Amd cpu using smt multithreading ? (2015)

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
G

Game890

Reputable
Apr 4, 2014
49
0
4,530
Hi guys...

Im thinking to wait for New intel 5th gen or AMD CPU rather then going for AMD FX-9590 or Intel i7 4770k CPU

We all knows intel cpu is the best but Intel CPU are very Expensive

Wanted to buy AMD FX-9590 because of its low price *core &5.0 GHz but the cpu is a thermal disaster and i7 4700k is much better than FX-9590 and giving higher FPS compared to i7 4770k.......So thats a No for AMD cpu for me

That's why I'm waiting for year 2015 for New AMD CPU using (SMT)

So I have seen in forum & Article and video like this :-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EVBY7zw-o0M

That,

In year 2015 AMD will no longer be using CMT multithreading.They are going to use SMT multithreading in thir CPU chip like Intel

Is this true about AMD using SMT multi threading ?

Will AMD CPU be cooler and better performance for gaming? wanna know more......

Should I wait.?

Thank you for helping :)
 
Solution
Rationale
Intel is *not* more expensive for the performance. Intel has the better price/performance ratio for gaming.
There is a reason AMD is losing money, losing their market share, and ditching manufacturing in countries that use minimum wages; they have no advantage outside of rendering.

The Pentium G3258 matches the Athlon 760K, for $70 (Pentium) versus $90 (Athlon).
The i3-4150 matches or beats the FX-6300, for $125 (i3) versus $120 (FX).
The i3-4360 matches the FX-8350, for $160 versus $160.
The i5-4590 beats the FX-9370, for $200 (i5) versus $230 (FX).
The Xeon E3-1230V3 beats the FX-9590, for $250 (Xeon) versus $330 (FX).
There's nothing even close to the higher...
Sort by date Sort by votes
Rationale

Rationale

Admirable
Mar 21, 2014
3,025
0
7,960
Intel is *not* more expensive for the performance. Intel has the better price/performance ratio for gaming.
There is a reason AMD is losing money, losing their market share, and ditching manufacturing in countries that use minimum wages; they have no advantage outside of rendering.

The Pentium G3258 matches the Athlon 760K, for $70 (Pentium) versus $90 (Athlon).
The i3-4150 matches or beats the FX-6300, for $125 (i3) versus $120 (FX).
The i3-4360 matches the FX-8350, for $160 versus $160.
The i5-4590 beats the FX-9370, for $200 (i5) versus $230 (FX).
The Xeon E3-1230V3 beats the FX-9590, for $250 (Xeon) versus $330 (FX).
There's nothing even close to the higher clocked i7s.

More to the question, no SMT will not help AMD's heat or power consumption. Only switching to a smaller silicon process could make a significant impact on that, but that would require AMD to raise their prices even more, which would be a death sentence for them.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Solution
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts

Moderators online

Share this page

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom