Silibant :
Rationale :
Yes. The FX-4150 is certainly a bottleneck for your GTX 770.
If you look at Watch Dogs benchmarks, an FX-6350 (overclocked FX-6300) performs similarly to an i3-4130, just a few fps less than the FX-8350. If you're going for Intel and an i7 eventually anyway and won't overclock, wouldn't it make more sense to get an H87 or H97 board now, with an i3, and then just wait for the i7? Otherwise you're replacing both the CPU and mobo twice.
I noticed that the i3 4310 is a dual core. Are there i3s that are quad core? If so, are they still cheaper than a quad-core i5? Thanks very much for explaining all this.
There are no quad-core i3s, but they do run 4 threads despite having two cores, due to hyper threading.
Anyway, as mentioned, even with 2 cores they're still stronger than a stock FX-6300 in games, and would open up a much easier upgrade path to an i7.
Besides, if there
*was* a quad-core i3, it'd just be called an i7. :3
Intel uses the same core architecture for all their new CPUs; the names "i3, i5, i7, etc" are determined by the number of cores, threads and software support, since individually they use the same parts and cores.
Celerons are underclocked dual cores, kind of a crippled version of the Pentium meant for ultra low cost.
Pentiums are normal dual cores, roughly 1/2 of an i5 when both are clocked the same.
i3s are dual cores with HT, roughly 1/2 of an i7 when both are clocked the same.
i5s are normal quad-cores.
i7s are quad-cores with HT.