Better CPU or Better Graphics card?
- Thread starter razzari
- Start date
Solution
- Aug 18, 2013
- 9,961
- 0
- 33,960
The 8320 and GTX 770 would be a better choice. The 9590 is a higher binned 8350, and the 8320 can be overclocked to 8350 speeds.
The GTX 770 would let you play at higher settings compared to the 760 since it's a more powerful card.
The GTX 770 would let you play at higher settings compared to the 760 since it's a more powerful card.
speely
Reputable
- Aug 11, 2014
- 32
- 0
- 4,530
I wouldn't use the stock cooler for anything. Not even as a paperweight. I don't even know why AMD bothers to include the darned thing, they could save themselves a few bucks per unit by just leaving it out entirely, as worthless as it is.
That being said, the Hyper 212 RazerZ suggested is a phenomenally awesome cooler. I used to have one, and I had my FX-4350 overclocked to 4.8GHz and never saw temps over 55°C. The only reason I don't have it anymore is that I really, really wanted a closed-loop water cooler and picked up a Corsair H80i. I gave the Hyper 212 to my best friend and he put it on his Intel 4770k and he hasn't seen temps over 50°C.
It's also like 30 bucks. Pick that baby up.
(edits to correct typos cuz I'm OCD like that)
That being said, the Hyper 212 RazerZ suggested is a phenomenally awesome cooler. I used to have one, and I had my FX-4350 overclocked to 4.8GHz and never saw temps over 55°C. The only reason I don't have it anymore is that I really, really wanted a closed-loop water cooler and picked up a Corsair H80i. I gave the Hyper 212 to my best friend and he put it on his Intel 4770k and he hasn't seen temps over 50°C.
It's also like 30 bucks. Pick that baby up.
(edits to correct typos cuz I'm OCD like that)
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram