I3-4150 оr FX-6300?
Tags:
-
CPUs
Last response: in CPUs
momca121212
August 8, 2014 11:46:46 AM
DarkBloodline
August 8, 2014 11:52:35 AM
Related resources
- low budget cpu: i3-4150 vs fx-6300 vs fx-4350 - Forum
- Will a r9 270x bottleneck a i3-4150 - Forum
- Will an i3-4150 bottleneck a R9-280x - Forum
- Will an i3-4150 bottleneck a Radeon R9 270X? - Forum
- is i3-4150 enough for R9 270 (not X) - Forum
Hello... http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=Intel+Core+i3-4...
http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=AMD+FX-6300+Six...
2 physical VS 3 physical cores.
http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=AMD+FX-6300+Six...
2 physical VS 3 physical cores.
-
Reply to Ironsounds
m
0
l
TopLuca said:
The Problem with running games won't be the processors , both are fine but your GPU isn't. The AMD will be cheaper to buy because of the motherboard and then you can save money towards the GPU , however the Intel has more upgrade route and is slightly ahead in gaming.Exactly!
The i3 is indeed better than the FX6300 in most games and it's great having the option to upgrade to an i5 later on, because the FX8XXX series aren't worth it.
-
Reply to Alex Kelly
m
0
l
See the attached comparison, as I said, Intel I3 in this case.
http://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i3-4150...
http://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i3-4150...
-
Reply to avenseth12
m
0
l
-
Reply to LukaBoki
m
0
l
momca121212
August 8, 2014 12:12:26 PM
Ironsounds said:
Hello... The value is, With the Intel MB's is that you will be able to Install a i7 right into and sell the i3 later... I Like the easy Upgrade ( performance ) option I can give a Customer of mine.Yup! And an ASRock Z97M Anniversary edition board paired with a Pentium G3258 will give you even better performance than an i3, if you're comfortable with overclocking. Then, you can buy an unlocked K series i5 or i7 later on and OC that too.
-
Reply to Alex Kelly
m
0
l
Alex Kelly said:
Ironsounds said:
Hello... The value is, With the Intel MB's is that you will be able to Install a i7 right into and sell the i3 later... I Like the easy Upgrade ( performance ) option I can give a Customer of mine.Yup! And an ASRock Z97M Anniversary edition board paired with a Pentium G3258 will give you even better performance than an i3, if you're comfortable with overclocking. Then, you can buy an unlocked K series i5 or i7 later on and OC that too.
Couldn't agree more
-
Reply to TopLuca
m
0
l
momca121212 said:
thanks .I ll buy i3-4XXX.But why 6 cores and 14mb cache aren t better than 2 cores, HT and 3mb cache?AMD CPUs have two integer cores per modules, but one single floating point core. So your 6 core AMD CPU is really three core with something similar to hyperthreading for pure floating point operations. Of course, this is not the end of story because AMD and Intel cores aren't the same. Intel CPUs tend you give you more performance per core, so single threaded or lightly threaded applications will do very well with something like a Core i3.
-
Reply to K6-II
m
0
l
Hello... Yes, There is no standard blue print that INTEL and AMD follow to make a CPU core... Each one is made with a different procedure and performance tweaks. And some tests will show better results between the TWO... design your Computer for the Software you plan on to be using... AND also to how long you want to use it ( Upgrade? )
-
Reply to Ironsounds
m
0
l
momca121212
August 8, 2014 1:32:26 PM
Check this link http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-Pentium-G3450-vs-Intel-Co...
G3450 is not hyperthreaded, i3-4150 has this cool Intel® HD graphics 4400. In conclusion if you're using it for gaming a similar solution to i3-4150
G3450 is not hyperthreaded, i3-4150 has this cool Intel® HD graphics 4400. In conclusion if you're using it for gaming a similar solution to i3-4150
-
Reply to K6-II
m
0
l
The amount of cores means absolutely nothing.
The Pentium G3258 running at stock (2 cores) outperforms the overclocked FX-8350 (8 cores) under some workloads, including gaming. http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/2014/06/24/intel-penti...
The Pentium G3258 running at stock (2 cores) outperforms the overclocked FX-8350 (8 cores) under some workloads, including gaming. http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/2014/06/24/intel-penti...
