GTX 770 2GB can it handle 1920x1080 at max settings for games like crysis 3,battlefield 4,witcher 3,wolfenstein the new order

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
M

mohamed8989

Distinguished
May 13, 2014
60
0
18,630
GTX 770 2GB can it handle 1920x1080 at max settings for games like crysis 3,battlefield 4,witcher 3,wolfenstein the new order,arma 3,titanfall. between 100 to 144 fps or do i need to get sli
i really don't want to get sli

my rig
1 INTEL CORE I7 -4770K
2 GIGABYTE GTX 770 2GB DDR5 OVERCLOKED EXTREME
3 RM Series™ RM750 — 750 Watt 80 PLUS® Gold Certified Fully Modular PSU
4 CORSAIR HYDRO SERIES H100I HIGH PERFOMANCE LIQUID CPU COOLER
5 GIGABYTE GA-Z87X UD4H SOCKET 1150 PROCESSOR 4TH GENERATION MOTHERBOARD
8 WINDOWS 8.1 PRO
9 G.SKILL Ripjaws X Series 16GB (2 x 8GB) 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 1600 (PC3 12800) Desktop Memory Model F3-12800CL10D-16GBXL
10 CASE(Cooler Master Storm Trooper Case )
12 WESTERN DIGITAL 1 TB SATA 7200RPM 64MB CACHE INTERNAL DESKTOP HARDDRIVE BLACK WD1003FZEX
 
Solution
MeteorsRaining
Lol yes it can handle those games very well, 100+FPS in not garuanteed on ultra but 60+ FPS is for sure.
High-very high settings and it goes over 80 FPS.
ABSOLUTELY NO NEED to get SLI for single FHD that too of 770s.
You're good to go with a single GTX 770 for those games on max on FHD :)
Sort by date Sort by votes
MeteorsRaining

MeteorsRaining

Champion
Jul 27, 2014
8,346
3
50,565
Lol yes it can handle those games very well, 100+FPS in not garuanteed on ultra but 60+ FPS is for sure.
High-very high settings and it goes over 80 FPS.
ABSOLUTELY NO NEED to get SLI for single FHD that too of 770s.
You're good to go with a single GTX 770 for those games on max on FHD :)
 
Upvote 1 Downvote
Solution
G

Guest

Guest
I have a gigabyte 770 oc 4 gb and all my settings are on ultra on BF 4. It does sometimes dip below 60 fps during multiplayer but not very often, not by much and not for very long. If you need 100+ fps on ultra then SLI or 780 ti.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
G

Guest

Guest
Do you have a 120-144Hz monitor ? If not you don't need more than 60 FPS (or your monitor's refresh rate). And are you using your PC for gaming only ? You could get a better GFX card and get those extra frames that you want just by switching the i7 for an i5. You could also reduce the RAM count without having any impact on your gaming performance.

In this case, I would personally go with an Haswell-U setup. Getting that i5-4690k to the i7-4770k's performance is known to be pretty easy.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
B

bryjoered

Honorable
Jul 26, 2012
207
0
10,710
I had a 770 4gb, and even that can't maintain constant 60 fps on BF4, it would dip into the 20s occasionally I'm not even joking. I returned it and got the 780 6gb and now have close to 100 fps most of the time. The problem with the 2gb version of the 770 is vram requirements. BF4 uses over 2gb, Titanfall uses WAY over 2gb and so does Watch Dogs. You'd probably be ok with the 4gb version of the 770 for quite some time, but don't get the 2gb version. BF4 is a weird game, I feel like the stutters and dips are not even related to the graphical settings, but rather the terrible network code that hitches up all the time when a lot is going on.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
B

bryjoered

Honorable
Jul 26, 2012
207
0
10,710
SLI, is not really worth it, so many compatibility problems with it. It's better to just get one kick ass card. The 780 ti is technically the most powerful single GPU card besides maybe the Titan Black on the Nvidia side. I would definitely wait for a 6gb 780ti before jumping on it or just get the black if you have the cash.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
M

mohamed8989

Distinguished
May 13, 2014
60
0
18,630
i want to get xl2420z benq i know i will not reach 100fps but in future i might get new gbu so in 60 fps the monitor is it good and can i play fps games in 120 fps if i lower the setting in 1920x1080
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
B

bryjoered

Honorable
Jul 26, 2012
207
0
10,710


In my opinion, some form of AA is the second most important setting after resolution. You can go with SMAA or FXAA to eliminate most jaggies without a big performance impact, but there is blurring of textures. MSAA 4x is pretty much all you need, but it doesn't work for transparent textures like foliage or chain link fences. Nvidia has an AA called TXAA which is supposed to be MSAA quality and also applies to transparent textures, some hate this as well because it can be blurry.

Rule of Thumb for me is Resolution>AA>Texture Quality>Shadows and Lighting>Effects like explosions, bullet marks etc.
 
Upvote 1 Downvote
S

SirCasm101

Reputable
Aug 24, 2014
3
0
4,510
Crysis 3 - high
Bf4 - ultra
Witcher 3 - ultra
Wolfenstein - ultra-ish
Arma 3 - ultra
TitanfAll-ultra

All at about 40-60 fps. It's useless to get 120-144 hz unless you have a monitor of that sort.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
B

bryjoered

Honorable
Jul 26, 2012
207
0
10,710


Not to mention anything past 40 looks great to the average person, 60 or 100 fps is better and all that jazz i'll take the eye candy and play at 40 anyday though, just my opinion obviously.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
G

Guest

Guest


You may want to get a lower-end CPU. If you're only using this computer for gaming, you don't need that much power. The cash you'll save can be put in a GTX 780 for exemple, which will grant you those extra FPS that you want.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts

Moderators online

Share this page

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom