To Upgrade or not ... GTX 680 SLI --> AMD R9 290 Crossfire

magnusvermagnussen

Honorable
Jan 23, 2014
8
0
10,520
I am currently running a Gigabyte GTX 680 2GB SLI setup on an I5 2500k (O/C'd to 4.3 GHz) with 8GB RAM.

So, I've been noticing that some of my games (World of Tanks, War Thunder Ground Forces) have been chugging with any AA enabled and at full resolution (5890x1080 resolution on 3 x Acer H236HL 23" monitors). With World of Tanks, I'm consistently under 30fps (between 17 and 27), and with War Thunder I'm at or around 30 (hovering around 27-35).

I know the extra 2GB of VRAM will make a difference with the AA, and it would appear as though the increase in fps (probably around 20-30%?) might justify an upgrade.

I can purchase two R9 290's for $275 each, and, assuming I can get about $200 per GTX 680, my net upgrade cost will be about $150.

$150 for a 25% boost in performance is pretty reasonable for me, but the question I have is whether there are any issues with 290 cards (especially in Crossfire) that I should be aware of.

I've searched the forums and know they tend to run hotter, and some of the reference cards have a 'leaking' (whatever that means) problem from the fan area. Otherwise though, they seem like a great bang for the buck.

Does anyone have their two cents to throw in here? Are my performance projections somewhat off the mark/unrealistic/completely out to lunch? Any comments on the R9 290 cards in general?

Thanks!
 
Solution
I was on the same situation as you before. I own a gtx 670 2gb sli. I upgraded to a r9 290 xfire sapphire tri x because I got a good deal one was for $250 and $280. Sold my gtx 670 sli for $300. We have the same monitor and resolution. Even with one r9 290 for a triple monitor set-up. The difference is night and day. Gameplay on bf4 was so smooth on high settings with one card than my sli. Avg fps is about 60+fps. It was a big improvement for me and when I xfire it cranked up the settings to ultra. It is still smooth and avg to 70+fps. No stuttering esp when there is smoke and explosion compared to my 670 sli. For the temps the top card gets hot max temp for mine was 80c and bottom was 60c. But it is really quiet. Just get a good...

paopaw07

Honorable
Nov 27, 2013
67
0
10,640
I was on the same situation as you before. I own a gtx 670 2gb sli. I upgraded to a r9 290 xfire sapphire tri x because I got a good deal one was for $250 and $280. Sold my gtx 670 sli for $300. We have the same monitor and resolution. Even with one r9 290 for a triple monitor set-up. The difference is night and day. Gameplay on bf4 was so smooth on high settings with one card than my sli. Avg fps is about 60+fps. It was a big improvement for me and when I xfire it cranked up the settings to ultra. It is still smooth and avg to 70+fps. No stuttering esp when there is smoke and explosion compared to my 670 sli. For the temps the top card gets hot max temp for mine was 80c and bottom was 60c. But it is really quiet. Just get a good airflow on your case and a non reference card esp if you find a trix for a good deal. I say just grab it without hesitation. Also just so you know I run my r9 290 xfire on a 750w psu seasonic x gold with my cpu oced with no problems. But I bough a seasonic x1050, i just haven't installed it yet because I'm lazy. Just upgrade to r9 290 esp for our resolution. You will not regret it. Goodluck
 
Solution

magnusvermagnussen

Honorable
Jan 23, 2014
8
0
10,520


Wow, thanks for that! This is why this forum is great- even though this is one of my first posts, I have observed from others that you're bound to find someone with an almost identical setup who faced an almost identical choice (the speed diff. between 670 and 680 is negligible to nada for some games).

Thank you for the input!