Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

EVGA GTX 760 is better than MSI,gigabyte,asus and others

Tags:
  • EVGA
  • Gigabyte
  • Gtx
  • MSI
  • Graphics
  • Asus
Last response: in Graphics & Displays
Share
August 4, 2014 10:55:54 PM

i am confused

More about : evga gtx 760 msi gigabyte asus

August 4, 2014 11:02:10 PM

According to techpowerup's data clearly shows that the MSI Twin Frozr version is the best - it runs the quietest by far and is second only to the ASUS in terms of cooling (the ASUS has a slightly lower load temp), but I think that the extremely quiet operation of the MSI more than makes up for that.

The MSI version overclocked the best in their tests as well, although the EVGA version wasn't far behind, to be fair.

However, the EVGA is definitely loud, and idle/load temps are pretty high.

Noise:
MSI = 25dbA idle / 27dbA load
ASUS = 25dbA idle / 33dbA load
Gigabyte = 27dbA idle / 34dbA load
EVGA = 26dbA idle / 38 dbA load

Temps:
MSI = 29C idle / 69C load / 70C overclocked load
ASUS = 29C idle / 68C load / 74C overclocked load
Gigabyte = 36C idle / 68C load / 70C overclocked load
EVGA = 33C idle / 72C load / 76C overclocked load

As you can see, the MSI version wins pretty much everywhere.

link to GPU

http://www.msi.com/product/vga/N760_TF_2GD5OC.html#hero...
m
0
l
August 4, 2014 11:15:01 PM

how about zotac card ?? is it reliable ??
m
0
l
Related resources
August 4, 2014 11:16:14 PM

dont go for zotac.... MSI, Asus, Evga, Gigabyte are the best.... pick any 1 which suits ur budget....
m
0
l
August 4, 2014 11:24:40 PM

bro msi,asus cards are available in india and only 20,000 but i kind of liked the evga card but that is not available here but it is available in amazon so i can't figure out how much it will cost for an international shipping...
m
0
l
August 5, 2014 1:37:12 AM

i understand ur feeling bro even i live in India.... the prb with importing is u might have to pay customs.... Warranty is a prb though EVGA product are covered under international warranty the product u purchase from(like amazon USA) u will hav to sent it back (USA) if something goes wrong.... the sending fees is borne by the company.... but once the company is sending back the product u will be the person who pays for it....

link to evga usa/canada warranty....

http://www.evga.com/support/warranty/
m
0
l
August 5, 2014 1:57:00 AM

isn't evga got a good reputation for product reliability and customer support i mean there are less chances u r going to get a faulty card
m
0
l
August 5, 2014 2:02:34 AM

the product r reliable and customer support is good but, what if something does happen wht will u do....
m
0
l
August 5, 2014 2:11:04 AM

hmm u r right but if the product is good then i think its right to take the risk. I am not buying it right now just considering facts. the market is wide open
anyways what is your suggestion ??
what can u tell me about radeon r9 280x ? it this card is as good as a gtx 770
one more thing is amazon.in is reliable ??
m
0
l
August 5, 2014 2:33:31 AM

can a gtx 760 handle game like AC unity, dragon age Inquisition, watch dogs, wolfenstein the new order,middle earth shadow of mordor, witcher 3,far cry 4, the crew, dead rising 3,gta 5 ,call of duty AW on close to ultra 1920x1080 with anti aliasing and ambient occlusion off ??
m
0
l
August 5, 2014 2:45:39 AM

u should be able to play this game on on high to very high even ultra (depending upon the game) setting at 1920x1080.... but in CPU-bound games like Crysis 3 and Battlefield 4, it may get a little bit bottlenecked.
m
0
l
August 5, 2014 2:58:29 AM

bro 40 fps is all i need i mean human eye can't tell the difference between 30 fps and 60 fps. less than 30 may b irritating and already finished crysis 3 and battlefield 4 but waiting for battlefield hardline
so how many avg fps i am going to get for those games ??
i am using i3 2120 currently but soon will upgrade to i5 3450
m
0
l
August 5, 2014 3:00:37 AM

heman0286 said:
According to techpowerup's data clearly shows that the MSI Twin Frozr version is the best - it runs the quietest by far and is second only to the ASUS in terms of cooling (the ASUS has a slightly lower load temp), but I think that the extremely quiet operation of the MSI more than makes up for that.

