zeazin :
IInuyasha74 :
The AMD R9 280x is much much faster than the AMD HD 7950. The R9 280x is a rebranded AMD Radeon HD 7970 Ghz Edition, while the R9 280 without the "x" is a rebranded AMD Radeon HD 7950. So it is quite a bit more expensive, but the R9 280 might also be out of your budget there.
If it is, unfortunately it doesn't matter what graphics card you buy it will be a step down performance wise. You might try doing some stuff to fix your old card instead.
Yea, thats roughly the conclusion I was reaching too, hence why I dropped the idea of getting a real upgrade without dropping a lot of money. I'm fairly sure my current card is very very close to death. A few of my more technically minded friends have had a look to see if they could do anything and they couldn't. Shame. I think ~I might just go for the 280. It's painful to pay that much for the same as I currently have, but oh well. Can't always win. Thanks for the suggestions guys. Much appreciated.
Not sure what they tried, but encase they didn't try this, you could and it might make it a little longer. If you clean it extremely well, take off the cooler on the back of the card, and clean off the thermal paste then put new really good thermal paste on that will help cool it.
After that, boot the system and go into Catalyst Control Center. Go to "Performance" and "AMD Overdrive".
Accept the warning thing. Your card is already dying so whats the worst it can do? lol
Anyways the idea is to underclock your graphics card at this point. This will lower your performance, but if you drop it down by maybe 100Mhz, lower the power a little bit the heat will be greatly reduced and the card isn't working nearly as hard anymore. Since its common graphics cards that are aging just can't handle as high of a clock speed anymore when they act as you have described, its a fair chance that this might fix the problem and keep it running.
Performance will go down, but you won't be out a big chunk of cash.