-
Reply to Alex Kelly
m
0
l
Did a bit of searching and found out that FX 6300 it's a better value for gaming. The 4150 or G3258 both have hyperthreading technology which is beneficial for applications optimized for that. For games, the number of threads is largely irrelevant, more important for gaming than the number of cores and threads is the clock rate. Aside from the clock rate, the next-most important CPU features for PC game performance are L2 and L3 cache size. Faster than RAM, the more cache available, the more data that can be stored for lightning-fast retrieval.
Fx 6300(6 cores) L3 cache is 8 MB / 1.33Mb/core rather than i3-4150(2 cores) L3 cache 3 MB 1.5Mb/core
I'd chose the Fx 6300
Fx 6300(6 cores) L3 cache is 8 MB / 1.33Mb/core rather than i3-4150(2 cores) L3 cache 3 MB 1.5Mb/core
I'd chose the Fx 6300
-
Reply to K6-II
m
0
l
momca121212
August 9, 2014 2:57:56 AM
An overclocked Pentium G3258.
If you don't want to mess with overclocking, the i3 4130 is the next best thing in my opinion.
The FX 6300 is good, but it draws more power and if you go with Intel you get the option of upgrading to an i5 later on, whereas if you went with AMD and wanted to upgrade you'd have to go with a FX 8XXX series, which are just terrible value to be honest.
If you don't want to mess with overclocking, the i3 4130 is the next best thing in my opinion.
The FX 6300 is good, but it draws more power and if you go with Intel you get the option of upgrading to an i5 later on, whereas if you went with AMD and wanted to upgrade you'd have to go with a FX 8XXX series, which are just terrible value to be honest.
-
Reply to Alex Kelly
m
0
l
momca121212
August 9, 2014 3:06:40 AM
momca121212
August 9, 2014 3:08:08 AM
That's incorrect. Again I'll ask, where are you getting this information from? Your own estimations?
Cores aren't everything. As plenty of us have already said.
I used an i3 4130 with my GTX 760 and it could max out every game I threw at it at very playable frame rates.
Barely noticed a difference when I stepped up to my i5.
Cores aren't everything. As plenty of us have already said.
I used an i3 4130 with my GTX 760 and it could max out every game I threw at it at very playable frame rates.
Barely noticed a difference when I stepped up to my i5.
-
Reply to Alex Kelly
m
0
l
momca121212
August 9, 2014 3:20:02 AM
Alex Kelly said:
That's incorrect. Again I'll ask, where are you getting this information from? Your own estimations? Cores aren't everything. As plenty of us have already said.
I used an i3 4130 with my GTX 760 and it could max out every game I threw at it at very playable frame rates.
Barely noticed a difference when I stepped up to my i5.
I know what you mean but considering momca121212 graphic card (hd6570) he needs 4 core CPU to be able to play on medium settings
-
Reply to K6-II
m
0
l
momca121212
August 9, 2014 3:34:02 AM
momca121212
August 9, 2014 4:26:36 AM
Related resources
- SolvedFX-6300 Bottleneck R9 290x Forum
- SolvedMSI R9 270x and AMD FX-6300 gaming performance Forum
- SolvedFX-6300 Overclocking on M5A97 LE R2.0 Forum
- Solvedis the amd fx-6300 compatible with the Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 ATX AM3+ Motherboard out of the box? or does it require a bios upda Forum
- SolvedAMD FX-6300 AMD R9 280X or AMD FX-8320 AMD R9 285 Forum
- SolvedR9 280X 3GB with and FX-6300 OC Forum
- Solvedamd fx-6300 vishera combo with XFX Radeon R7 265 2GB Video Card any good Forum
- SolvedWill FX-6300 bottleneck with R9 285? Forum
- Solvedr9 280x with fx-6300 Forum
- SolvedIm making my first build, whats the best MOBO for an amd fx6300 and an r9 270x card? Forum
- SolvedAMD FX-6300 CPU + M5A78L-M LX3 Motherboard + RADEON R7 260X Forum
- SolvedWill Fx-6300 handle a overclock 2gb R9 270x Forum
- SolvedBest cheap (£25) PSU for r9 280 and fx6300 Forum
- SolvedFX-6300 and R7-265 in Corsair VS 450 Forum
- SolvedFirst build. ASUS M5A97 R2.0 with AMD FX-6300, no boot, no post. Help appreciated. Forum
- More resources
!