The MSI version overclocked the best in their tests as well, although the EVGA version wasn't far behind, to be fair.

However, the EVGA is definitely loud, and idle/load temps are pretty high.

Noise:
MSI = 25dbA idle / 27dbA load
ASUS = 25dbA idle / 33dbA load
Gigabyte = 27dbA idle / 34dbA load
EVGA = 26dbA idle / 38 dbA load

Temps:
MSI = 29C idle / 69C load / 70C overclocked load
ASUS = 29C idle / 68C load / 74C overclocked load
Gigabyte = 36C idle / 68C load / 70C overclocked load
EVGA = 33C idle / 72C load / 76C overclocked load

As you can see, the MSI version wins pretty much everywhere.

link to GPU

http://www.msi.com/product/vga/N760_TF_2GD5OC.html#hero...


MSI N760 HAWK the best graphic card of all 760 series, core clock 1111Mhz Boost clock 1176MHz
http://www.newegg.com/global/uk/Product/Product.aspx?It...
m
0
l
August 5, 2014 3:01:52 AM

salilskp said:
bro 40 fps is all i need i mean human eye can't tell the difference between 30 fps and 60 fps. less than 30 may b irritating


you sir, have no idea what you're talking about
m
0
l
August 5, 2014 3:03:27 AM

salilskp said:
bro 40 fps is all i need i mean human eye can't tell the difference between 30 fps and 60 fps. less than 30 may b irritating and already finished crysis 3 and battlefield 4 but waiting for battlefield hardline
so how many avg fps i am going to get for those games ??
i am using i3 2120 currently but soon will upgrade to i5 3450


anyways, you're going to get about 30 average on low i'm guessing.
m
0
l
August 5, 2014 3:14:49 AM

Kendo4life1 said:
salilskp said:
bro 40 fps is all i need i mean human eye can't tell the difference between 30 fps and 60 fps. less than 30 may b irritating and already finished crysis 3 and battlefield 4 but waiting for battlefield hardline
so how many avg fps i am going to get for those games ??
i am using i3 2120 currently but soon will upgrade to i5 3450


anyways, you're going to get about 30 average on low i'm guessing.



you are saying that 760 can't run on very high settings even ultra ??
m
0
l
August 5, 2014 3:16:51 AM

anyways ur r not goin to buy the cards right now.... ill advice u to wait for the GTX 800 series it rumored be released by anywhere from q1 to q4 of this year.it will be around 2 months after they release the 790..... even if GTX 800 is not compatible with our pc.... atleast the price of the old GPU will fall....
m
0
l
August 5, 2014 3:21:28 AM

salilskp said:
Kendo4life1 said:
salilskp said:
bro 40 fps is all i need i mean human eye can't tell the difference between 30 fps and 60 fps. less than 30 may b irritating and already finished crysis 3 and battlefield 4 but waiting for battlefield hardline
so how many avg fps i am going to get for those games ??
i am using i3 2120 currently but soon will upgrade to i5 3450


anyways, you're going to get about 30 average on low i'm guessing.



you are saying that 760 can't run on very high settings even ultra ??


i'm expecting it yeah, maybe medium would be playable, but definitely not high, due to his cpu.

i'm running a i7 2600k with a 770 and i can just run high-ultra at 50 fps.
m
0
l
August 5, 2014 4:18:09 AM

Kendo4life1 said:
salilskp said:
Kendo4life1 said:
salilskp said:
bro 40 fps is all i need i mean human eye can't tell the difference between 30 fps and 60 fps. less than 30 may b irritating and already finished crysis 3 and battlefield 4 but waiting for battlefield hardline
so how many avg fps i am going to get for those games ??
i am using i3 2120 currently but soon will upgrade to i5 3450


anyways, you're going to get about 30 average on low i'm guessing.



