1600 mhz cas 7 vs 2133 cas 9 ram

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
Solution
Tradesman1
Less sticks is better but still want to populate all the channels to enable the full use of quad channel which is 4 sticks, you can go 2 sticks and run dual channel but that sor of defeats the purpose of buying a quad channel rig, to immediately hamper full possible performance, 2133/9 is better performance wise than 1600/7, 1866/9 and 1600/7 are about equal - and yes the Rampage supports 1866
Sort by date Sort by votes
Alan Sadowski

Alan Sadowski

Reputable
Sep 2, 2014
10
0
4,510


Thx, i read that using less sticks of ram is better. that is wjy i was opting for the 2x8, as for 1866 my specific motherboard doesnt support it. it jumps from 1600 to 2133. i also read that a lower cas can be better than jumping up in MHz, thas why i was wondering if the 1600/7 would actually be better/faster than the 2133/9
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Tradesman1

Tradesman1

Legenda in Aeternum
Jun 5, 2013
67,883
40
126,960
Less sticks is better but still want to populate all the channels to enable the full use of quad channel which is 4 sticks, you can go 2 sticks and run dual channel but that sor of defeats the purpose of buying a quad channel rig, to immediately hamper full possible performance, 2133/9 is better performance wise than 1600/7, 1866/9 and 1600/7 are about equal - and yes the Rampage supports 1866
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Solution
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts

Moderators online

Share this page

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom