Help me Pick a graphics card

Nappleman

Honorable
Sep 7, 2014
22
0
10,510
gtx 770 OC 339.99$
r9 280x toxic 369.99$
r9 290 gigabyte geforce 369.99$
Witch one will give me the most bang out of my buck?
 

Mario1011

Honorable
Aug 18, 2013
66
0
10,640
290 will give you the best bang for your buck, however AMD cards (especially Gigabyte) have been known to put out a lot more heat, so you might want to invest in a a good fan or just be conscious about where you seat the GPU and the placement of your computer.
 

Trenchcoat

Honorable
May 7, 2013
732
0
11,160
My pick is the 290 but you may be overspending. These are quite high end GFX and you need a system to match.

Full system specs and what you will use it for including display resolution please so we can save money/hassle.
 

Mario1011

Honorable
Aug 18, 2013
66
0
10,640
I agree that you should watch out for bottlenecking, but if you intend to buy a new system or upgrade parts later, you would be able to simply move such a GPU to that system later rather than buying an entirely new GPU when you have to upgrade.
 
The R9 290 is no doubt the best bang for the buck right now. If you have a good PSU and a good CPU then you should definitely get it. If not then either upgrade those parts too or buy a graphics card that matches your system better. You should never buy something like a toxic edition 280x over a 290 because the next step up is always better than a factory overclocked edition.
 

Nappleman

Honorable
Sep 7, 2014
22
0
10,510


I planned on building a gaming computer. Using a Fx 8350 processor, 8gb (2x4) g.skill x series. hopefully maxing out all games now and to come.
 

Nappleman

Honorable
Sep 7, 2014
22
0
10,510


very expensive im looking for a graphics card under 500$ thats a beast
 

Trenchcoat

Honorable
May 7, 2013
732
0
11,160


Your gaming display resolution is the most important factor to consider when buying a graphics card or even an entire system in some cases. Yes a 290 is awesome but if you're playing at 720p or 1280x1024 it's overkill. A 290 should be used in conjunction with an expensive FHD/QHD monitor that has a refresh rate over 60hz to get the most out of it. It can do 4k but not well.

I've seen another thread where someone spent over $1600 on graphics to game at 1080p on a tv. I don't want you to make a similar mistake by overspending on a gaming resolution.
 

Nappleman

Honorable
Sep 7, 2014
22
0
10,510


I planed on geting an ASUS VG248QE 24-inch LED-lit Monitor 144Hz refresh rate 1ms pixel response time & 3D capable. For this rig. Maybe you could recommend something as good and cheaper or more and better?
 

Trenchcoat

Honorable
May 7, 2013
732
0
11,160


3D is a gimmick, and it's a long dead talking point. Don't waste money on that tech. As for recommendations, I have none. 4k is on the horizon but I wouldn't buy it just yet, therefore if I were looking for a monitor to bridge the gap I'd want the least expensive feature rich monitor I could get to last 2-4 years.