Hi Guys, I am a bit confused and I hope you can help me make sence of this.
So I have been browsing the web too see how well does the kaveri work with the high end cards (280X,290X,780, etc...) just out of curiosity. And I found two sites with totally different yet weird benchmarks. this first site http://www.techspot.com/review/856-amd-a10-7800-kaveri/page7.html makes it seem like the APU are totally bottlenecked also the 8350 FX chips, which smells funny to me since my brother has the FX chip and all runs nicely. Could it be that its because they do test beyond 1080p? Second site test the A10 7800 with a R9 290 http://www.eteknix.com/amd-a10-7800-kaveri-apu-review/6/ and it seems the APU has no problems with the card no bottleneck. Which if that is true that is amazing, now I don't want to start a CPU war or APU is lame stuff, this just ended up leaving me confused.
What is your poinion, Thank you.
So I have been browsing the web too see how well does the kaveri work with the high end cards (280X,290X,780, etc...) just out of curiosity. And I found two sites with totally different yet weird benchmarks. this first site http://www.techspot.com/review/856-amd-a10-7800-kaveri/page7.html makes it seem like the APU are totally bottlenecked also the 8350 FX chips, which smells funny to me since my brother has the FX chip and all runs nicely. Could it be that its because they do test beyond 1080p? Second site test the A10 7800 with a R9 290 http://www.eteknix.com/amd-a10-7800-kaveri-apu-review/6/ and it seems the APU has no problems with the card no bottleneck. Which if that is true that is amazing, now I don't want to start a CPU war or APU is lame stuff, this just ended up leaving me confused.
What is your poinion, Thank you.