average home consumer.
If that's the case, what is the point of all this new/better 802.11AC hardware for the average consumer if the bandwidth will be limited by the cable provider to values very much lower that specified for 802.11AC?
Thank you,
Jan
I am a little confused about something and I was hoping to get some explanation/clarification from someone on the forums.
Up to about a few hours ago I connect to the internet from my PC the following way:
My PC <-> PCI WiFi Adapter (802.11N) <-> Wireless Router <-> Cable Modem
WiFi Adapter: TP-LINK TL-WN881ND / 802.11N / Speeds up to 300Mbps
Wireless Router: Netgear WNDR3700 / 802.11N / WiFi Speed 300+300 - Up To 600 Mbps
Cable Modem: Motorola Sufboard SB6121 / DOCSIS 3.0 / Speeds Up To 160 Mbps
I just got back from Best Buy and Fry's Electronics where I purchased the following new hardware:
WiFi Adapter: Asus PCE-AC68 / 802.11AC / Speeds Up To 1.3 Gps
Wireless Router: Linksys EA6350 AC1200+ / 802.11AC (draft) / Dual Bands N300 Mbps + AC867 Mbps
The first thing I did when I got home was installed the new WiFi adapter (but kept the old Wireless Router).
I then ran a speed test. Here are the results I got:
31.20 Mbs Download / 5.69 Mbs Upload / 16 Ms ping
I then replaced the Wireless Router with the new Linksys 802.11AC and connected to the 5GHz channel and ran the speed test with the following results:
32.64 Mbs Download / 6.74 Mbs Upload / 10 Ms ping
I connected the the 2.4 GHz channel and again ran the speed test:
32.58 Mbs Download / 6.84 Mbs Upload / 10 Ms ping
As you can see, the results using the old 802.11N router and with this new setup are nearly identical.
Could it be my cable modem that is the limiting factor meaning that all this new and better WiFi stuff won't make a difference? Should I consider getting a faster cable modem?
Also, the guy at Best Buy was telling me that Cox (my cable internet provider) averages around 50 Mbs for the average home consumer.
If that's the case, what is the point of all this new/better 802.11AC hardware for the average consumer if the bandwidth will be limited by the cable provider to values very much lower that specified for 802.11AC?
Thank you,
Jan