Hi all,
I am curious to know whether clock speeds or sheer number of cores is more important for integrated GPU's, particularly the intel 4600. I will be building a budget home PC for my mum and younger brother, and light gaming such as minecraft is a necessity. A dedicated GPU will be added at a later date but cant be done immediately due to financial reasons. Although I'm not expecting there to be a massive difference, How well does the intel 4600 graphics compare between an i3 at 3.7Ghz or an i5 at 3.2Ghz. In particular the models i3-4660 and i5-4460. The price difference here in Aus is only $23 however the next model down i3 is only 100Mhz slower and would save early $40. What do you think is the best option?
Thanks everyone who takes the time to read this thread.
I am curious to know whether clock speeds or sheer number of cores is more important for integrated GPU's, particularly the intel 4600. I will be building a budget home PC for my mum and younger brother, and light gaming such as minecraft is a necessity. A dedicated GPU will be added at a later date but cant be done immediately due to financial reasons. Although I'm not expecting there to be a massive difference, How well does the intel 4600 graphics compare between an i3 at 3.7Ghz or an i5 at 3.2Ghz. In particular the models i3-4660 and i5-4460. The price difference here in Aus is only $23 however the next model down i3 is only 100Mhz slower and would save early $40. What do you think is the best option?
Thanks everyone who takes the time to read this thread.
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram