stay with fx 6300 or switch

skitz9417

Distinguished
hi im just wondering i do alot of rendering and converting and i like my fx 6300 but sometimes takes ages and im wondering would it be a good idea to swap to a fx 8320 or to a i5 or i7
 

plast0000

Distinguished
Jul 14, 2013
314
0
18,910


swap to fx 8320
 
The answer as to why AMD is cheaper is that they use 2 cores per module ideology to deduct costs. Each module has 2 cores and both of them share the same resources which results in lesser single core performance and less FPU.
Intel on the other hand use 1 core per module with solid performance and solid virtual cores as well. That's why Intel is good at performance but AMD has better performance/price ratio.
 

skitz9417

Distinguished

well firstly i use sony vegas and my specs are fx 6300 @4.5ghz gigabite ga-970a-upd3 and hd 7870 and antec 620m
 

logainofhades

Titan
Moderator
I would probably want an R9 290 for your triple monitor setup and doing video work like that. BTW, R9 280x and up do really well in Sony Vegas.

59491.png
 

logainofhades

Titan
Moderator


You still only have 2gb of ram available in crossfire.
 


Per display right? I mean one port on one card and another 2 on the other, which'll not have 2GB of VRAM per display.
 

logainofhades

Titan
Moderator


Crossfire doesn't double the amount of ram you have. You will still have 2gb usable ram, across all displays.