you are saying that 760 can't run on very high settings even ultra ??


i'm expecting it yeah, maybe medium would be playable, but definitely not high, due to his cpu.

i'm running a i7 2600k with a 770 and i can just run high-ultra at 50 fps.




what is your resolution ??
m
0
l
August 5, 2014 4:19:36 AM

heman0286 said:
anyways ur r not goin to buy the cards right now.... ill advice u to wait for the GTX 800 series it rumored be released by anywhere from q1 to q4 of this year.it will be around 2 months after they release the 790..... even if GTX 800 is not compatible with our pc.... atleast the price of the old GPU will fall....



i am not going to buy this month but probably next month
m
0
l
August 5, 2014 4:32:50 AM

salilskp said:
Kendo4life1 said:
salilskp said:
Kendo4life1 said:
salilskp said:
bro 40 fps is all i need i mean human eye can't tell the difference between 30 fps and 60 fps. less than 30 may b irritating and already finished crysis 3 and battlefield 4 but waiting for battlefield hardline
so how many avg fps i am going to get for those games ??
i am using i3 2120 currently but soon will upgrade to i5 3450


anyways, you're going to get about 30 average on low i'm guessing.



you are saying that 760 can't run on very high settings even ultra ??


i'm expecting it yeah, maybe medium would be playable, but definitely not high, due to his cpu.

i'm running a i7 2600k with a 770 and i can just run high-ultra at 50 fps.




what is your resolution ??


i'm running a 1920x1080p monitor
m
0
l
August 5, 2014 4:41:46 AM

as per game debate Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor's recomended requirements are
Core i7-3770 4-Core 3.4GHz
GeForce GTX 670
8 GB ram
40 GB
gtx 760 and gtx 670 are practically same
m
0
l
August 5, 2014 4:45:25 AM

Kendo4life1 said:
salilskp said:
Kendo4life1 said:
salilskp said:
Kendo4life1 said:
salilskp said:
bro 40 fps is all i need i mean human eye can't tell the difference between 30 fps and 60 fps. less than 30 may b irritating and already finished crysis 3 and battlefield 4 but waiting for battlefield hardline
so how many avg fps i am going to get for those games ??
i am using i3 2120 currently but soon will upgrade to i5 3450


anyways, you're going to get about 30 average on low i'm guessing.



you are saying that 760 can't run on very high settings even ultra ??


i'm expecting it yeah, maybe medium would be playable, but definitely not high, due to his cpu.

i'm running a i7 2600k with a 770 and i can just run high-ultra at 50 fps.




what is your resolution ??


i'm running a 1920x1080p monitor


how much anti aliasing and ambient occlusion are u using ??
m
0
l
August 5, 2014 4:59:01 AM

salilskp said:
Kendo4life1 said:
salilskp said:
Kendo4life1 said:
salilskp said:
Kendo4life1 said:
salilskp said:
bro 40 fps is all i need i mean human eye can't tell the difference between 30 fps and 60 fps. less than 30 may b irritating and already finished crysis 3 and battlefield 4 but waiting for battlefield hardline
so how many avg fps i am going to get for those games ??
i am using i3 2120 currently but soon will upgrade to i5 3450


anyways, you're going to get about 30 average on low i'm guessing.



you are saying that 760 can't run on very high settings even ultra ??


i'm expecting it yeah, maybe medium would be playable, but definitely not high, due to his cpu.

i'm running a i7 2600k with a 770 and i can just run high-ultra at 50 fps.




what is your resolution ??


i'm running a 1920x1080p monitor


how much anti aliasing and ambient occlusion are u using ??


2x AA, ambient off i think
m
0
l
August 5, 2014 5:01:05 AM

salilskp said:
as per game debate Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor's recomended requirements are
Core i7-3770 4-Core 3.4GHz
GeForce GTX 670
8 GB ram
40 GB
gtx 760 and gtx 670 are practically same


to answer your question, i would go with either the MSI or Asus 760.
check for clock frequency and power consumption, also keep the price in mind.

hope that helps you
m
0
l
!