Sign-in / Sign-up
Your question
Solved

fx 4350 and two-way SLI gtx 760

Tags:
  • CPUs
  • SLI
  • Components
  • Gtx
  • GPUs
  • Bottleneck
Last response: in Components
August 4, 2014 6:10:13 PM

whould cpu or gpu bottleneck on either of each other?

More about : 4350 sli gtx 760

August 4, 2014 6:16:47 PM

you are the boss here, blackbird. then tell me and don't fool around!
m
0
l
Related resources
a c 2618 à CPUs
August 4, 2014 6:17:48 PM

I just try to help . I love to help others with tech. :D 
m
0
l
August 4, 2014 6:19:28 PM

aslo do i, i am a pc expert but havent found any benchmarks for that specific cpu! and wich one will bottleneck?
m
0
l
August 4, 2014 7:01:15 PM

go for an intel i5 or a 6300 or higher because the cpu will bottleneck your system
m
0
l
August 4, 2014 7:23:00 PM

as sead above i am a expert in pc components but wanted to know if the fx-4350 would bottleneck the 760's, as i did not find fx-4350 or other amd cpu benchmarks, also it has to be a AM3+ cpu.
m
0
l
a b à CPUs
August 4, 2014 11:25:35 PM

The FX-4350 would be fine with a single GTX-760. It's not an exact science, more an educated guess since you will rarely find benchmarks that confirm bottle necking with that exact hardware.
m
0
l
August 5, 2014 4:34:52 AM

that is true, people with IRL experience maybe knew i thought, but now i wonder if anyone could suggest a AM3+ cpu that won't bottleneck 2-way SLI with GTX760's, and rather one with a tdp under 180w
m
0
l
a c 2618 à CPUs
August 5, 2014 7:32:48 AM

FX8350 would pair well with 2 - 760's.
m
0
l
August 5, 2014 3:20:28 PM

i thought so from the beginning, but wasent sure. i guess i can trust the top dog
m
0
l

Best solution

Anonymous
a b à CPUs
August 5, 2014 3:30:10 PM

The 4350 is fairly darn weak tbh
You have to remember that even though it's marketed as a quad-core, in actuality it's a dual-core chip.
The same scales linearly with the rest of the FX line.

AMD uses 'modules' over traditional physical cores. It's quite an interesting die-design. It means for each physical core, or 'module' there's 2 logical cores inside it. They're smaller and less efficient than a large physical core and they share the same cache with each other, but they get the job done.
The 4350 then, uses two of them.
6350 - 3.
and, 8350 - 4.

The reason it's not so great is purely down to their poor efficiency. They're small cores and as such don't perform that well on their own. The 8350 however, having 8 modules performs pretty decently, but I wouldn't go for anything below that.

With a half-decent AM3+ board you could easily pop in 'said 8350 and have it work straight away. It consumes a bit more power but I'm sure even the most basic of power supplies can handle it.
(Especially if you're considering a second card).

Two 760s would be quite a nice setup, something I don't think the 4350 could handle on its own. I'm not sure about the 8350, but it should be alright.
Share
August 5, 2014 4:03:12 PM

thank you for giving me a anwser and not fucking around like the rest,:) 
m
0
l