Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon R7 265

Tags:
  • Components
  • Radeon
  • Build
  • Geforce
  • Nvidia
Last response: in Components
Share
August 27, 2014 3:41:57 PM

Both of these cards are roughly at the same price. I am using an amd 8320 and my current build(when i buy the parts) includes the 750 ti. but i did a little researching and alot shows that the r7 265 is better then the 750 ti.

i would be using my build for gaming and editing because im majoring in graphic arts/editing.

does it matter which one i use?

artical im referring to http://www.trustedreviews.com/opinions/radeon-r7-265-vs...

http://pcpartpicker.com/p/99dV23 - current build

More about : nvidia geforce gtx 750 radeon 265

a b Î Nvidia
August 27, 2014 3:46:16 PM

What software are you going to use? If you are using a lot of Adobe software, chances are that you will need CUDA (for Adobe After Effects for example).
m
0
l
August 27, 2014 5:08:03 PM

Shneiky said:
What software are you going to use? If you are using a lot of Adobe software, chances are that you will need CUDA (for Adobe After Effects for example).


its my freshmen year so i dont know what i'll be using, but another guy recommended the gtx 750 ti for editing
m
0
l
Related resources
August 31, 2014 9:19:53 PM

If you plan to use Sony Vegas, get the 265. OpenCL is faster than CUDA, but not a lot of editors actually let you use OpenCL.
m
0
l
September 14, 2014 3:34:26 AM

Radeon R7 265 is much better because it has 256bit
u may check the following specs of both card which u can decide

Radeon R7 265 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 750
Higher pixel rate 28.8 GPixel/s vs 16.32 GPixel/s More than 75% higher pixel rate
More render output processors 32 vs 16 Twice as many render output processors
Wider memory bus 256 bit vs 128 bit 2x wider memory bus
More shading units 1,024 vs 640 384 more shading units
More texture mapping units 64 vs 40 24 more texture mapping units
Higher clock speed 1,020 MHz vs 900 MHz Around 15% higher clock speed
Significantly higher turbo clock speed 1,085 MHz vs 925 MHz More than 15% higher turbo clock speed
Higher texture rate 82.64 GTexel/s vs 57.6 GTexel/s Around 45% higher texture rate
Higher memory clock speed 1,502 MHz vs 1,400 MHz More than 5% higher memory clock speed

hopefullly this should help u
m
0
l
September 14, 2014 7:51:06 AM

i think so,OpenCL is faster than CUDA, but not a lot of editors actually let you use OpenCL. thanks
m
0
l
!