I5 4670k overclock. Are these temps good ?

dazkyl

Honorable
Nov 3, 2013
1,036
0
11,290
Running 4.0ghz @ 1.20v with a CM V6GT cpu cooler.

Was planning on upgrading to the noctua for a 4.4ghz overclock , although my chip requires 1.280v for a stable 4.4ghz.


These temp are under load prime95.

http://oi58.tinypic.com/k341t1.jpg

Dunno why at idle temps are at 40s. Maybe of room temp ? (summer)
 
Solution
dazkyl,

I see that you ran P95 Version 26.6, so you must've read this: Intel Temperature Guide - http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/id-1800828/intel-temperature-guide.html

For the benefit of others who might be less informed, I'll re-post the following:

Section 11 - Thermal Testing @ 100% Workload

We all remember science class where one of the basic principals for conducting any scientifically controlled experiment, is that it's critical to follow the same procedure every time. This eliminated variables so results will be consistent and repeatable. If everyone is testing their rigs with X stress software at Y Ambient temperature with Z measuring software, then it's impossible to compare apples to apples.

This...

dazkyl

Honorable
Nov 3, 2013
1,036
0
11,290


80 is under full load with prime95. Isnt it a safe temp for under load ?
 
Your not out of line with your oc or temps.
I would expect a good cooler to be 10-15c. over ambient at idle.

I have become a bit jaded on the subject of haswell cooling for overclocking.
How high you can OC is firstly determined by your luck in the bin lottery.
I had high expectations from the Devil's canyon parts and their better thermals.
I found out that the thermals really do not matter unless, perhaps, you are a competitive overclocker.
Haswell runs quite cool, that is, until you raise the voltage past 1.25v or so.
Once you go past 1.3v, then you really do need very good cooling to keep stress loads under say 85c.
But, voltages higher than 1.30 are not a good thing for 24/7 usage.
Even if you can handle the heat, how much do you really need that extra multiplier from say 4.4 to 4.6?

I have changed from prime95 to OCCT for stress testing. It will shut down if your temps go over 85c.
 

dazkyl

Honorable
Nov 3, 2013
1,036
0
11,290


Fair enough.

The best i got was 4.4ghz @ 1.280v. Under stress test temps are 90s.

Should i stay @4.0 @1.2v until i get the noctua ?

I will oc back to 4.4ghz @ 1.280 when i buy the noctua. What temps shall i have with the noctua and 1.280v under stress test ?
 
I suspect you will get quieter operation with the noctua, but not significantly better temperatures.
Are you looking at the NH-D15? Be prepared, it is a massive cooler.

You could stick with 4.4 and not upgrade the cooler.
Under normal loads you will never reach stress test levels.
My suggestion to test with OCCT is because prime95 exercises the cpu in what I think is a less realistic way.
 

dazkyl

Honorable
Nov 3, 2013
1,036
0
11,290


I was going for that one.http://www.simarksupplies.com/ShowProduct.aspx/Product/P15250-Noctua-NHD14

But i belive its not good for a 1150 socket. I will probably go for the corsair h100 then.
 


 

CompuTronix

Intel Master
Moderator
dazkyl,

I see that you ran P95 Version 26.6, so you must've read this: Intel Temperature Guide - http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/id-1800828/intel-temperature-guide.html

For the benefit of others who might be less informed, I'll re-post the following:

Section 11 - Thermal Testing @ 100% Workload

We all remember science class where one of the basic principals for conducting any scientifically controlled experiment, is that it's critical to follow the same procedure every time. This eliminated variables so results will be consistent and repeatable. If everyone is testing their rigs with X stress software at Y Ambient temperature with Z measuring software, then it's impossible to compare apples to apples.

This is why processor temperatures continue to be a major source of confusion and debate. In this Section we'll explain how to properly test your rig. It's important to remember that we are not stress testing; we are thermal testing to produce a Core temperature benchmark.

Prime95 Small FFT's is the standard for CPU thermal testing, because it's a steady-state 100% workload. This is the test that Real Temp uses to test sensors. The link above is to version 26.6, which is well suited to all Core 2 and Core i variants.

Core i 2nd, 3rd and 4th Generation CPU's have AVX (Advanced Vector Extension) instruction sets. Recent versions of Prime95 run AVX code on the Floating Point Unit (FPU) math coprocessor, which produces unrealistically extreme temperatures. The FPU test in the software utility AIDA64 shows the same results.

It's not necessary to run AVX code for thermal testing. Prime95 v26.6 produces temperatures on 3rd and 4th Generation processors more consistent with 2nd Generation, which also have AVX instructions, but do not suffer from thermal extremes due to having a soldered Integrated Heat Spreader and a 35% larger Die.

Prime95's default test, Blend, is a cyclic workload for testing memory stability, and Large FFT's combines CPU and memory tests. As such, Blend and Large FFT's both have cyclic workloads which are unsuitable for CPU thermal testing.

Other stability tests such as Linpack and Intel Burn Test have cycles that load all registers with all one's, which is equivalent to a 110% workload, and are also unsuitable for CPU thermal testing. The software utility OCCT runs elements of Linpack and Prime95.

Shown above from left to right: Small FFT's, Blend, Linpack and Intel Burn Test.

Shown above from left to right: Small FFT's, Intel Extreme Tuning Utility CPU Test, and AIDA64 CPU Test.

The "Charts" in SpeedFan show how these tests create different thermal signatures. Intel Extreme Tuning Utility is also a cyclic workload. Although AIDA64's CPU test is steady-state, the workload is insufficient, and it's not available as freeware. ... "

CT :sol:
 
Solution